Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Options

****Pitch inspection 10.30am****Postponed****

16781012

Comments

  • Curb_It said:

    Met @Curb_it with @Shag


    Bonus.

    Ha! We had a laugh! Are you on way home? Sat in some sports bar now but I'll never forget this moment!


    Just got home. Longest day ever.
  • edited February 2014

    Curb_It said:

    Met @Curb_it with @Shag


    Bonus.

    Ha! We had a laugh! Are you on way home? Sat in some sports bar now but I'll never forget this moment!


    Just got home. Longest day ever.
    Nah. That'll be 21st June.
  • People who live in glass houses shouldn't throw stones!
  • Addickted said:

    Curb_It said:

    Met @Curb_it with @Shag


    Bonus.

    Ha! We had a laugh! Are you on way home? Sat in some sports bar now but I'll never forget this moment!


    Just got home. Longest day ever.
    Nah. That'll be 21st June.


    So true.
  • Just finished drinking with a few of Sheffield united's top boys... Nice guys. They said they'd meet us in the lion in the next round... If they get a home game.

    Ahem. Wednesday ... Two bob.
  • Curb_It said:

    Just finished drinking with a few of Sheffield united's top boys... Nice guys. They said they'd meet us in the lion in the next round... If they get a home game.

    Ahem. Wednesday ... Two bob.

    Good stamina B!! ;-)
  • edited February 2014
    By the way that last post was a piss take!
  • edited February 2014
    Sheffield Utds firm are dangerous mate, They carry Blades. Watch them lot. Unlike Weds who are bird watchers...lol
  • Well I must say welll done to East Midlands trains for getting us there when south eastern decided that they could not put on any trains till 1100am
    A little disapointed that Wednesday could not have called it off on Friday cause that would have save alot of aggro. I set off at 0645!!!!!
    I will not be able toi go to the replay as can not take anymore annual leave. I think we would have had 2000 up there today @£15 each approx which is £30000.
    Think we will have 500 for the rearrenged game which is £7500
    Would a cover of cost £22500??????
  • Sponsored links:


  • I mean it's not like we don't know that what happened up at Wednesday isn't a possibility

    It can happen at any fixture, forever ....... Clubs would like to give the games the best possibility of going ahead, so unfortunately that means inspections being later
    Otherwise we'll call off loads of games unnecessarily well in advance so as to get rid of the possibilty to ever inconvenience fans

    Could The Wednesday have done more , of course they could have but we had a cover for the Barnsley fixture and it was bright sunshine all Saturday morning yet it was called off at 1.30
    and as piggy says they are affected by a local river in regards where they are situated on the water table (don't think they have fucked up drainage like us)

    Two wrongs don't make a right but I think our fans got a better deal with this postponement than the Barnsley supporters

    Still where would we be with out a weekend to bleat and cry about something



  • So are we going to have another 3 pages of tram related banter for the rearranged game?

    Anyway, I might be able to go to the game on the Tuesday, where do I park :)
  • If it is on the box whatever we lost in gate receipts we will get back in tv money.
  • MSE7 said:

    I blame the ground staff not the ref. that pitch should of been covered by a dome

    Don't you dare blame the ground staff. It's underinvestment for the past 300 years in the pitch! ;-)
  • edited February 2014
    When we got flooded in 2007 it absolutely destroyed both the drainage and the under soil heating, a reported 4m will be needed to rectify this, I'm not sure many clubs could afford that outlay when most of the time it isn't needed.

    I was gutted it was called off, a trip up from Hertfordshire on a Tuesday is not appealing in the slightest.

    I feel sorry for all if you who travelled yesterday.

    Edit : the Blades game will be on, it's dry and bright now.
  • Croydon said:



    Croydon said:

    Sitting in the Leicester services properly pissed off. Are United due to play this weekend? Be a bit embarrassing for the massives if they can get their game on.

    Think they play tomorrow and have the pitch covered.
    I'd expect the wendies on here to go very quiet then. Can't for the life of me work out why you wouldn't have put a cover on with that forecast

    Think in our current position we do not have much room to complain, pots and kettles etc
  • Really sorry for those that travelled, on the bright side, we are in the hat for quarters, rearranged should be on tele

    Can see it coming that the 1/4 finals will pair us with the United/Forest winners, we get our hopes up and Wednesday knock us out. Nailed on there methinks
  • Clattenburg should have got there at 8,30 and made a decision as for as i'm concerned, not only have folk from London has a wasted journey but Wednesday fans from all over the country come to Hillsborough on matchdays too.

