Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Church - Non Penalty - Ref needs to explain

2

Comments

  • classic professional clip of the back heel. defenders do it all the time. every time a ref gives them I applaud because it's hard to spot which is why defenders use it so much.
  • Brian
    Brian Posts: 273
    Looked a penalty to me, Church had his heels clipped. Not a red card though as he was going away from goal.
  • He doesn't need to explain it. He obviously doesn't feel it was a penalty. Refs should not be put in front of cameras after the game to explain decisions or why they did or didn't award something. Players don't have to justify why they made mistakes in games in front of the cameras and neither should refs. Imagine a ref making a mistake in a game, coming on TV to accept it and then reffing at Stanford Bridge or Old Trafford the next week. The likes of Mourinho and Moyes would have a field day using mind games. Refs get the large majority of decisions correct...more than any manager or player does.

    No likes after last night no wonder.The Ref was a c**t

  • Valley11
    Valley11 Posts: 12,019
    Penalty. Can't see why he didn't give it. He may have thought the defender was stronger than church but its church who wins the ball.
  • PeterGage
    PeterGage Posts: 1,799
    This thread shows what an impossible task referees have. Some here say "cert penalty" and others "no penalty". He cant satisfy two sets of views when they are so diverse !!
  • uie2
    uie2 Posts: 4,596
    MrLargo said:

    Never gonna happen, and an apology won't do anything for our league position. Don't usually moan about officials but they have cost us points against both Leeds and Reading now.

    And ipswich
  • masicat
    masicat Posts: 5,013
    The only way a ref can give a pen is if he is 100% certain a foul has been committed. There is no way he can be certain in this instance on the run from 30 yards away. Impossible to give, and if he did, he would have to be guessing.
  • AddickFC81
    AddickFC81 Posts: 4,053
    masicat said:

    The only way a ref can give a pen is if he is 100% certain a foul has been committed. There is no way he can be certain in this instance on the run from 30 yards away. Impossible to give, and if he did, he would have to be guessing.

    Video technology as the ball has gone out of play
  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 32,802
    Just watched it for the first time. Not a pen for me.
  • JaShea99
    JaShea99 Posts: 5,481

    He doesn't need to explain it. He obviously doesn't feel it was a penalty. Refs should not be put in front of cameras after the game to explain decisions or why they did or didn't award something. Players don't have to justify why they made mistakes in games in front of the cameras and neither should refs. Imagine a ref making a mistake in a game, coming on TV to accept it and then reffing at Stanford Bridge or Old Trafford the next week. The likes of Mourinho and Moyes would have a field day using mind games. Refs get the large majority of decisions correct...more than any manager or player does.

    I think the difference is, if a player/manger consistently makes mistakes then he's considered to not be doing his job properly and therefore will lose it. Yet we seem to get a poor ref, and not only does he continue to ref after our game, but he's replaced with an equally poor one the next week. 2 points in 4 days is unforgivable and could be crucial come the end of the season yet I doubt those officials have given their poor decisions a second thought.

    I'm not saying it's an easy job at all, but there are thousands of difficult jobs out there. If it's too hard, don't do it.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Not saying I wouldn't have been screaming for it had I been there, but don't think it's a pen!
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,122
    Watched the video and for me it's not as comprehensive as others have made out
  • JiMMy 85
    JiMMy 85 Posts: 10,209

    JiMMy 85 said:

    Although I can't prove it, my guess is that there would be absolutely no evidence to support the 'big clubs win more penalties' theory. Didn't Spurs go nearly an entire year without a penalty? How does that work? Were they only playing the four teams above them?

    Well most times we've played at Old Trafford, Anfield, Highbury/Emirates, Stamford Bridge, White Hart Lane, we've had loads of decent shouts & hardly had a sniff. They get them at the drop of a hat.

