Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Spin of the day ............
IAgree
Posts: 1,846
QPR assistant manager Kevin Bond:
"If you start looking at the table mathematically then we don't get beat at Charlton.
"If you start looking at the table mathematically then we don't get beat at Charlton.
0
Comments
-
1 - 0 = A win for Charlton Kevin.
See Maths ain't that hard.1 -
What a tool0
-
Mathamatically we scored 100% of the goals today.
"The best team always win, the rest is only gossip"0 -
Here's a classic that will need very little translation:
Bond added: “I asked Nedum if it was a penalty and he said it was. I’m not going to be critical of the referee because they have a difficult enough job as it is, but we need those decisions to be right.”
1 -
Just watched the incident in slow mo, no contact whatsoeverseth plum said:Here's a classic that will need very little translation:
Bond added: “I asked Nedum if it was a penalty and he said it was. I’m not going to be critical of the referee because they have a difficult enough job as it is, but we need those decisions to be right.”
2 -
He should have been booked for diving4
-
I said the same Beds.0
-
I was right in line and it was not a penalty, he made a good run but as soon as he got in the penalty area he was looking for it.0
-
exactlyBedsaddick said:He should have been booked for diving
0 -
Sponsored links:
-
Walking up Floyd Road after, always a laugh listening to away fans moaning about 'what a shit ground it is'.
Forgot that Loftus Rd was the new Wembley...3 -
the QPR mug (he better not be an addick ) who thought pressing the emergency stop button the escalators at London bridge was funny, nearly making my little girl fall when it stopped , saying It was a joke, when confronted with her really pissed off dad in the gaps to the nthn line from the platform,
weren't so big and clever then0 -
'Arry turning away when Jackson scored.0
-
1 Leicester City 32 22 5 5 59 32 27 71
2 Burnley 32 17 12 3 50 26 24 63
3 Derby County 32 18 7 7 60 40 20 61
4 Queens Park Rangers 31 16 8 7 37 25 12 56
5 Nottingham Forest 32 14 13 5 53 35 18 55
6 Reading 32 14 8 10 50 37 13 50
7 Wigan Athletic 31 14 7 10 37 29 8 49
8 Brighton and Hove Albion 31 12 10 9 33 27 6 46
9 Blackburn Rovers 31 12 10 9 38 35 3 46
10 Ipswich Town 32 11 12 9 43 37 6 45
11 Leeds United 31 12 7 12 43 39 4 43
12 Watford 32 10 12 10 44 39 5 42
13 Middlesbrough 32 9 13 10 41 36 5 40
14 Huddersfield Town 32 11 7 14 40 44 -4 40
15 Sheffield Wednesday 31 8 12 11 38 38 0 36
16 Birmingham City 32 9 9 14 39 41 -2 36
17 Bournemouth 31 9 9 13 37 51 -14 36
18 Blackpool 32 8 11 13 29 44 -15 35
19 Bolton Wanderers 32 7 12 13 37 49 -12 33
20 Doncaster Rovers 32 7 9 16 28 48 -20 30
21 Millwall 32 6 10 16 31 60 -29 28
22 Charlton Athletic 29 6 9 14 24 38 -14 27
23 Barnsley 31 5 11 15 30 51 -21 26
24 Yeovil Town 31 6 7 18 27 47 -20 25
i started looking at it mathematically and Bond is right.
we lost yesterday 0 v 54 because if you add respective goal differences to difference in points that is how games are worked out in the Championship 2013/14 season.
all those celebrations were for nothing.
congratulations QPR.0 -
That's hilarious, of all the people to complain the mob with the smallest shittiest ground in the league get on their high horse!AFKABartram said:Walking up Floyd Road after, always a laugh listening to away fans moaning about 'what a shit ground it is'.
Forgot that Loftus Rd was the new Wembley...0 -
What the Hell did Bond mean?0
-
I've been wondering that. Does he mean that statistically they shouldn't have lost, because they're higher than us in the table? In the same way that statistically, 1 in 5 people are Chinese; so mathematically, four Premier League teams are made up entirely of Chinese players. I don't know.Kap10 said:What the Hell did Bond mean?
0 -
It's a "no disrespect but we shouldn't be losing to the likes of Charlton" comment but trying to be clever.0
-
It is what he meant, in one of the newspapers reports it gives the quote better context when asked about are they worried about their rivals and the point he was making they have to go out there and win there own games before worrying about others. Would have been easier if he had of said that, clearly been carrying Harry's bags for too longPowell Is Pleasant said:
I've been wondering that. Does he mean that statistically they shouldn't have lost, because they're higher than us in the table? In the same way that statistically, 1 in 5 people are Chinese; so mathematically, four Premier League teams are made up entirely of Chinese players. I don't know.Kap10 said:What the Hell did Bond mean?
0
