Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Mark Hudson...money
Comments
-
But why were they half interested? Ambrose, for example, scored for fun the next season for PalaceSimonsen said:
No. We were so far adrift and had far too many poor or half interested players. Towards the end we were looking to Chris Dickson to give us some hope. Can you imagine Chris Dickson or Tresor Kandol even getting near the team we have now? BWP can't even get near it.killerandflash said:If we had kept Paddy, would we have stayed up? That season, if we had scraped 4th from bottom, the long recovery would have been a lot easier, and new investment might have come in sooner
0 -
You could be right but it would be a separate contract between the two clubs from the one between Hudson and CardiffAbsurdistan said:
I can't believe that the clause would have been for a longer time period than the players contract. But I gladly would like to be proven wrong.EGAddick said:
Still doesn't affect what Rob62 has said. The agreement would have been between Charlton and Cardiff, not Hudson and Cardiff - which is a separate matter.Absurdistan said:
Yes but if wiki is right, then the original contract would have finished in 2012.Rob62 said:Transfer clauses aren't affected by a players contract, otherwise teams could just give a player a new contract a day after signing them to negate the clause.
0 -
Cant agree with that, like an alcoholic/gambler we needed to hit rock bottom before we started to climb back up. If we had stayed up we might have been in a worse position now.killerandflash said:If we had kept Paddy, would we have stayed up? That season, if we had scraped 4th from bottom, the long recovery would have been a lot easier, and new investment might have come in sooner
0
