Dialogue with KM
She serves no purpose whatsoever other than to help destroy our club. A ludicrous deluded woman who lost touch with reality a long time ago and is indulged in her fantasy by RD.
Comments
-
I have tried to email her a few times, nothing back yet48
-
Maybe we could arrange a fake seminar on the ins and outs of running a football club,charge her two grand to attend and then ask her some probing questions.23
-
I expect she's been told to keep a low profile to avoid continuously putting her foot in her mouth.
No point in complaining she won't speak if we complain every time she speaks.1 -
EDIT Wrong thread!
Katrien probably doesn't care about the Kent score!9 -
She could and should have spoken to people in informal settings and formal settings.Swisdom said:I expect she's been told to keep a low profile to avoid continuously putting her foot in her mouth.
No point in complaining she won't speak if we complain every time she speaks.
She could and should have tried to address people's concerns, admit mistakes and explain what she is doing to rectify them.
Instead she has tried to pack out meetings to avoid being asked too many questions, insisted she is right when clearly she isn't ("all the managers have proved to be a success") and has ignored her Head of Comms and PR advisor. Both have now left.
She has never formulated a consistent, positive narrative about the future of the club and has constantly been caught out in the most obvious lies.
I'll complain as much as I want while such an incompetent is running my club.
She has destroyed any credibility or goodwill she had (and she did have a lot early on) with her lies and insistence that she has never been wrong.
And her body language and tone of voice in those meetings are terrible, something her Head of Comms told her to her face but she has ignored.
But I agree there is little point in asking her to communicate any more.
All I want to her from her is "I'm leaving"31 -
Oh, she could probably become CEO of Kent and make them worse. On reflection, probably notLenGlover said:EDIT Wrong thread!
Katrien probably doesn't care about the Kent score!
2 -
Dialogue with KM ? If we were proper customers we'd take our business elsewhere if we are dissatisfied. She's the CEO of a company that we assume wants to sell its product to the public, surely it's down to her to find ways to communicate to her customers if there is a problem, not the other way around. Clearly we are all weird.0
-
The Nearly Washington Post has some useful tips...
The Pinocchio Test
Where possible, we will adopt the following standard in fact-checking the claims of a football club owner, diplomat or Katrien Meire.
We do make some allowance for statements made in live interviews, as opposed to a prepared text. We will judge more harshly statements from a prepared text, on the grounds that KM and Mandy had time to discuss the statistic. We also make allowances if Katrien Meire acknowledges an error was made. Finally, we also have a feature called “Recidivism Watch,” which highlights claims repeated by even though the claim has been previously debunked
The WP Pinocchio Scoring system is in this article .....
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/fact-checker/about-the-fact-checker/
0 -
What dialogue. Her victim monologue has been done in the national press, but we know the truth so it won't carry much weight here. Apart from that, most of her communications seem littered with untruths and deciet, or simply corporate nothings that sound okay but have no substance or intent. She is the mouthpiece of a liar and an incompetent, and there is no point in having any sort of dialogue. Look at the Chris Wilder episode. He wanted guarantees, she offered them but then Roland refused to put them in writing, according to many reports. Why would that not occur with the fans?1
-
Sponsored links:
-
We complain!Swisdom said:I expect she's been told to keep a low profile to avoid continuously putting her foot in her mouth.
No point in complaining she won't speak if we complain every time she speaks.
How defensive is that - we only complain because she has not managed to provide a fair and truthful response to any of the questions that have been posed. You make it sound like it is our fault.4 -
I fecking warned you "Canters" was sniffing around your bird, but would you listen?cabbles said:I have tried to email her a few times, nothing back yet
I'm sorry but you've only yourself to blame.
Try Karen Brady, although don't mention her new place and how your a taxpayer and certainly don't take her for a weekend in "Prague" that could kill your chances stone dead.
3 -
I think that this is the case yes. Her own perception that the Club is being run on a sound footing was confirmed by her challenge to the Panel at the Telegraph Sports meeting when it was suggested that examples of badly run clubs included Charlton.hoof_it_up_to_benty said:We need to accept there will never be any meaningful dialogue with her as she's unable to listen to anyone who is critical. She genuinely believes she's doing a good job and won't entertain any other views.
She serves no purpose whatsoever other than to help destroy our club. A ludicrous deluded woman who lost touch with reality a long time ago and is indulged in her fantasy by RD.
