Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Cameron & Pornography

JT
JT Posts: 12,348
in Not Sports Related
lol @ The Mail claiming some form of victory. ''Older than her years'' !

image
«13

Comments

  • RedPanda
    RedPanda Posts: 4,991
    5 out of 5 for stories on the right, impressive. Hard hitting, relevant and in no way hypocritical.
  • ValleyGary
    ValleyGary Posts: 37,995
    haha superb.
  • kentaddick
    kentaddick Posts: 18,729
    Why is it every piece of government legislation on the internet seems to be written by people who have never been on the internet? You can already put parental filters via your ISP. I thought when labour went out of office we'd come to the end of the government encouraging parents to take zero responsibility for their children.
  • SELR_addicks
    SELR_addicks Posts: 15,488
    Nice bit of censorship from the government here...would be interesting to see what the legislation actually says and whether they try to sneak in blocks for other websites.

    Children can just watch tv or listen to music and get bombarded with sexual innuendo. It's pointless blocking it, just means millions of teenagers will be more moody than normal!
  • Ormiston_Addick
    Ormiston_Addick Posts: 8,813
    The Australian government tried this and had to abandon it, it's completely impossible to do and is done simply to garner headlines from newspapers.

    Anyone with a brain knows that the paedophile scum don't go round sharing stuff on open sites, it's all done on private networks which would be impossible to close down completely.

    The Internet is what it is, it enables some amazing things and some appalling things, we just have to accept that and not be taken in by fucktard politicians trying to "protect" us from it.
  • kentaddick
    kentaddick Posts: 18,729
    Ormiston Addick said:

    The Australian government tried this and had to abandon it, it's completely impossible to do and is done simply to garner headlines from newspapers.

    Anyone with a brain knows that the paedophile scum don't go round sharing stuff on open sites, it's all done on private networks which would be impossible to close down completely.

    The Internet is what it is, it enables some amazing things and some appalling things, we just have to accept that and not be taken in by fucktard politicians trying to "protect" us from it.

    exactly
  • JiMMy 85
    JiMMy 85 Posts: 10,199
    The Chloe Moretz story at the bottom of the 'navigation of shame' is quite disturbing.
  • McBobbin
    McBobbin Posts: 12,052
    And some people wonder why the Daily Mail comes in for a hard time on this site. I just can't articulate how much I hate that paper and all it stands for
  • Bolderhumphreyreid
    Bolderhumphreyreid Posts: 2,556
    The BBC headline states: "Cameron unveils online porn curbs".

    Now I like Curbs a lot but that's not my cuppa.
  • Vincenzo
    Vincenzo Posts: 2,911
    McBobbin said:

    And some people wonder why the Daily Mail comes in for a hard time on this site. I just can't articulate how much I hate that paper and all it stands for

    Me too. It's disgusting and an embarrassment to journalism in this country.

  • Sponsored links:



  • soapy_jones
    soapy_jones Posts: 21,371
    Vincenzo said:

    McBobbin said:

    And some people wonder why the Daily Mail comes in for a hard time on this site. I just can't articulate how much I hate that paper and all it stands for

    Me too. It's disgusting and an embarrassment to journalism in this country.
    TBH it has a lot of competition in this country
  • Goonerhater
    Goonerhater Posts: 12,677
    Horay for the moral crusader that is The Gaurdian (sorry can i say crusader?)
  • The Red Robin
    The Red Robin Posts: 26,133
    That's brilliant. This is the same Daily Mail that is opposed to press censorship.
  • Yorkshireaddick
    Yorkshireaddick Posts: 511
    The hypocrisy of newspapers in this country is breath taking. Good spot JT!
  • soapy_jones
    soapy_jones Posts: 21,371
    Thank feck for our media though. Without it I would not have a first clue what happens in a hospital when a baby is delivered, thankyou thankyou, thankyou!
  • Vincenzo
    Vincenzo Posts: 2,911
    soapy_jones said:

    Vincenzo said:

    McBobbin said:

    And some people wonder why the Daily Mail comes in for a hard time on this site. I just can't articulate how much I hate that paper and all it stands for

    Me too. It's disgusting and an embarrassment to journalism in this country.
    TBH it has a lot of competition in this country
    Indeed! Embarrassing journalism here takes some doing, given what our tabloids get up to.
  • man_at_milletts
    man_at_milletts Posts: 5,620
    SELR_addicks said:

    Nice bit of censorship from the government here...would be interesting to see what the legislation actually says and whether they try to sneak in blocks for other websites.

    Children can just watch tv or listen to music and get bombarded with sexual innuendo. It's pointless blocking it, just means millions of teenagers will be more moody than normal!

    Looks like it's back to the bra section of the Freemans catalogue then!
  • soapy_jones
    soapy_jones Posts: 21,371
    Always get nostalgic when I see one of those laying around. With five boys in the house I am surprised mum managed to order anything, the book went missing so often...
  • Vincenzo
    Vincenzo Posts: 2,911
    I have no idea what you're talking about **cough**
  • McBobbin
    McBobbin Posts: 12,052
    without wanting to undermine my own moral outrage, there was an element of achievement after finding a mag in a bush. A couple of clicks offers only a fraction of the satisfaction.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Absurdistan
    Absurdistan Posts: 8,024
    soapy_jones said:

    Always get nostalgic when I see one of those laying around. With five boys in the house I am surprised mum managed to order anything, the book went missing so often...

    lol

  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,928
    McBobbin said:

    without wanting to undermine my own moral outrage, there was an element of achievement after finding a mag in a bush. A couple of clicks offers only a fraction of the satisfaction.

    A mag in a bush or a bush in a mag?
  • McBobbin
    McBobbin Posts: 12,052
    A bush in a mag in a bush. This was the 80s when bushes still existed.
  • masicat
    masicat Posts: 5,010
    Haven't read the thread but not surprised. Dirty bastard.
  • I_Saw_Semedo_Score
    I_Saw_Semedo_Score Posts: 1,632
    masicat said:

    Haven't read the thread but not surprised. Dirty bastard.

    Haha.
  • SELR_addicks
    SELR_addicks Posts: 15,488
    Would love to see conversations between teenagers and parents trying to get the parents to opt-in....

    'I need it for a forum I go on, honest!'
  • Off_it
    Off_it Posts: 28,901
    SELR_addicks said:

    Would love to see conversations between teenagers and parents trying to get the parents to opt-in....

    'I need it for a forum I go on, honest!'

    Not just teenagers and parents mate!
  • AddickUpNorth
    AddickUpNorth Posts: 8,325
    kentaddick said:

    Why is it every piece of government legislation on the internet seems to be written by people who have never been on the internet? You can already put parental filters via your ISP. I thought when labour went out of office we'd come to the end of the government encouraging parents to take zero responsibility for their children.

    This.

  • tangoflash
    tangoflash Posts: 10,786
    Maybe this will spell the end of "Whose Rack?", thus making Big_Rob redundent, adding to the unemployment statistics. Well done Mr Cameron, I hope you're happy now..............................sob
  • soapy_jones
    soapy_jones Posts: 21,371
    B Rob has already resigned his position. Mr Absurd has taken over the mantle in a caretaker position.

    I for one will defend to the death as a frustrated middle aged sex starved pervert the "Whose Rack? and "Would Ya?" threads on CL.

Categories

“Marketplace”