Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Poll - Do you want KM to retract her comments or do you want to know what is in the emails?

2

Comments

  • Johnnysummers5
    Johnnysummers5 Posts: 8,469
    She will blame Richard or Bill Murray saying she was Lost In Translation
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,089
    Retract
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,327
    Not for the sake of @colin1961 as he is beyond hope but Varney isn't going to tell us who the potential buyer is.

    Varney has already refuted the lie that his backers wanted to leave the Valley.

    What I suspect the emails will reveal is that Roland IS willing to sell and was talking to PDV about just that thus blowing out of the water RD and KMs statements that "the club's not for sale".
  • HantsAddick
    HantsAddick Posts: 2,423
    Whichever gets her out of our club the quickest! Followed by RD.
  • Swisdom
    Swisdom Posts: 14,977

    Way too much assumption about what's in the emails. They won't disclose the buyer, which is the point. She doesn't know.

    I don't care for too much detail - just the knowledge that there is discussion is enough to appease a lot of fans. Previously it was not even entertained whereas the implication is that there might be more than meets the eye.

  • Friend Or Defoe
    Friend Or Defoe Posts: 18,128
    Emails, it will make her look like a bigger idiot and to be honest would be more funny!
  • HarryLime
    HarryLime Posts: 1,295
    LuckyReds said:

    Dazzler21 said:

    Emails, I don't care if she retracts her comments.

    I want to see her humiliated, even more so than when she last humiliated herself at that sports business expo.

    Whens the Football League CEOs piss-up in Portugal again? Some embarassment just before then would be beautiful.
    I think it starts tomorrow (9th), so there will be no time for a retraction even if she wanted to, bags don't get packed by themselves you know.
  • BowieAddick
    BowieAddick Posts: 1,192
    Hopefully she is packing for more than a couple of days
  • Mackle
    Mackle Posts: 444
    Didn't Roland sell STVV, but retain ownership of the ground that they play at?

    Maybe it's something along those lines, Duchatelet will sell the club but not the ground, and KM is putting 2 and 2 together to get 22?
  • CAFCsayer
    CAFCsayer Posts: 10,253
    Emails

  • Sponsored links:



  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 32,698
    colin1961 said:

    Varney won't and can't show all paperwork of the proposal because most of it will be secret like the name of the buyers , price all the legal stuff .....
    So whatever he puts up won't prove anything because he will have to withhold certain aspects of the offer and who to say the buyers did not put that into the proposal ??

    If his backers are happy then he is entitled to release what he wants to prove he isn't lying. Katie has the chance to retract her statement and avoid him doing so. If she doesn't then it means she stands by what she said and PV is entitled to defend himself in whatever way he sees fit.

    Like the rest of us you don't know who his backers are, what the offer is, how much it is etc so don't pretend you do. A little while ago you were saying their were no buyers, no one would buy us in League One and yet now we know that is totally not the case.

  • Swisdom
    Swisdom Posts: 14,977
    Some people (not me) do know who the backers are and what the offer was for. And it was not just "a bit of sponsorship" or "naming rights of a stand"

  • She should retract, though the vast majority of Charlton fans will know who the liar is, so he shouldn't need to release the e-mails.
  • She should retract her comments and issue Peter Varney will a grovelling apology.

    For most people this would be very embarrassing, but she has no shame and will continue like everything is normal.
  • Emails as she will weasel out of any blame if she even does retract by using the misrepresented excuse once again.

    No chance this leads to her leaving, she is clearly unsackable to Roland and does not have enough class to do the honourable thing by resigning.
  • Airman Brown
    Airman Brown Posts: 15,772
    Swisdom said:

    Some people (not me) do know who the backers are and what the offer was for. And it was not just "a bit of sponsorship" or "naming rights of a stand"

    Varney apart, name one.
  • Swisdom
    Swisdom Posts: 14,977

    Swisdom said:

    Some people (not me) do know who the backers are and what the offer was for. And it was not just "a bit of sponsorship" or "naming rights of a stand"

    Varney apart, name one.
    Wouldn't achieve anything and I wouldn't betray their trust. I'm sure you understand.

