New signing? Vaz Te? (ed. Signed until end of season)

The_President said:

Can i be the first/last to say.....underwhelmed.

Six-a-bag-of-nuts said:

I must say I am quite excited by this.
Probably turn out to be misplaced, but if he produces what we know he's capable of it can only be good.

I fancy him to star in a shock 3-1 win away at Birmingham which will rejuvenate our belief and enthusiasm and take the legs away from the planned protest against Ipswich; a game which we will lose 6-0 sending the "anti's" into an apoplectic rage on CL against the regime and the apathetic majority.
The apathetic majority decide to stick one to the regime with literally tens of people boycotting on a cumulative game by game basis over a prolonged period of time.
I'm sorry, I don't know where that came from

Six-a-bag-of-nuts said:

soapboxsam said:

Six-a-bag-of-nuts said:

I must say I am quite excited by this.
Probably turn out to be misplaced, but if he produces what we know he's capable of it can only be good.

I fancy him to star in a shock 3-1 win away at Birmingham which will rejuvenate our belief and enthusiasm and take the legs away from the planned protest against Ipswich; a game which we will lose 6-0 sending the "anti's" into an apoplectic rage on CL against the regime and the apathetic majority.
The apathetic majority decide to stick one to the regime with literally tens of people boycotting on a cumulative game by game basis over a prolonged period of time.
I'm sorry, I don't know where that came from

I think you're Nuts; or 1 bag short of the half dozen

Aren't we all Soapy?

AddicksAddict said:

Covered End said:

harveys gardener said:

We need a player who can impose himself on defences and perhaps score a few. Not a chancer. Not a 6'7" basketball player with few footballing skills. YK or a younger, cheaper version? Ciftci still not starting for Celtic.

I fail to understand how you can be wrong so often. Do you actually watch the games sober ? Apologies, but I find it unbelieveable. The only games we've won this season, were the games that Makienok played 90 mins in.

The number of games played is too low to be statistically meaningful, and you can't deduce that we won because Makienok played 90mins anymore than you can say Makienok played 90mins because we were winning so we didn't need to take him off. However, that doesn't detract from how well he played in the Wendies game, nor does it excuse how poor he was in other games.

Chris_from_Sidcup said:

Its_Hamer_Time said:

superchrissypowell said:

Its_Hamer_Time said:

I don't quite understand the 'good player at this level'. Wasn't it nearly 5 years ago he was decent at this level? He's barely played any football. Underwhelmed with this, but beggars can't be choosers I guess.

After looking at the stats, sorry is was 2011/12 he was decent at this level with Barnsley then West Ham - still not sure on him.

And then subsequently he played in the premier league for West Ham. So he was decent at a higher level more recently.

Was he decent? Or was he playing from the subs bench because he wasn't 'decent'? Look a this career, he's had one 'decent' full season! The Premiership season wasn't it.

A premier league sub is still way above the level we're currently operating at

king addick said:

Personally i think its a good signing, he may not be fit now but if he does hit the ground running like he said then happy days.
Being a free agent he is obviously a lot cheaper so RD will be chuffed but at least he does have some quality..im sure there are a lot worse out there!

ross1 said:

He went to Rotherham before us, why he did not join, we may never know but they have now signed Leon Best, will be interesting to see who gets the better deal