Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
** Takeover rumours - ed. Deal 'allegedly' DONE p.66**
Comments
-
We did that on Monday !!!Valley McMoist said:
I did that on Sunday...Much more interesting (Who says I never treat the missus)Bolderhumphreyreid said:Bored of this thread. I'm off to buy a Dyson.
What a great sucker !
0 -
Maybe this is a good time to close the thread. Or have a different title to indicate that there is nothing going on so that we are spared having to go into the thread ?2
-
ITV is full of crap, apart from loose women.0
-
Well there has been a news vacuum...Bolderhumphreyreid said:Bored of this thread. I'm off to buy a Dyson.
1 -
You did what on Monday!!?Fanny Fanackapan said:
We did that on Monday !!!Valley McMoist said:
I did that on Sunday...Much more interesting (Who says I never treat the missus)Bolderhumphreyreid said:Bored of this thread. I'm off to buy a Dyson.
What a great sucker !0 -
Covered End said:
Anyway, it's pretty obvious, at the moment, that no one commenting on here knows much.Bedsaddick said:
I've had no such request and i will bitch about who i like thanks.Stu_of_Kunming said:
Why keep ignoring AFKA's request?Bedsaddick said:
Your dead right. If you take notice of the idiots ( idiot ) on that board you deserve to be disappointed.ValleyGary said:lets not take ITTV as gospel
There is no evidence that anyone has pulled out ( not that they were ever in ) fact quite the contrary , there seems to be another party interested.
'm fairly certain he asked people to stop bitching about ITV, it does get a little boring.Bedsaddick said:
What request ?Stu_of_Kunming said:
Why keep ignoring AFKA's request?Bedsaddick said:
Your dead right. If you take notice of the idiots ( idiot ) on that board you deserve to be disappointed.ValleyGary said:lets not take ITTV as gospel
There is no evidence that anyone has pulled out ( not that they were ever in ) fact quite the contrary , there seems to be another party interested.
Am i the only one saying how bad Into the Valley is ?
When someone says it's on, people say yes yes we know.
Then someone says, I think it's off & many of the same people are saying yes yes I know it's off.
Ad infinitum :-)
A pretty fair assessment really.
0 -
Because ultimately, it all trickles down from the same sources.Covered End said:
You're obviously unaware Beds. AFKA asked everyone to stop referring to them, in order to keep the best possible relations, as we are all Charlton fans.Bedsaddick said:
I've had no such request and i will bitch about who i like thanks.Stu_of_Kunming said:
Why keep ignoring AFKA's request?Bedsaddick said:
Your dead right. If you take notice of the idiots ( idiot ) on that board you deserve to be disappointed.ValleyGary said:lets not take ITTV as gospel
There is no evidence that anyone has pulled out ( not that they were ever in ) fact quite the contrary , there seems to be another party interested.
'm fairly certain he asked people to stop bitching about ITV, it does get a little boring.Bedsaddick said:
What request ?Stu_of_Kunming said:
Why keep ignoring AFKA's request?Bedsaddick said:
Your dead right. If you take notice of the idiots ( idiot ) on that board you deserve to be disappointed.ValleyGary said:lets not take ITTV as gospel
There is no evidence that anyone has pulled out ( not that they were ever in ) fact quite the contrary , there seems to be another party interested.
Am i the only one saying how bad Into the Valley is ?
Anyway, it's pretty obvious, at the moment, that no one commenting on here knows much.
When someone says it's on, people say yes yes we know.
Then someone says, I think it's off & many of the same people are saying yes yes I know it's off.
Ad infinitum :-)
It's like a family tree.
Only a couple of people are privy to the actual truth. They mention it to a couple of people, who they each mention to a couple of people. Then one of them will post it on a forum, while another emails or texts his 12 closest friends. And they the tell people.
And eventually you end up with people believing something must be true because they have heard it from three unconnected people and read it on a forum, despite the fact it all probably originated from the same person in the first place.
Of course what might have been true yesterday can be false today, and what might have been off today might be on tomorrow, which leads to a ridiculous game of cat and mouse with people desperately trying to determine what is the latest of the info and how strong a source that latest info is.
The bottom line is that most people who have some degree of inside line, generally all hear the same rumour at roughly the same time, maybe with a slight twist the more it comes away from the original root.
Henry Irving has plagued this forum for years with a load of old pony, but his 'it's only true when it's on the OS' is the only thing that really matters.
Until then, either enjoy the show and take it all with a pinch of salt. Something that is a done deal is never a done deal until the i's are dotted, the t's crossed, and a scarf is being held upside down on the OS.
14 -
Can Admin loop the last message to the first on this thread to save us all the trouble of posting on it?
And how about arranging a Christmas Day truce with ITTV with a football match between the trenches?
0 -
Could be messy, have plenty of spare (blood) shirts at the ready.delroofer said:Can Admin loop the last message to the first on this thread to save us all the trouble of posting on it?
And how about arranging a Christmas Day truce with ITTV with a football match between the trenches?0 - Sponsored links:
-
This....The takeover is dead. Long live the takeoverAFKABartram said:
Because ultimately, it all trickles down from the same sources.Covered End said:
You're obviously unaware Beds. AFKA asked everyone to stop referring to them, in order to keep the best possible relations, as we are all Charlton fans.Bedsaddick said:
I've had no such request and i will bitch about who i like thanks.Stu_of_Kunming said:
Why keep ignoring AFKA's request?Bedsaddick said:
Your dead right. If you take notice of the idiots ( idiot ) on that board you deserve to be disappointed.ValleyGary said:lets not take ITTV as gospel
There is no evidence that anyone has pulled out ( not that they were ever in ) fact quite the contrary , there seems to be another party interested.
