Stadium Safety Certificate
I wasn't there today, so only going by what I saw on Twitter...
CAFC can't do anything in the ground for paying customers without a safety certificate from the local authority.
I'd wager that the netting in front of the Lower North, by virtue of the fact it appeared to be blocking the emergency exit route onto the pitch, was clearly a breach of the certificate.
Not being able to control the crowd and having multiple flares thrown onto the pitch must surely also bring things into question.
If we're truly attempting to get the #1stGameOff, then I believe a safety complaint to the licensing authority (Greenwich council) may be a good start.
Comments
-
The Safety Advisory Group, Chaired by Greenwich Council, meets on 14th June.
There are currently two fans representatives on this group.
It would be useful if examples of H&S incidents and issues could be recorded on this thread to ensure they are brought to the attention of the Group, which includes a representative from The Sports Grounds Safety Authority, who was also present at today's game.6 -
"Safety of spectators is nothing to do with the FL, although I gather they were pushing for such measures today. The council is the relevant authority. In fact, the pitch is not an escape route and given the net was placed to allow access to the track I can't see it was a crowd safety issue, to be honest."
Always helpful to hear from AB's POV (from another thread)
@Airman Brown0 -
Charlton disabled supporters were prevented from leaving the top of the North East quad at the end of the match, surely that's a safety issue?
Lifts turned off/not usable0 -
BDL's radio mike was turned off post match so he was unable to make any announcements to the crowd.0
-
Although the post-match pitch invasion was friendly (from a fans point of view) it could have gone horribly wrong, because the home and away fans ran on and met in the middle - with the stewards and police only chasing the home fans. If it had turned ugly, home fans would probably have come off like the sofa did.3
-
This.TeslaGirl said:Although the post-match pitch invasion was friendly (from a fans point of view) it could have gone horribly wrong, because the home and away fans ran on and met in the middle - with the stewards and police only chasing the home fans. If it had turned ugly, home fans would probably have come off like the sofa did.
Ineffective stewarding allowed both sets of fans in the pitch. It's a credit to those fans that it was a good natured meeting between them. I suspect that in many other circumstances it could have really kicked off.4 -
The question has to be asked about the training of the Blue vest stewards (SIA accreditation would be lost for that behaviour if any of them even had it) and the fact that that the video will show them targeting Charlton supporters whilst Burnley supporters were allowed free access. If they were employed by the club to target our support rather than generally keep order, then the actions of the Metropolitan police in allowing this to happen should be brought into question.
I am dismayed that it has come to this and like many other supporters will not spend another penny in the valley if the money is being spent on attacking our own support. Richard Murray should hang his head in shame. He assumed the role of liaison with the support and is undertaking this with the support of a rent a thug brigade of blue vest vigilantes. His resignation is the least he can offer.
15 -
After the game I walked round from the upper north to the lower west to meet @telmc32. As I went to go through I was stopped my two stewards, who wouldn't let me in. I told them I had just come out and had left my wallet in there. I was told it was the law of the land that I couldn't entry. I told them the law is an ass. I went passed them, they said they would call security, I told them I think they got more problems than a lost wallet. With that they then closed the exit gate, thus stopping others from leaving other than through a small single person gate.0
-
A Burnley guy made it just about onto the edge of the pitch with his daughter who had an inflatable cup. They weren't running into the pitch they were trying to get to the corner flag.
Promptly pulled to one side by blue hi vis and saw them in the car park with the same tosser holding the guy who was explaining his daughter had been sick in the crush caused at the front of the Jimmy seed by the stewards forcing the gates back shut when hundreds of Burnley were pouring through.
Crazy actions on the gates, crazy to stop this one guy and his daughter who were clearly soft targets and then everyone else on the pitch is all fine.1 -
Next fans forum minutes will make for interesting reading. Can someone compile a list of all the appalling behavior by the club from various threads. They need to be held to account.7
-
Sponsored links:
-
They'll just pretend nothing untoward happened and move swiftly on to the next item on the agenda.harveys gardener said:Next fans forum minutes will make for interesting reading. Can someone compile a list of all the appalling behavior by the club from various threads. They need to be held to account.
0 -
They really are a joke. They were never going to take on blokes who could clearly look after themselves but target a father and daughter. Absolute tossers.Alwaysneil said:A Burnley guy made it just about onto the edge of the pitch with his daughter who had an inflatable cup. They weren't running into the pitch they were trying to get to the corner flag.
Promptly pulled to one side by blue hi vis and saw them in the car park with the same tosser holding the guy who was explaining his daughter had been sick in the crush caused at the front of the Jimmy seed by the stewards forcing the gates back shut when hundreds of Burnley were pouring through.
Crazy actions on the gates, crazy to stop this one guy and his daughter who were clearly soft targets and then everyone else on the pitch is all fine.
0







