Katrien Meire
Comments
-
Unfortunately, the only person with any authority is in Belgium. No one at the club has any, which is in effect, just a branch office.boogica said:
Exactly we don't av anyone at the club giving us Direction total shambles, clear out from top to bottom needed ASAP.calydon_road said:
Were always going to get battered after a joke of a week.Callumcafc said:We don't have to accept it.
Board are wrong if they think we won't go down with same squad and Luzon ..
We have no manager knowledge and no authority out on the training ground. Proper clown dealings on the football side. Luzon took training Thursday and Friday.boogica said:Av a look at the table RD and KM
FFS
U need advice b cos u ain't football people .
Sack manager, get crap new manager, no work permit, get beat 5-0.5 -
.1
-
This content has been removed.
-
This content has been removed.
-
Go and have a nice cup of tea Colin.2
-
.2
-
if you lot don't like it, support another team in the network...3
-
Yes Matthew, Roberts, and Fraeye.colin1961 said:Everyone knows when they hear nothing from the club like last season now we have someone who is hapoy to keep the fans informed and speak to us outside the ground on Match days she gets attacked .... For the record 3 people were talked to about the job other then GL ...so did she lair no !!
No lie there...
5 -
I wasn't referring to your post directly,I hadn't even read it.micks1950 said:
I take it you're referring to my post – although for reasons best known to yourself you choose not to do so directly.Redskin said:Imagine if KM had said...Peeter's position had been scrutinised for the some time and it was decided that unless there was considerable improvement in the following month's results his contract would be terminated, and if that proved to be the case, Luzon would be appointed manager.
We felt there wasn't sufficient improvement during the timescale, and after the Brighton game Peeters was duly sacked. No other managers were considered or interviewed for the post as the decision to hire Luzon had already been made.
People would be complaining about being a feeder club,treated with contempt by the owner etc rather than simply being 'lied' to - a tenuous and pernicious accusation in itself.
I've had the impression that 'entitlement' was solely the preserve of children;it seems that grown men and women are equally as importunate.
“tenuous and pernicious”? Care to try and substantiate that.
The 'tenuous' and 'pernicious' comment concerned the numerous accusations - and not just on this thread - of KM being a liar.
Does anyone have attested proof to substantiate this?
0 -
Yes RD & RM who was the other one?colin1961 said:Everyone knows when they hear nothing from the club like last season now we have someone who is hapoy to keep the fans informed and speak to us outside the ground on Match days she gets attacked .... For the record 3 people were talked to about the job other then GL ...so did she lair no !!
0 - Sponsored links:
-
At least we have Colin to lighten the mood.3
-
Of course she lied - she suggested we would undertake a proper process -then when the mad dictator decided not to, she was in a spot. All this rubbish about 20 applicants coming in and interviewing three - what sort of process is that? It may have happened, but that is not a recruitment process, it is a shambles. Duchatelet may be the problem, but she is not the solution and if we can get her out the club will be none the poorer and he may be irritated. Maybe we should try to take every opportunity we can to irritate him.0
-
It's a pity you didn't read his post. It's a sober summary of the reasons why people feel they were lied to (even if I personally feel the fault lies squarely with RD himself)Redskin said:
I wasn't referring to your post directly,I hadn't even read it.micks1950 said:
I take it you're referring to my post – although for reasons best known to yourself you choose not to do so directly.Redskin said:Imagine if KM had said...Peeter's position had been scrutinised for the some time and it was decided that unless there was considerable improvement in the following month's results his contract would be terminated, and if that proved to be the case, Luzon would be appointed manager.
We felt there wasn't sufficient improvement during the timescale, and after the Brighton game Peeters was duly sacked. No other managers were considered or interviewed for the post as the decision to hire Luzon had already been made.
People would be complaining about being a feeder club,treated with contempt by the owner etc rather than simply being 'lied' to - a tenuous and pernicious accusation in itself.