    The only think I can think is that Clattenburg gave it till the point of no return and made a decision there and then.

    I have nothing against Clattenburg, don't know why people give him stick.
    However, your right there is no reason why he could not have got to the ground earlier and done the inspection. Suppose he wanted a lie in!
  • When we got flooded in 2007 it absolutely destroyed both the drainage and the under soil heating, a reported 4m will be needed to rectify this, I'm not sure many clubs could afford that outlay when most of the time it isn't needed.

    Like our excuses for the broken drainage under the pitch, I just don't accept that as an excuse. And like us, you've had several years to resolve the situation and haven't.

    You are a professional football club and without a pitch to play on, the whole raison d'etre for your club disappears.

    I expect that on average, the loan players you've had in this year are costing 500k a year each, plus the loan fees - and you've actually bought in 21 new players into the club this season. Several of these players (most of the time) haven't been needed.
  • Sponsored links:


  • Blucher said:

    Hopped off at Chesterfield, like many others, to try and salvage something from the postponement. Had an excellent pub lunch in a very old pub, the Royal Oak and enjoyed the game against Torquay after a tepid first half. A new ground for us, a very friendly bunch of people and, I might add, an excellent pitch (recognising that the ground is only four years old). Hopefully, we shall not be retracing our steps next season because I think Chesterfield are on the way up.

    Must have sorted their pitch out from two years ago. Remember zero communication on their website all week even the weather was freezing. Game got called off around 10.30 as well.
    Just as well Sheff United v Wycombe was on!
  • Our train was at 10:26, we got the news it was called off before we reached the first stop, Leicester. Nonetheless, met a couple of Massives, few blades, and some derby fans, and we had a nice drink until our 1830 train back. Gutting as it was, it's not like we can complain! On the bright side, three games in hand over everyone gives me hope. I know we have to win them, but at least we are in charge of our own fate.
  • Addickted said:

    When we got flooded in 2007 it absolutely destroyed both the drainage and the under soil heating, a reported 4m will be needed to rectify this, I'm not sure many clubs could afford that outlay when most of the time it isn't needed.

    Like our excuses for the broken drainage under the pitch, I just don't accept that as an excuse. And like us, you've had several years to resolve the situation and haven't.

    You are a professional football club and without a pitch to play on, the whole raison d'etre for your club disappears.

    I expect that on average, the loan players you've had in this year are costing 500k a year each, plus the loan fees - and you've actually bought in 21 new players into the club this season. Several of these players (most of the time) haven't been needed.
    Several years without a pot to piss in post 2007 and I don't think Milan will chuck 4m at it, not as he's looking to sell.

    We've had 5 games called off since 2007 and two abandonments, so around 1 a year, would you justify spending it?

    As for bringing players in, we've relied on freebies and loanees to remain being quite frugal.
  • Addickted said:

    When we got flooded in 2007 it absolutely destroyed both the drainage and the under soil heating, a reported 4m will be needed to rectify this, I'm not sure many clubs could afford that outlay when most of the time it isn't needed.

    Like our excuses for the broken drainage under the pitch, I just don't accept that as an excuse. And like us, you've had several years to resolve the situation and haven't.

    You are a professional football club and without a pitch to play on, the whole raison d'etre for your club disappears.

    I expect that on average, the loan players you've had in this year are costing 500k a year each, plus the loan fees - and you've actually bought in 21 new players into the club this season. Several of these players (most of the time) haven't been needed.
    As for bringing players in, we've relied on freebies and loanees to remain being quite frugal.
    Playing your youth team in is frugal.

    Bringing in players like Connor Wickham, who cost you £50k a week in loan fees and salary whilst he was with you isn't.

  • Wendies had a massive injury list, they took a gamble on the game wouldn't be played. It paid off for them.

    They're still going out.
  • Addickted said:

    Addickted said:

    When we got flooded in 2007 it absolutely destroyed both the drainage and the under soil heating, a reported 4m will be needed to rectify this, I'm not sure many clubs could afford that outlay when most of the time it isn't needed.