  • Airman Brown
    Airman Brown Posts: 15,772
    edited June 2016
    Swisdom said:

    Swisdom said:

    Some people (not me) do know who the backers are and what the offer was for. And it was not just "a bit of sponsorship" or "naming rights of a stand"

    Varney apart, name one.
    Wouldn't achieve anything and I wouldn't betray their trust. I'm sure you understand.

    It's a bit meaningless then, isn't it? You haven't even located these people in or around the club. So they are people who can't be identified who know something that they haven't told you.

    Are you claiming that Meire knows or is likely to know from them?
  • sm
    sm Posts: 2,960
    Don't need emails - I know whose word I trust. She should be asked to apologise and left to deal with her own conscience.
  • sadiejane1981
    sadiejane1981 Posts: 9,012
    Retract, would be good to see that squirm.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Redmidland
    Redmidland Posts: 44,700
    We have a strange situation here, if PV publishes the emails, he may be compromising his backer(s), and would need permission I guess to release some of the documents. If Meire retracts, then the potential talks could continue (if they ever started) and we may get a positive outcome. However even if she retracts, RD will not hang her out to dry, he hasn't before and i don't see it being different this time, but he could pull out of said talks if PV publishes. Its a case now of 'cat and mouse' and both parties may have to back down. This is of course assuming any talks have taken place of which I'm not in the know. The next 36 hours now will be very interesting to watch.
  • Swisdom
    Swisdom Posts: 14,977

    Swisdom said:

    Swisdom said:

    Some people (not me) do know who the backers are and what the offer was for. And it was not just "a bit of sponsorship" or "naming rights of a stand"

    Varney apart, name one.
    Wouldn't achieve anything and I wouldn't betray their trust. I'm sure you understand.

    It's a bit meaningless then, isn't it? You haven't even located these people in or around the club. So they are people who can't be identified who know something that they haven't told you.

    Are you claiming that Meire knows or is likely to know from them?
    All I said is that some people do. Two different people have told me the same thing and neither were Katrien. I dare say she is aware though.

    I'm not playing the "I know something you don't" game but your statement said "nobody knows"

  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,509
    Swisdom said:

    Swisdom said:

    Swisdom said:

    Some people (not me) do know who the backers are and what the offer was for. And it was not just "a bit of sponsorship" or "naming rights of a stand"

    Varney apart, name one.
    Wouldn't achieve anything and I wouldn't betray their trust. I'm sure you understand.

    It's a bit meaningless then, isn't it? You haven't even located these people in or around the club. So they are people who can't be identified who know something that they haven't told you.

    Are you claiming that Meire knows or is likely to know from them?
    All I said is that some people do. Two different people have told me the same thing and neither were Katrien. I dare say she is aware though.

    I'm not playing the "I know something you don't" game but your statement said "nobody knows"

    You are ...unless you tell us who. ;-)

    Two different people??
    Sounds almost common knowledge then.
  • Swisdom
    Swisdom Posts: 14,977
    Two different people but I don't know if they are friends or business associates in the real world.

    It matters not though. What's important is it is feasible that there is an offer on the table and we might find out a bit more in a few days.

    It really is exciting being a Charlton fan isn't it.
  • Nearly everything in life is for sale at the right price, maybe RD has had preliminary discussions with Varney's people but this doesn't mean the club is for sale, merely that he is investigating what's on the table.
    I don't understand why you are all getting so excited over this other than the fact that KM has yet again landed her self in hot water.
  • ricky_otto
    ricky_otto Posts: 22,600
    Emails - we all know that whatever she says is total bollocks, so no point in her retracting anything she says,
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,367
    Retract? Bollocks! I want her to repeat it. And publish it. And stick it on YouTube.
  • StigThundercock
    StigThundercock Posts: 3,722
    option c) KM to just go away
  • carly burn
    carly burn Posts: 19,509
    Seeing as she's never done anything wrong in her life ever...Get the emails ready Pete
  • LenGlover
    LenGlover Posts: 31,683
    It was Andy Murray talking about leaving his Volley but the Scottish accent made it sound like Valley.

    Sorry Katrien all is forgiven!