Katrien Meire what is ultimately stopping you from resigning?
Comments
-
I didn't say good politician!JohnnyH2 said:
Good politicians never tell the truth but can never be accused of lying from what they actually say.Brendan_O_Connell said:She'd make it as a politician, trying to put a spin on everything and blame everyone else but herself.
She is a terrible liar
0 -
Can't stand the woman and hope she soon departs The Valley and never returns.
That said, how pathetic does all this make Duchatalet? What kind of man leaves his underlings (regardless of sex) to face a daily torrent of public and private abuse without once intervening? Sure, it's his cash and his club to play with, but as a man what a lamentable example he is.0 -
I think it's likely having considered the facts that Roland is a eunuch. He certainly has no balls.0
-
Just out of interest, are you called Matt Tees, or is your username just a long version of mates, a bit like "duuddees"?Matttees said:I don't know what's happening to me but I,m beginning to feel sorry for KM.
I just want to give her a big hug and say there there don't worry put your dummy back in and daddy Roly will make it all better.
awww diddums.1 -
Roland is a coward that gets a sense of pleasure from the power of being universally disliked. I 'm sure he would love to be a dictator. Of course he likes to do it from his bunker, and that is the cowardly bit. I would say to the coward, come over here and face us you pathetic wimp!1
-
What does the last sentence mean ?masicat said:She will be here until Duchalet allows her to leave. I have been told that and have no reason to disbelieve the person who told me. She is employed by him and if she leaves Charlton will take another position for him.
0 -
It would be brilliant if the employees rounded on her and anonymously sent a vote of no confidence to Roland.0
-
She has a few brown tonguers in there you know!0
-
It is only now that I realise what a lot of boring people we had as CEO's before KM. How many of them can be named and what interesting facts can be told about them, compared to KM, they were hardly in the news and only talked about the club. At least she gives us something to talk about until next season starts. Keep putting your foot in your mouth KM it is all good and normally original as I would not think any other CEO anywhere has caused as much annoyance and interest as you0
-
I agree, why worry about keeping Charlton's issues in the news and the anti-regime ball rolling with the national press when you have Katrien onside to assist?
0 -
Sponsored links:
-
Her superhero identity is that of Wonderwhatthenextself-inflicteddisasterwillbe Woman, using her amazing powers to demonstrate that in today's world even the hard of thinking can make their mark....Missed It said:The only explanation that I can possibly think of is that 'Katrien Meire' is her superhero secret identity and she is actually completely fireproof, bulletproof and indestructible!!
Resign now Katrien, your secret is out! Go and save the world somewhere else!1 -
The next CEO we get will roll in the valley on a Harley Davidson giving the Charlton faithful hand gesturesross1 said:It is only now that I realise what a lot of boring people we had as CEO's before KM. How many of them can be named and what interesting facts can be told about them, compared to KM, they were hardly in the news and only talked about the club. At least she gives us something to talk about until next season starts. Keep putting your foot in your mouth KM it is all good and normally original as I would not think any other CEO anywhere has caused as much annoyance and interest as you
0 -
Wonderful performance from Myers on the fans forum a few months back.MuttleyCAFC said:She has a few brown tonguers in there you know!
0 -
Another Google scrub today. Good money and time well spent.0
-
£2k-£7k it's believed to cost for a good regular monitor and scrub of your online 'reputation'. If she's spending that RD must be paying her a pretty penny for this job.Alwaysneil said:Another Google scrub today. Good money and time well spent.
0 -
I do hope he's not paying but you are probably right. She has to be tidying it up to ready herself for being on the market as she hasn't bothered before.Atletico Addick said:
£2k-£7k it's believed to cost for a good regular monitor and scrub of your online 'reputation'. If she's spending that RD must be paying her a pretty penny for this job.Alwaysneil said:Another Google scrub today. Good money and time well spent.
0 -
Furthermore it's actually morally wrong that this can be done but once again money talks.stonemuse said:
I do hope he's not paying but you are probably right. She has to be tidying it up to ready herself for being on the market as she hasn't bothered before.Atletico Addick said:
£2k-£7k it's believed to cost for a good regular monitor and scrub of your online 'reputation'. If she's spending that RD must be paying her a pretty penny for this job.Alwaysneil said:Another Google scrub today. Good money and time well spent.
0 -
Per scrub or per year?
It's definitely happening on a more or less daily basis right now.0 -
She can't scrub Twitter or Linkedin...0
-
I wonder if there's any way we can put in an application to Google to stop such 'cleansing' ...anyone know?Alwaysneil said:Per scrub or per year?
It's definitely happening on a more or less daily basis right now.0 -
Sponsored links:
-
CARD can use Google ads perhaps.stonemuse said:
I wonder if there's any way we can put in an application to Google to stop such 'cleansing' ...anyone know?Alwaysneil said:Per scrub or per year?
It's definitely happening on a more or less daily basis right now.0 -
We just need to work harder!Atletico Addick said:
£2k-£7k it's believed to cost for a good regular monitor and scrub of your online 'reputation'. If she's spending that RD must be paying her a pretty penny for this job.Alwaysneil said:Another Google scrub today. Good money and time well spent.
0 -
No idea. I know the ruling and I agree that in limited circumstances people should be able to take stuff off search engines.
This is an abuse of that law.
0 -
For it regularly, probably some sort of deal ala pay the higher end of our quote and we'll give you plenty when you require them. It's a loophole as per in Google and there's a few different ways to do it apparently.Alwaysneil said:Per scrub or per year?
It's definitely happening on a more or less daily basis right now.
We're in it for the long haul so she's just wasting time and money, her best scrub would be to cut her losses and hide elsewhere in Roly's network. Right now all she is doing is putting the windscreen wipers on amidst a storm, a storm that won't soon end.1 -
Precisely, there must be some way to make a complaintAlwaysneil said:No idea. I know the ruling and I agree that in limited circumstances people should be able to take stuff off search engines.
This is an abuse of that law.0 -
I Googled her name yesterday and again just now and a fair number of the historic negative articles have indeed disappeared. Most results of from yesterday. I've worked with Google and without intervention such recent articles would not swamp results.
Clearly she is trying to rewrite history and hide the mass of negative independent media comment. As ever, a class act.0 -
Even if she is scrubbing, it's costing her, or someone money. Let's keep going. Keep mentioniny her full name on here, comments on news sites, Facebook, Twitter etc. She'll run out of money eventually.1
-
Enough of us to keep this in full momentum so fully agree.The Red Robin said:Even if she is scrubbing, it's costing her, or someone money. Let's keep going. Keep mentioniny her full name on here, comments on news sites, Facebook, Twitter etc. She'll run out of money eventually.
1 -
The U.K. Information Commissioners office is apparently the governing body.0
-
Seems it can be done a lot cheaper than the price I've said, I'm guessing as with anything the more people that find out to do such a task, the cheaper it will get.
'Since the first big site, Reputation.com, launched in 2006, the business of online reputation management has grown exponentially. Reputation.com, which offers a “Reputation Defender” product that starts at $250 per month, now has 1.6 million customers in over 100 countries alone.'
Hard to know where it all stands legally, but it's certainly not very acceptable. She is probably doing it because if she is moved on, she needs to pursue a career in something that involves trust, being a Lawyer of course does involve an element of trust.2











