Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

A stubborn amateur

124»

Comments

  • Wilson was no cause for concern last night other than by playing him solly is out of his best position and we look unbalanced

    None of this his fault
  • edited October 2012
    Oakster said:

    I think reading this site for long enough you get to recognise those who hold bitter grudges against players or managers. Very quiet when things go well, but out of the woodwork like a rocket when things go pear shaped. I'm sure there are a few now who have written off Lawrie Wilson, eating a bit of humble pie as he has put in a few decent games, as soon as he has a stinker they'll be on here telling us all about it :(

    I don't understand it really.
    I don't know about other clubs' supporters, but this has been a poison in the Charlton system since I first started following and supporting in 1961. There ALWAYS must be a whipping boy, a player who frustrated fans can hurl abuse at and chew the carpet over. The internet of course gives even more scope for torrents of abuse.
    Part of me can excuse this behaviour. If work is going badly, if the wife is ugly, if the car won't start, if life in general is not living up to expectations, what better way to relieve all that pent up frustration than to hurl abuse at a man in shorts with nice legs who is 10 times more talented than you, earns 10 times what you do, and shags 1000 times more lovely dollies than you do. Better hurling abuse and venting frustration in a semi controlled environment like a football ground or a website than running up Eltham High Street slashing at all and sundry with a machete
  • Amateur! Amateur in what sense?

    Amateur in that he does it in his spare time rather than as his main occupation? No, clearly he's a professional.
    Amateur in that he does without pay? No, he's paid well just like any other professional manager.
    Amateur in that he is without professional qualifications? No, he's got his badges and has just been awarded a doctorate.
    Amateur in that he dabbles rather than taking it seriously? Of course not, he's highly focussed on doing things right.

    So lets clear this up once and for all. There is no way that Powell is an amateur; not in any sense of the word.
  • What's his job ? .. He eats tools in a circus .. is he an 'Ammer Chewer ? ... (all together now) .. NO, HE'S A PROFESSIONAL
  • edited October 2012

    I don't know about other clubs' supporters, but this has been a poison in the Charlton system since I first started following and supporting in 1961. There ALWAYS must be a whipping boy, a player who frustrated fans can hurl abuse at and chew the carpet over. The internet of course gives even more scope for torrents of abuse.
    Part of me can excuse this behaviour. If work is going badly, if the wife is ugly, if the car won't start, if life in general is not living up to expectations, what better way than to hurl abuse at a man in shorts with nice legs who is 10 times more talented than you, earns 10 times what you do, and shags 1000 times more lovely dollies than you do. Better hurling abuse and venting frustration in a semi controlled environment like a football ground or a website than running up Eltham High Street slashing at all and sundry with a machete
    Lincs ive had this conversation so many times on this forum but its seems nobody wants to listen to an explanation.

    Just because a player comes under criticism doesnt mean he's being out to be a scapegoat. If a player comes under criticism from me its because i dont rate what ive seen from him. I dont rate Wilson. I didnt rate Francis. I didnt rate Mooney. It wasnt because i felt the need to put all the blame squarely on one player. If Jackson, or Stephens, or Solly has a bad game, id point it out. If they play well, then id point it out.
    Unfortunately i wasnt able to make the Blackburn game but by all accounts Wilson had a good game. If i had seen it then i would have given him praise. but was that good by his standards or by championship level standard? have we lowered our expectations of what we expect from a championship level RB because he started badly?
    last night, i dont think he played well. i dont think he was dire like the palace game but he wasnt good. He was OK. Fuller was good. On the player marks i gave him a 6. he works tirelesly and i appluad that, but i think he countered that with poor execution and the ability to give the ball away at completely the wrong times.
    The whole scapegoat/whipping boy claim drives me mad. If a player is coming under popular criticism then its probably because he didnt play well and people have the right to point that out.
  • too late with subs and why we finished with 4 defenders on the pitch god knows!!! 4 players marking 1 striker!!! waggy+ both loam players should came on after 60mins when still 1-1 fresh legs and extra pace to get behind the defenders and why take off green!!! I am sorry to say this but league one CP did really well but he is making so many mistakes in this league like playing most of the games with no winger on the pitch so no pace or tricky to get pass players. He is making so many late subs with only tens mins left!! Pointless!!! Give them at least 20-30 mins to make an impact!! I am starting to worry about chris sorry but it's true.
  • edited October 2012

    ly to jeer their own players
    Lincs ive had this conversation so many times on this forum but its seems nobody wants to listen to an explanation.

