*****C.A.R.D PETITION - 'WE WANT OUR CHARLTON BACK' *****

Signed & shared on Facebook

Over 1600 now.....come all lets spread the word!!

Signed ....first time I ve been proud to say I am a supporter for the last couple of years

1903: Who's going to be special number 1905???

Signed

Lol...just signed and one of the recent signatories was a certain Katrien M!!!

Is our fragrant one angling for compulsory redundancy perhaps?

2 grand is amazing in less than 24 hours. But we need more - 20grand, 200 grand......

Signed

stilladdicted said:

Signed and shared. Non football friends are joining in.

Meant to say it sooner but welcome back, Anni !

When we think we have reached a suitable number we might want to 'present' the petition to Roland and the representatives of his political project in Belgium, Vivant.

Just been on their website and saw one of their key policies is 'direct democracy'. This is a translation of what they say that means


"The referendum is a good instrument to express the will of the people. It is important that the outcome of such a referendum is binding: if that is not the case, it is merely a costly survey on opinions, which still can be ignored. Another very important advantage is that the organization of referenda cranking the debate. They give rise to the creation and dissemination of information, from all angles and positions.

What if we implement the binding referendum on popular initiative?

There will be real, for direct democracy. The power shifts again from the extended political parties to the public.
The gap between politics and citizens will finally be reduced, since there is reintroduced a close, ongoing dialogue.
Referendums bring more articulate, better informed and engaged citizens. And thus indirectly to a better quality of democracy.
The political work is not so much running to power conservation and conservatism, but more in line with current social issues. It is therefore more efficient.
There will be a learning process. Citizens will obviously make bad decisions. But the link between their choices and the outcome and the outcome of those choices becomes clearer."

Signed and shared

Paolo47 said:

When we think we have reached a suitable number we might want to 'present' the petition to Roland and the representatives of his political project in Belgium, Vivant.

Just been on their website and saw one of their key policies is 'direct democracy'. This is a translation of what they say that means


"The referendum is a good instrument to express the will of the people. It is important that the outcome of such a referendum is binding: if that is not the case, it is merely a costly survey on opinions, which still can be ignored. Another very important advantage is that the organization of referenda cranking the debate. They give rise to the creation and dissemination of information, from all angles and positions.

What if we implement the binding referendum on popular initiative?

There will be real, for direct democracy. The power shifts again from the extended political parties to the public.
The gap between politics and citizens will finally be reduced, since there is reintroduced a close, ongoing dialogue.
Referendums bring more articulate, better informed and engaged citizens. And thus indirectly to a better quality of democracy.
The political work is not so much running to power conservation and conservatism, but more in line with current social issues. It is therefore more efficient.
There will be a learning process. Citizens will obviously make bad decisions. But the link between their choices and the outcome and the outcome of those choices becomes clearer."

Superb.

So Douchebag's treatment of Charlton Athletic and the Charlton fans, is the polar opposite of his key poitical policies.

Surely another angle for the Trust/press/b&w campaign etc etc.

Especially, get this into the Belgian press, for those that have contacts.

Gone past 3k ...

Signed, sealed, delivered