Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

STATBANK - Wendies 2-3 Charlton "SORDELL SHOOTS TO THE TOP" plus the A&E Indicator

lancashire lad
lancashire lad Posts: 15,680
in General Charlton
many thanks to the 15 Lifers who gave their marks, averages as follows:

Sordell---------- 8.73 MoM
Harriott----------- 7.37
Poyet------------- 7.17
Solly-------------- 6.99
Fox--------------- 6.93
Cousins----------- 6.93
Jackson----------- 6.77
Ajdarevic---------- 6.67
Dervite------------ 6.63
Hamer------------ 6.40
Morrison---------- 6.10
Church------------ 6.07
Team---6.90

for those who want a bit more: https://us.v-cdn.net/5000498/uploads/FileUpload/59/4555f0ee8d374a9327262a2e03b74e.pdf





image

Comments

  • danny777
    danny777 Posts: 223
    Cort started a couple of games near the beginning of the season (P4 - "cumulative stats for players who received marks in less than 15games")
  • lancashire lad
    lancashire lad Posts: 15,680
    danny777 said:

    Cort started a couple of games near the beginning of the season (P4 - "cumulative stats for players who received marks in less than 15games")

    thanks Danny I'll include him in the next statbank
  • LuckyReds
    LuckyReds Posts: 5,866
    Does the top 6 (Sordell aside, who got a hatrick - so naturally his place is understandable!) make anyone else feel rather proud?

    Harriott, Poyet, Solly, Fox and Cousins. Perfect.
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,449
    Dear LL,

    On behalf of good sense and reason,

    Can you please stop taking Stig Thundercock's obviously spiteful/trollish/hobbyhorsical/ridiculous marks into account when calculating the averages? Sordell should be 8.86 and Ajdarevic far closer to 7.

    I know the player marks are subjective and if we all thought the same it'd be a very dull website, but just look at some of the shit that poster has come out with - his sheer inability to see beyond a grudge and his propensity to handing out absurdly low marks for next to no reason.

    That's me done.
  • JollyRobin
    JollyRobin Posts: 1,706
    image
  • lancashire lad
    lancashire lad Posts: 15,680
    edited April 2014
    Leuth said:

    Dear LL,

    On behalf of good sense and reason,

    Can you please stop taking Stig Thundercock's obviously spiteful/trollish/hobbyhorsical/ridiculous marks into account when calculating the averages? Sordell should be 8.86 and Ajdarevic far closer to 7.

    I know the player marks are subjective and if we all thought the same it'd be a very dull website, but just look at some of the shit that poster has come out with - his sheer inability to see beyond a grudge and his propensity to handing out absurdly low marks for next to no reason.

    That's me done.

    So Leuth should I just ignore Stig Thundercocks' marks for Ajdarevic and Sordell or all his others which are similar to other Lifer's marks? The answer is no I won't ignore then as they are his point of view. Many people mark in different ways and I do not have the right to censor the marks but only to process them for you all to draw your own conclusions on the result.
  • Stig
    Stig Posts: 29,225
    8.73, super score Marvin. From what I can see that's the second best performance go the season. Beaten only by Hamer at Leeds.

Categories

“Marketplace”