    Just because a player comes under criticism doesnt mean he's being out to be a scapegoat. If a player comes under criticism from me its because i dont rate what ive seen from him. I dont rate Wilson. I didnt rate Francis. I didnt rate Mooney. It wasnt because i felt the need to put all the blame squarely on one player. If Jackson, or Stephens, or Solly has a bad game, id point it out. If they play well, then id point it out.
    Unfortunately i wasnt able to make the Blackburn game but by all accounts Wilson had a good game. If i had seen it then i would have given him praise. but was that good by his standards or by championship level standard? have we lowered our expectations of what we expect from a championship level RB because he started badly?
    last night, i dont think he played well. i dont think he was dire like the palace game but he wasnt good. He was OK. Fuller was good. On the player marks i gave him a 6. he works tirelesly and i appluad that, but i think he countered that with poor execution and the ability to give the ball away at completely the wrong times.
    The whole scapegoat/whipping boy claim drives me mad. If a player is coming under popular criticism then its probably because he didnt play well and people have the right to point that out.
    I agree with EVERY word you write Gary .. BUT ... [you knew it was coming (:->) ] .. BUT .. this is not about justified criticism of a player this is akin to playground bullying. I'll say right now that I attend few games at the valley in any season, I attend a lot of away games where the 'hardcore' CAFC fans are more knowledgable and less likely to jeer and abuse the players, in fact quite the reverse.
    Perhaps the 'modern' fan is less likely to pick on a whipping boy because of hair colour, facial features, etc etc. Last night on here we had a poster calling Wilson 'a useless cnut' .. he claims to have been at the game and didn't state if he shouted this at Wilson as well as posting it, either case, it is uncalled for. The general consensus seemed to be that Wilson had a decent game and is doing well. This poster seems to have a 'thing' about Wilson and I'll wager that if Wilson were to score the winner in the Cup Final he's still be classed a 'f88ing useless cnut'.
    Perhaps 'bullying' and 'whipping boy choosing' has gone out of fashion. My cynical old self does not think it has.
  • Very frustrated when i posted, and slightly emptional as a result of a few drinks and watching us go 2-1 down when we should of been about 5-1 up.

    Overall i think CP has purchased some decent players ...just not sure he's getting anywhere near the best out of them. Tactics worry me as this isnt the first time its happened this season. Not sure inexperience can be blamed either, I would guess he has been in charge now for at least 60 games

    Credit for supporting Fuller and playing him last night
  • nolly said:

    why do we always hump the ball up

    Because of the gaping hole between the defence and attack.

  • Not a bad result for an amateur...
  • Sponsored links:


  • Sack him!
  • Quote from the - Northern - radio commentary at the end:

    "Chris Powell has set his side up superbly this afternoon"
  • I don't understand. Holloway made his subs early...I thought that was the simple solution to winning a game?
  • I don't understand. Holloway made his subs early...I thought that was the simple solution to winning a game?

    Only when it works. Otherwise its called "panic".

  • Come on chaps, let's move.on and enjoy a great victory
  • Off_it said:

    Only when it works. Otherwise its called "panic".

    Maybe we won because Powell made a really early substitution today
  • Come on chaps, let's move.on and enjoy a great victory

    This !
  • Come on chaps, let's move.on and enjoy a great victory

    What, and miss out on the opportunity to score some points?

    Oh, ok then.

Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!