Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Middlesboro v Charlton - Player Marks
AFKABartram
Posts: 57,909
Usual marks out of ten please if you were there
Thuram
Wilson
Wiggins
Morrison
Wood
Cousins
Stephens
Jackson
Cook
Harriott
Kermorgant
Green
Church
Adjarevic on/a
Stat bank change
From now on the Statbank will show the MoM and average player marks for the game in the main body of the thread with all the extra stats in the usual pdf file.
Thuram
Wilson
Wiggins
Morrison
Wood
Cousins
Stephens
Jackson
Cook
Harriott
Kermorgant
Green
Church
Adjarevic on/a
Stat bank change
From now on the Statbank will show the MoM and average player marks for the game in the main body of the thread with all the extra stats in the usual pdf file.
0
Comments
-
Thuram - 3 You are having a laugh....very por
Wilson - 6 did ok
Wiggins - 5 Harsh sending off
Morrison - 6 Solid
Wood - 7 Solid and good distribution
Cousins - 5 didn't do enough really
Stephens - 6 did ok 2nd half
Jackson - 5 not on the pace
Cook - 5.5 Not on the pace of the game
Harriott - 6 did ok
Kermorgant - 7 decent contribution but needed support
Green - 5 Not in the game
Church - 6 Ran around and supported well
Adjarevic - Can't run and didn't look like he could adapt to the pace, but not long enough to score1 -
Thuram 5.5 goal seemed to go through him poor kicking two point blank saves late on
Wilson 6 steady
Wiggins 6 solid lost control of ball followed by bit of a lunge for red card
Morrison 6 did ok
Wood 6.5 best defender
Cousins 5 not as assured
Stephens 5 quiet game
Jackson 4 legs gone for 2 games In 4 days
Cook 3 ineffective and lightweight
Harriott 5 tried but nothing came off
Kermorgant 5.5 ploughed a lone furrow
Green 4 typical
Church 3 did he actually come on?
Adjarevic 6 nice crisp passes like him
0 -
I'm hoping you meant "passes"RedChaser said:Thuram 5.5 goal seemed to go through him poor kicking two point blank saves late on
Wilson 6 steady
Wiggins 6 solid
Morrison 6 ditto
Wood 6.6 best defendet
Cousins 5 not as assured
Stephens 5 quiet game
Jackson 4 legs gone for 2 games I'm 4 days
Cook ineffective and lightweight
Harriott 5 tried but nothing came off
Kermorgant 5.5 ploughed a lone furrow
Green 4 typical
Church 3 did he actually come on?
Adjarevic 6 nice crisp asses like him
7 -
Cheers edited :0)0
-
Thuram 6, ok he let one in but played very well for the rest of the match
Wilson 5
Wiggins 4
Morrison 5
Wood 6
Cousins 4
Stephens 4
Jackson 4
Cook 3
Harriott 5 (increased from 3 to 5 after reflection)
Kermorgant 5
Green 4
Church 30 -
Thuram - 5; conceded a poor goal. A couple of decent second half saves but his error was the pivotal moment in this game
Wilson - 6: he and the rest of the back four contained their attackers, notably their wide men, pretty well
Wiggins -6
Morrison -6
Wood-6
Cousins-5
Stephens-5
Jackson-5
Cook-4.5
Harriott-7: offered an outlet and looked dangerous at times
Kermorgant -6:laid the ball off pretty well but lacked support
Green - not much of an impact
Church - ditto
Adjarevic on/a0 -
Thuram 5
Wilson 5
Wiggins 5
Morrison 7
Wood 6
Cousins 7
Stephens 5
Jackson 5
Cook 5
Harriott 5
Kermorgant 5
0 -
I wasn't at the game but going on the football league highlights I'm surprised at church's scores as he actually had the ball in the net (didn't look like a foul to me) and Almost scored from an acute angle0
-
Thuram - 6 he was the busier of the two keepers and made a couple of excellent saves, a pity his mistake cost us a point
Wilson - 6
Wiggins - 5.5 red may have been harsh but he was daft to go in the way he did
Morrison - 6
Wood - 6
Cousins - 5
Stephens - 5
Jackson - 5
Cook - 5
Harriott - 5.5 beat his full back a number of times but final delivery was poor
Kermorgant - 6
Green - 4 poor
Church - 5 added some urgency up front
0 -
surprised how low the scores are generally considering we lost by one flukey goal away to an in-form team0
-
Sponsored links:
-
we didn't really give it a go against a team who were no great shakes even given their recent form. We did not look up for it and it was very typical of many of our below par performances this season. We were organised enough to not get out played but we did so little to trouble either their back four or beyond them Given. We lack belief on the field and in the stands but as everyone realises we need better quality as an attackung threat. Those that think it is just one or two that we need are misguided in my opinion. The majority or our players are sound defensively and well disciplined but we are threadbare on forward strategy. I fear we are in a very similar situation (albeit a league better off)as three seasons ago and need a complete overhaul if we are to be taken serioiusly in this division.Taxi_Lad said:surprised how low the scores are generally considering we lost by one flukey goal away to an in-form team
0 -
Interesting and varied marks for Thuram - how would those that were there compare him to Alnwick and Hamer in terms of shot stopping, distribution etc ?0
-
a different style of shot stopping, also he is very quick to leave his line and use any part of his body to get the ball. As for distribution I don't remember him throwing the ball out and most of his kicks were long and flat to one of our players, he did kick directly into touch a couple of times. His one mistake was to misjudge the bounce of the ball, but he wasn't the only one to do that, unfortunately it resulted in a goal.se9addick said:Interesting and varied marks for Thuram - how would those that were there compare him to Alnwick and Hamer in terms of shot stopping, distribution etc ?
When you consider it was his first game in the the UK with an unknown team I'd say he did well and could be better than what we have.3 -
Thuram 6
Wilson 5
Wiggins 5
Morrison 5.5
Wood 6
Cousins 4.5
Stephens 4.5
Jackson 4
Cook 4.5
Harriott 5
Kermorgant 5
Green 5
Church 4.50