I've had the impression that 'entitlement' was solely the preserve of children;it seems that grown men and women are equally as importunate.
“tenuous and pernicious”? Care to try and substantiate that.
The 'tenuous' and 'pernicious' comment concerned the numerous accusations - and not just on this thread - of KM being a liar.
Does anyone have attested proof to substantiate this?
2 -
Oops, the mod has been modded. Apologies.3
-
Oh no the unnecessarily long words are coming out. It's a CL bundle!0
-
Was she there today?
0 -
RD does not watch the games, probably thought the club was going to make money and then make a quck buck, he will not make the investment, will not choose an englishmen to manage the club, KM imo is just a puppet for RD, the passion has disappeared and was last seem when CP was their, and prior to that AC.
You need people of the calibre of Jack Hayward (RIP) who put his heart and soul into Wolves, something this club has been missing for years.2 -
This content has been removed.
-
Why people feel they were lied to is not the same as were lied to.PragueAddick said:
It's a pity you didn't read his post. It's a sober summary of the reasons why people feel they were lied to (even if I personally feel the fault lies squarely with RD himself)Redskin said:
I wasn't referring to your post directly,I hadn't even read it.micks1950 said:
I take it you're referring to my post – although for reasons best known to yourself you choose not to do so directly.Redskin said:Imagine if KM had said...Peeter's position had been scrutinised for the some time and it was decided that unless there was considerable improvement in the following month's results his contract would be terminated, and if that proved to be the case, Luzon would be appointed manager.
We felt there wasn't sufficient improvement during the timescale, and after the Brighton game Peeters was duly sacked. No other managers were considered or interviewed for the post as the decision to hire Luzon had already been made.
People would be complaining about being a feeder club,treated with contempt by the owner etc rather than simply being 'lied' to - a tenuous and pernicious accusation in itself.
I've had the impression that 'entitlement' was solely the preserve of children;it seems that grown men and women are equally as importunate.
“tenuous and pernicious”? Care to try and substantiate that.
The 'tenuous' and 'pernicious' comment concerned the numerous accusations - and not just on this thread - of KM being a liar.
Does anyone have attested proof to substantiate this?
Again,who can substantiate this accusation with actual proof?
I'll tell you who:no-one,and rumour,probability and conjecture don't count as proof.
2 - Sponsored links:
-
But...but...they are streamed directly to Belgium!!!StanTheMan said:RD does not watch the games, probably thought the club was going to make money and then make a quck buck, he will not make the investment, will not choose an englishmen to manage the club, KM imo is just a puppet for RD, the passion has disappeared and was last seem when CP was their, and prior to that AC.
You need people of the calibre of Jack Hayward (RIP) who put his heart and soul into Wolves, something this club has been missing for years.
Agree re: Hayward, a REAL owner, old school style. Sadly people like Sir Jack are a thing of the past.0 -
Sure but as we said in the Trust statement, football is a purchase driven by emotion. In this case, perceptions, what people feel, are more important than a legal definition.Redskin said:
Why people feel they were lied to is not the same as were lied to.PragueAddick said:
It's a pity you didn't read his post. It's a sober summary of the reasons why people feel they were lied to (even if I personally feel the fault lies squarely with RD himself)Redskin said:
I wasn't referring to your post directly,I hadn't even read it.micks1950 said:
I take it you're referring to my post – although for reasons best known to yourself you choose not to do so directly.Redskin said:Imagine if KM had said...Peeter's position had been scrutinised for the some time and it was decided that unless there was considerable improvement in the following month's results his contract would be terminated, and if that proved to be the case, Luzon would be appointed manager.
We felt there wasn't sufficient improvement during the timescale, and after the Brighton game Peeters was duly sacked. No other managers were considered or interviewed for the post as the decision to hire Luzon had already been made.
People would be complaining about being a feeder club,treated with contempt by the owner etc rather than simply being 'lied' to - a tenuous and pernicious accusation in itself.