'm fairly certain he asked people to stop bitching about ITV, it does get a little boring.Bedsaddick said:
What request ?Stu_of_Kunming said:
Why keep ignoring AFKA's request?Bedsaddick said:
Your dead right. If you take notice of the idiots ( idiot ) on that board you deserve to be disappointed.ValleyGary said:lets not take ITTV as gospel
There is no evidence that anyone has pulled out ( not that they were ever in ) fact quite the contrary , there seems to be another party interested.
Am i the only one saying how bad Into the Valley is ?
Anyway, it's pretty obvious, at the moment, that no one commenting on here knows much.
When someone says it's on, people say yes yes we know.
Then someone says, I think it's off & many of the same people are saying yes yes I know it's off.
Ad infinitum :-)
It's like a family tree.
Only a couple of people are privy to the actual truth. They mention it to a couple of people, who they each mention to a couple of people. Then one of them will post it on a forum, while another emails or texts his 12 closest friends. And they the tell people.
And eventually you end up with people believing something must be true because they have heard it from three unconnected people and read it on a forum, despite the fact it all probably originated from the same person in the first place.
Of course what might have been true yesterday can be false today, and what might have been off today might be on tomorrow, which leads to a ridiculous game of cat and mouse with people desperately trying to determine what is the latest of the info and how strong a source that latest info is.
The bottom line is that most people who have some degree of inside line, generally all hear the same rumour at roughly the same time, maybe with a slight twist the more it comes away from the original root.
Henry Irving has plagued this forum for years with a load of old pony, but his 'it's only true when it's on the OS' is the only thing that really matters.
Until then, either enjoy the show and take it all with a pinch of salt. Something that is a done deal is never a done deal until the i's are dotted, the t's crossed, and a scarf is being held upside down on the OS.0 -
I can confirm the new owners are not on the coach to Reading, in fact nobody's on it at the moment.0
-
You stalking the team hotel?northstandsteve said:I can confirm the new owners are not on the coach to Reading, in fact nobody's on it at the moment.
0 -
Nope I'm being a saddo tonite and on the coach from Dartford.1
-
I was going to "like" afka's post until he libeled me and even worse got the quote wrong. It's "I'll believe it when it's on the OS".
So I would be flagging that but you can't do that to Admin.
Meanwhile I can say the takeover is 0% done.
That isnt inside info or a change since yesterday, last week or last month.
It is just that deals be they for players or clubs are always in one of two stages ie 0% done or 100% done.
Terms such as close, advanced, imminent, Monday or Tuesday, nearly done or 99% done are just journo terms to whip up excitment.
When the deal is signed, the money is in the bank and there is a photo of the new owner standing in the directors box holding a Charlton scarf above his head with "The Valley" spelt out behind him in the East stand seats on the OS then it is done.
Meanwhile I enjoy the gossip and debate so carrying on adding whatever you hear either here on via the inbox, just take it all with a pinch of salt.
Gotta go as my "source" is ringing. : - )0 -
I don't think the valleys pitch will be as playable as "no mans land" during ww1delroofer said:Can Admin loop the last message to the first on this thread to save us all the trouble of posting on it?
And how about arranging a Christmas Day truce with ITTV with a football match between the trenches?1 -
Just to save SG3 posting in 1914 no mans land was not the muddy quagmire of Passendale in 1917 but green winter fieldspaulbaconsarnie said:
I don't think the valleys pitch will be as playable as "no mans land" during ww1delroofer said:Can Admin loop the last message to the first on this thread to save us all the trouble of posting on it?
And how about arranging a Christmas Day truce with ITTV with a football match between the trenches?
: - )0 -
Dont you just hate know alls.2
-
Henry should know. He was there!3
-
Henry was at the 'Battle of Cardigan'5
- Sponsored links:
-
Let me see if he's in the book
http://www.amazon.co.uk/Battle-Cardigan-Crug-Bretwalda-Battles-ebook/dp/B008ZQC9T60 -
I'll let you know when I engage with one.northstandsteve said:Dont you just hate know alls.
1 -
Always get my hopes up when there's 70 new comments when I log on...1
-
Last time I inbox you with all the ITK info. : - )northstandsteve said:Dont you just hate know alls.
0 -
Thanks to you I have stars and stripes trousers I cannot use0
-
Ive decided that I do NOT want anybody to stick anything in my box
Thank you0 -
Good for awaydays at Palacenorthstandsteve said:Thanks to you I have stars and stripes trousers I cannot use
0 -
Why do people inbox each other with info? This is a forum, this is where you post things.Henry Irving said:
Last time I inbox you with all the ITK info. : - )northstandsteve said:Dont you just hate know alls.
Its Charlton not Mi5.0 -
Its Charlton not Mi5.
That's what those ITK want you to think! Don't be fooled - be careful careless talk and all that.2 -
Henry Irving said:
Just to save SG3 posting in 1914 no mans land was not the muddy quagmire of Passendale in 1917 but green winter fieldspaulbaconsarnie said:
I don't think the valleys pitch will be as playable as "no mans land" during ww1delroofer said:Can Admin loop the last message to the first on this thread to save us all the trouble of posting on it?
And how about arranging a Christmas Day truce with ITTV with a football match between the trenches?
: - )
It was bloody muddy when we were there.
And cold.
0
This discussion has been closed.