When she asked 'Why do you think our club is not run properly' the Telegraph journalist Jim White responded to this in his later published article with Well, where do you start?' and proceeded to demolish Meire's rose-tinted and increasingly deluded view not only of recent events but her part in them which might be summed up as, Yes, unfortunate and disappointing to be relegated but these things happen and it was nothing to do with me and it wasn't my fault!
So, all bridges have been burnt and there is indeed no dialogue to be had with Meire, quite frankly who would want to now?
CAST have accepted this state of affairs and have begun instead to attempt to call Meire to account for her atrocious behaviour as CEO in making comments which only serve to inflame (see other thread CAST to consider FA action).
Now that we have reached this state (i.e, that there is no point in trying to talk reason with Meire), it is high time that she is called publicly to account for the damage she has done to this club (some of it irreparable) and to be made aware that her arrogant, highly dismissive attitude will not be tolerated.
She is a discredited, deluded fantasist propped up only by an equally deluded pseudo-visionary.
That she simply cannot see any of this defies reason and makes a total mockery of the five years of supposed first class analytical training and education provided to her by her prestigious University in Leuven.
What the hell was doing there all that time?
8 -
Maybe we could arrange a séance to get rid of the evil spirits from the club.addick1965 said:Maybe we could arrange a fake seminar on the ins and outs of running a football club,charge her two grand to attend and then ask her some probing questions.
0 -
Meire appears more concerned with managing her reputation on line & outside engagements then effectively managing the club (& then having a good reputation at Charlton).
2 -
maybe not !......LenGlover said:EDIT Wrong thread!
Katrien probably doesn't care about the Kent score!
https://www.cricket-belgium.com/club-stcc/
0 -
So, I gather that you do not rate her as a CEO?Coyotejohn1947 said:
I think that this is the case yes. Her own perception that the Club is being run on a sound footing was confirmed by her challenge to the Panel at the Telegraph Sports meeting when it was suggested that examples of badly run clubs included Charlton.hoof_it_up_to_benty said:We need to accept there will never be any meaningful dialogue with her as she's unable to listen to anyone who is critical. She genuinely believes she's doing a good job and won't entertain any other views.
She serves no purpose whatsoever other than to help destroy our club. A ludicrous deluded woman who lost touch with reality a long time ago and is indulged in her fantasy by RD.
When she asked 'Why do you think our club is not run properly' the Telegraph journalist Jim White responded to this in his later published article with Well, where do you start?' and proceeded to demolish Meire's rose-tinted and increasingly deluded view not only of recent events but her part in them which might be summed up as, Yes, unfortunate and disappointing to be relegated but these things happen and it was nothing to do with me and it wasn't my fault!
So, all bridges have been burnt and there is indeed no dialogue to be had with Meire, quite frankly who would want to now?
CAST have accepted this state of affairs and have begun instead to attempt to call Meire to account for her atrocious behaviour as CEO in making comments which only serve to inflame (see other thread CAST to consider FA action).
Now that we have reached this state (i.e, that there is no point in trying to talk reason with Meire), it is high time that she is called publicly to account for the damage she has done to this club (some of it irreparable) and to be made aware that her arrogant, highly dismissive attitude will not be tolerated.
She is a discredited, deluded fantasist propped up only by an equally deluded pseudo-visionary.
That she simply cannot see any of this defies reason and makes a total mockery of the five years of supposed first class analytical training and education provided to her by her prestigious University in Leuven.
What the hell was doing there all that time?0 -
Actually, I think a lot of us would like to have heard her speak some more if it was going to be meaningful. But that point has probably now long gone.Swisdom said:I expect she's been told to keep a low profile to avoid continuously putting her foot in her mouth.
No point in complaining she won't speak if we complain every time she speaks.
To be clear though. It's not the talking bit that most of us have ever had a problem with, it's the talking shit bit!0 -
Dialogue with KM is pointless, because there seems to be a huge gulf between what she thinks her job is, and what we think it is.
And an even greater gap between her perception and ours, as to her abilities and effectiveness in that role.
She plays at being CEO, the same way as RD plays at being an owner of a football club.
Why waste any more time trying to talk to either of them?1 -
spot on benty, spot on.hoof_it_up_to_benty said:We need to accept there will never be any meaningful dialogue with her as she's unable to listen to anyone who is critical. She genuinely believes she's doing a good job and won't entertain any other views.
She serves no purpose whatsoever other than to help destroy our club. A ludicrous deluded woman who lost touch with reality a long time ago and is indulged in her fantasy by RD.0












