Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Charlton vs Leyton Orient highlights

Powell Is Pleasant
Powell Is Pleasant Posts: 1,443
edited April 2012 in General Charlton
They're up on the BBC site now:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/17497281

Quite a good selection of chances; I wasn't at the game, so I'm glad they've got the main talking points in there.
BWP's penalty claim - a definite penalty, but perhaps he's 'looking for it' too much?
And as for Cort's handball, it's just not clear enough on my screen for me to be able to tell.
But that play from Lee Cook to set up the second goal was immense - definitely showing he's a different player to the last time he was here.

Thoughts?

Comments

  • rikofold
    rikofold Posts: 4,051
    Cort's arm is up but the speed that hit the back of the net you'd think only a header could have achieved that. BWP went down too late.
  • Spankie
    Spankie Posts: 1,537
    BWP was one of those, some you get, some you don't but I can see why it wasn't given. He was looking a bit for it but some refs would have definitely given it. Cort's handball can't clearly see from the footage. Cook's assist, what a cross, one of the best I've seen for a while and a great header by Dany.
  • SoundAsa£
    SoundAsa£ Posts: 22,577
    Surely Cort would have/should have been booked had he have handled the ball in....though with that ref nothing surprises me.
  • adamtheaddick
    adamtheaddick Posts: 8,664
    same for the pen, if a player goes down and ref says no pen then he has to yellow card them for diving!!
  • Rothko
    Rothko Posts: 18,872
    Yep BWP looked for it, and Rahubka gave it to him, the ref then bottled the decision in the first 5 minutes
  • Spankie
    Spankie Posts: 1,537
    Not necessarily a yellow for no pen. When a player goes down under a challenge it's not automatically a dive if it's not a foul. See the difference between BWP and Andy Carroll's laughable effort yesterday.
    As regards the handball if the referee thinks it is deliberate handball and he's handling the ball towards goal then yes that should've been a yellow card (think Suarez v Wigan)
  • Deadred
    Deadred Posts: 1,514
    edited April 2012
    Yep BWP looked for it, and Rahubka gave it to him, the ref then bottled the decision in the first 5 minutes
    Stone wall penalty not even an element of doubt. The ref must have had his reading contact lenses in 1st half shame the lino was on the blind side.
  • msomerton
    msomerton Posts: 3,105
    With the BWP penalty claim, it looked to me then and now on replay that the keep grabbed him round the waiste which is what sent him over. How it was not a penalty I can not imagine. The Cort header replay not clear enough, but as said above the speed of the ball into back of net seems to only be possible from a header.
  • E_cafc
    E_cafc Posts: 2,617
    Also with the Cort goal not one Orient player protested. They knew that was a legitimate goal and the reactions of the Charlton players suggest the same!
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,823
    Was clear cut penalty but BWP tried to stay on his feet as he still sniffed a goal and went down with a touch of a delay, but ref was inept in the first half like so many are. I think he did improve in the second but we are due a few good ones!

  • Sponsored links:



  • Rothko
    Rothko Posts: 18,872
    just a thought, but whos on penalties with Jacko out?
  • BowieAddick
    BowieAddick Posts: 1,192
    There were at least two Orient players on the line and neither appealed, normally players appeal even if there is the slightest hint that it might be handball.
  • Rizzo
    Rizzo Posts: 6,468
    Also with the Cort goal not one Orient player protested. They knew that was a legitimate goal and the reactions of the Charlton players suggest the same!
    This. They were throwing their hands up in frustration and having a go at each other. Not one of them seemed to even appeal.

  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,823
    Would have thought Powell would have mentioned it though if the ref had got that one wrong!
  • EastStand
    EastStand Posts: 4,111
    just a thought, but whos on penalties with Jacko out?
    It was BWP when Jacko was out last season. Remember that terrible one along the floor for the Notts televised game?
    This squad I'd prefer either Yann or one of the CMs.
  • Rothko
    Rothko Posts: 18,872
    do you remember Yann last penalty in english football!
  • LenGlover
    LenGlover Posts: 31,723
    just a thought, but whos on penalties with Jacko out?
    It was BWP when Jacko was out last season. Remember that terrible one along the floor for the Notts televised game?
    This squad I'd prefer either Yann or one of the CMs.
    I reckon Solly could take a penalty successfully if required
  • peteshep1905
    peteshep1905 Posts: 491
    same for the pen, if a player goes down and ref says no pen then he has to yellow card them for diving!!
    agree... it must be either a pen or a yellow card

  • Macronate
    Macronate Posts: 12,951
    so we're all agreed that the ref is a clueless tw*t
  • Deadred
    Deadred Posts: 1,514
    so we're all agreed that the ref is a clueless tw*t
    He wasn't that nice.

  • Sponsored links:



  • kinveachyaddick
    kinveachyaddick Posts: 3,972
    Not a single Os defender went up for handball which makes me think it was never hands. As I said in the match views thread, if it was then it's a yellow for deliberate handball and the speed it went in then Cort should have been a champion boxer if that was off his hand...
  • Gammysnr
    Gammysnr Posts: 540
    edited April 2012
    On one of the O's websites the match report claims Cort's goal was ruled out for a foul on Rachubka, yeah right!!

Categories

“Marketplace”