    Like our excuses for the broken drainage under the pitch, I just don't accept that as an excuse. And like us, you've had several years to resolve the situation and haven't.

    You are a professional football club and without a pitch to play on, the whole raison d'etre for your club disappears.

    I expect that on average, the loan players you've had in this year are costing 500k a year each, plus the loan fees - and you've actually bought in 21 new players into the club this season. Several of these players (most of the time) haven't been needed.
    As for bringing players in, we've relied on freebies and loanees to remain being quite frugal.
    Playing your youth team in is frugal.

    Bringing in players like Connor Wickham, who cost you £50k a week in loan fees and salary whilst he was with you isn't.

    50k a week ??? Really where's that come from
  • Addickted said:

    Addickted said:

    When we got flooded in 2007 it absolutely destroyed both the drainage and the under soil heating, a reported 4m will be needed to rectify this, I'm not sure many clubs could afford that outlay when most of the time it isn't needed.

    Like our excuses for the broken drainage under the pitch, I just don't accept that as an excuse. And like us, you've had several years to resolve the situation and haven't.

    You are a professional football club and without a pitch to play on, the whole raison d'etre for your club disappears.

    I expect that on average, the loan players you've had in this year are costing 500k a year each, plus the loan fees - and you've actually bought in 21 new players into the club this season. Several of these players (most of the time) haven't been needed.
    As for bringing players in, we've relied on freebies and loanees to remain being quite frugal.
    Playing your youth team in is frugal.

    Bringing in players like Connor Wickham, who cost you £50k a week in loan fees and salary whilst he was with you isn't.

    50k a week ??? Really where's that come from
    I think thats a number picked randomly.
  • Addickted said:

    Addickted said:

    When we got flooded in 2007 it absolutely destroyed both the drainage and the under soil heating, a reported 4m will be needed to rectify this, I'm not sure many clubs could afford that outlay when most of the time it isn't needed.

    Like our excuses for the broken drainage under the pitch, I just don't accept that as an excuse. And like us, you've had several years to resolve the situation and haven't.

    You are a professional football club and without a pitch to play on, the whole raison d'etre for your club disappears.

    I expect that on average, the loan players you've had in this year are costing 500k a year each, plus the loan fees - and you've actually bought in 21 new players into the club this season. Several of these players (most of the time) haven't been needed.
    As for bringing players in, we've relied on freebies and loanees to remain being quite frugal.
    Playing your youth team in is frugal.

    Bringing in players like Connor Wickham, who cost you £50k a week in loan fees and salary whilst he was with you isn't.

    50k a week? Ha ha yer off yer tree.

    He cost us less than 10k a week.

  • Not read through the whole thread, but it appears to me that the Wendies did not make a huge amount of effort for this game to go ahead. Maybe that had something to do with the number of injuries and integrating the new loanees into the squad ?

    If Rotheram in League One can go ahead then the Wendies game should be going ahead.

    Charlton knew the rain situation against Birmingham and even with completely fecked drainage the covers went on, Paddy the groundsman got the pitch ready. The Massives have got a big injury list, and is as we know is a massive club and Hillsborough a top notch state of the art ground. Where's the covers ? Was the rain going to be that heavy during the game ?

    I don't know if OP and Owls Admin have acknowledged it earlier but it does look like the Massives were trying to avoid the fixture.
  • Addickted said:

    Addickted said:

    When we got flooded in 2007 it absolutely destroyed both the drainage and the under soil heating, a reported 4m will be needed to rectify this, I'm not sure many clubs could afford that outlay when most of the time it isn't needed.

    Like our excuses for the broken drainage under the pitch, I just don't accept that as an excuse. And like us, you've had several years to resolve the situation and haven't.

    You are a professional football club and without a pitch to play on, the whole raison d'etre for your club disappears.

    I expect that on average, the loan players you've had in this year are costing 500k a year each, plus the loan fees - and you've actually bought in 21 new players into the club this season. Several of these players (most of the time) haven't been needed.
    As for bringing players in, we've relied on freebies and loanees to remain being quite frugal.
    Playing your youth team in is frugal.

    Bringing in players like Connor Wickham, who cost you £50k a week in loan fees and salary whilst he was with you isn't.

    50k a week? Ha ha yer off yer tree.

    He cost us less than 10k a week.

    Doesn't some loans involve a fee as well as wages?
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!