I've had the impression that 'entitlement' was solely the preserve of children;it seems that grown men and women are equally as importunate.
“tenuous and pernicious”? Care to try and substantiate that.
The 'tenuous' and 'pernicious' comment concerned the numerous accusations - and not just on this thread - of KM being a liar.
Does anyone have attested proof to substantiate this?
Again,who can substantiate this accusation with actual proof?
I'll tell you who:no-one,and rumour,probability and conjecture don't count as proof.
0 -
£40m? Roland should sell up now, he's just doubled his money in 12 months!colin1961 said:So who going to buy us then .... Tell me who the saviour is with 40 mill in his back pocket ..... Answer no one just like last year
3 -
-
Forget about 'legal definition' here,that's glib; what you are suggesting is that because football is emotive, people's 'perceptions' are more important than the truth.PragueAddick said:
Sure but as we said in the Trust statement, football is a purchase driven by emotion. In this case, perceptions, what people feel, are more important than a legal definition.Redskin said:
Why people feel they were lied to is not the same as were lied to.PragueAddick said:
It's a pity you didn't read his post. It's a sober summary of the reasons why people feel they were lied to (even if I personally feel the fault lies squarely with RD himself)Redskin said:
I wasn't referring to your post directly,I hadn't even read it.micks1950 said:
I take it you're referring to my post – although for reasons best known to yourself you choose not to do so directly.Redskin said:Imagine if KM had said...Peeter's position had been scrutinised for the some time and it was decided that unless there was considerable improvement in the following month's results his contract would be terminated, and if that proved to be the case, Luzon would be appointed manager.
We felt there wasn't sufficient improvement during the timescale, and after the Brighton game Peeters was duly sacked. No other managers were considered or interviewed for the post as the decision to hire Luzon had already been made.
People would be complaining about being a feeder club,treated with contempt by the owner etc rather than simply being 'lied' to - a tenuous and pernicious accusation in itself.
I've had the impression that 'entitlement' was solely the preserve of children;it seems that grown men and women are equally as importunate.
“tenuous and pernicious”? Care to try and substantiate that.
The 'tenuous' and 'pernicious' comment concerned the numerous accusations - and not just on this thread - of KM being a liar.
Does anyone have attested proof to substantiate this?
Again,who can substantiate this accusation with actual proof?
I'll tell you who:no-one,and rumour,probability and conjecture don't count as proof.
1 -
Just because she smiles and talks to you, doesn't mean that she is informing you. Get real she is Roland's puppet (no doubt a well paid one). This great club of ours is being dragged down by this crazy experiment. Why can't you see it.colin1961 said:Everyone knows when they hear nothing from the club like last season now we have someone who is hapoy to keep the fans informed and speak to us outside the ground on Match days she gets attacked .... For the record 3 people were talked to about the job other then GL ...so did she lair no !!
Informed? she completely misinformed.
5 -
Didn't she say on SSN that no Brits were considered for the post?PragueAddick said:
Yes Matthew, Roberts, and Fraeye.colin1961 said:Everyone knows when they hear nothing from the club like last season now we have someone who is hapoy to keep the fans informed and speak to us outside the ground on Match days she gets attacked .... For the record 3 people were talked to about the job other then GL ...so did she lair no !!
No lie there...0 -
RM should go sold us to MJ and TJ then it went downhill.Roland needs to spend on new players no more network players.0
-
It was hard to tell. The question went something like 'can you tell us if any of those considered were British' her reply was 'no'. So was that 'no' I can't tell you or 'no' there were none considered.harveys gardener said:
Didn't she say on SSN that no Brits were considered for the post?PragueAddick said:
Yes Matthew, Roberts, and Fraeye.colin1961 said:Everyone knows when they hear nothing from the club like last season now we have someone who is hapoy to keep the fans informed and speak to us outside the ground on Match days she gets attacked .... For the record 3 people were talked to about the job other then GL ...so did she lair no !!
No lie there...2