    Funny how Man U hadn't had a penalty against them at OT for, what was it 1 year, 2 years ?
    That's because big clubs spend far less time defending in their own area. They're a big club who can afford defenders who don't give away many penalties. Midfielders who have so much possession, the opposition rarely get into the United penalty area. It's far more likely that supporters connect incidents they remember to create a 'poor us' theory, than referees being heavily influenced by the home crowd.
  • Penalty all day long.
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,806
    The sad fact is that we know in our heart of hearts that if the incident happened at the offer end it would have ben a pen. I do beleive that we are in arrears when it comes to these sort of decisions and that frustrates me immensely.

    There was atime, when the Valley was a more intimidating place when we were in credit. I think poor refs use the Valley now to prove they haven't got a home bias and most of them are poor in all honesty!
  • rather than blaming refs, blame the likes of Ashley Young who consistently try to cheat refs by diving but seem to be allowed to get away with it time and time again without all this furore. These types of players mean refs most likley go into a game knowing that at some stage a player will dive so it makes their job that much harder.

    We are lucky at Charlton we don't have many players who do this but unfortunately the minority ruin it for the majority
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,806
    Then the refs should do their homework
  • PeterGage
    PeterGage Posts: 1,799

    Then the refs should do their homework

    What makes you think they don't?

  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,806
    my eyes!
  • PeterGage
    PeterGage Posts: 1,799

    my eyes!

    Perhaps glasses will help, or a better understanding of the Laws of the Game, or both.


  • Sponsored links:



  • Perhaps the "NOs" can explain their view.

    a) he never touched him
    b) it was a coming together of two players, neither at fault
    c) he was clipped but had lost control of the ball
    d) AN other
    e) You're a ref and don't like to criticise your fellow professionals
    f) you're on a wind-up

    Live I thought it was nailed on and haven't changed my mind from the replay
  • RedChaser
    RedChaser Posts: 19,892
    edited December 2013

    rather than blaming refs, blame the likes of Ashley Young who consistently try to cheat refs by diving but seem to be allowed to get away with it time and time again without all this furore. These types of players mean refs most likley go into a game knowing that at some stage a player will dive so it makes their job that much harder.

    We are lucky at Charlton we don't have many players who do this but unfortunately the minority ruin it for the majority

    Agreed however I think most forwards have been taught at some point to go to ground when there is contact especially in the penalty area and both Yann and Church know when to hit the deck.
  • JiMMy 85 said:

    JiMMy 85 said:

    Although I can't prove it, my guess is that there would be absolutely no evidence to support the 'big clubs win more penalties' theory. Didn't Spurs go nearly an entire year without a penalty? How does that work? Were they only playing the four teams above them?

    Well most times we've played at Old Trafford, Anfield, Highbury/Emirates, Stamford Bridge, White Hart Lane, we've had loads of decent shouts & hardly had a sniff. They get them at the drop of a hat.

    Funny how Man U hadn't had a penalty against them at OT for, what was it 1 year, 2 years ?
    That's because big clubs spend far less time defending in their own area. They're a big club who can afford defenders who don't give away many penalties. Midfielders who have so much possession, the opposition rarely get into the United penalty area. It's far more likely that supporters connect incidents they remember to create a 'poor us' theory, than referees being heavily influenced by the home crowd.
    So good, that they're 9th.
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,806
    Yes, I agree. That might help some refs.
  • JiMMy 85
    JiMMy 85 Posts: 10,209

    JiMMy 85 said:

    JiMMy 85 said:

    Although I can't prove it, my guess is that there would be absolutely no evidence to support the 'big clubs win more penalties' theory. Didn't Spurs go nearly an entire year without a penalty? How does that work? Were they only playing the four teams above them?

    Well most times we've played at Old Trafford, Anfield, Highbury/Emirates, Stamford Bridge, White Hart Lane, we've had loads of decent shouts & hardly had a sniff. They get them at the drop of a hat.

    Funny how Man U hadn't had a penalty against them at OT for, what was it 1 year, 2 years ?
    That's because big clubs spend far less time defending in their own area. They're a big club who can afford defenders who don't give away many penalties. Midfielders who have so much possession, the opposition rarely get into the United penalty area. It's far more likely that supporters connect incidents they remember to create a 'poor us' theory, than referees being heavily influenced by the home crowd.
    So good, that they're 9th.
    Shittest post of the day that I've read. Good one.
  • JiMMy 85
    JiMMy 85 Posts: 10,209
    RedChaser said:

    rather than blaming refs, blame the likes of Ashley Young who consistently try to cheat refs by diving but seem to be allowed to get away with it time and time again without all this furore. These types of players mean refs most likley go into a game knowing that at some stage a player will dive so it makes their job that much harder.

    We are lucky at Charlton we don't have many players who do this but unfortunately the minority ruin it for the majority

    Agreed however I think most fowards have been taught at some point to go to ground when there is contact especially in the penalty area and both Yann and Church know when to hit the deck.
    I completely agree with this - refs shouldn't be blamed when players, managers, coaches, fans et al will ALL try and deceive the referee before he's made a single error.

    Players will lie through their teeth to win a throw, but blame the ref when he gets it wrong and then - and this winds me up the most - chat to each other and have a laugh about how rubbish the ref is, as they walk away.
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,806
    The reason they are taught to go to ground is that refs don't give a foul if they don't. It is not cheating, but helping the ref make a decision. Diving when there is no contact or no foul is cheating. The problem for me is that most refs didn't play the game to a decent level so they may undertsand the rules but they don't undertstand what really goes on. The best ones do of course, but a lot of refs have alsways wanted to be refs. I'd rather ex players do the job, as anybody who wants to be a ref above being a player worries me!
  • When the 23 people go onto the football pitch only 1 isn't going to deliberately cheat within the 90 minutes.
    The other 22 will steal yards at freekicks and throw-ins, feign injuries, time waste and lie.
  • Dave2l
    Dave2l Posts: 8,880
    A ref with no bottle. If it's not a penalty (according to the ref) then church should have been sent off for diving. It's not a "nothing" situation is it, a clear foul or dive occurred in the penalty box.
  • I_Saw_Semedo_Score
    I_Saw_Semedo_Score Posts: 1,632
    edited December 2013
    JiMMy 85 said:

    JiMMy 85 said:

    JiMMy 85 said:

    Although I can't prove it, my guess is that there would be absolutely no evidence to support the 'big clubs win more penalties' theory. Didn't Spurs go nearly an entire year without a penalty? How does that work? Were they only playing the four teams above them?

    Well most times we've played at Old Trafford, Anfield, Highbury/Emirates, Stamford Bridge, White Hart Lane, we've had loads of decent shouts & hardly had a sniff. They get them at the drop of a hat.

    Funny how Man U hadn't had a penalty against them at OT for, what was it 1 year, 2 years ?
    That's because big clubs spend far less time defending in their own area. They're a big club who can afford defenders who don't give away many penalties. Midfielders who have so much possession, the opposition rarely get into the United penalty area. It's far more likely that supporters connect incidents they remember to create a 'poor us' theory, than referees being heavily influenced by the home crowd.
    So good, that they're 9th.
    Shittest post of the day that I've read. Good one.
    Would have to top nearly all of yours. Saying Man U don't give penalties away solely because they have brilliant defenders (when they actually have Johnny Evans and the erratic, shirt-pulling Vidic at the back) is laughable. The penalty Ashley Young won against Palace earlier this season, for example, was a joke. Would he have won that if he was playing for Palace? Would he shite.

    Similarly the penalty Chelsea "won" AT HOME to West Brom. The pen that never was. When was the last time you saw one of these go against the big teams? When was the last time Southampton or Stoke won a last-minute, questionable pen at Old Trafford, Emirates or Stamford Bridge?

    Your comment about "midfielders having so much possession opposing teams rarely get into their half" is a joke, surely. Do you mean (again using Man United's midfield as the example) the midfield duo of Tom Cleverley and Phil Jones, who have been widely criticised this season for not playing many incisive or even forward passes? Did you see the possession stats in the game against Everton yesterday? Do your homework before making stupid comments and making up facts.