Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

More Banning Orders issued by the Regime

«13

Comments

  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,375
    Does it seem strange that these people have not been named?
  • No doesn't seem strange. Pleased that firm action is being taken. Although....very hard to enforce.
  • I would imagine that the club will look for ways to extend banning orders to any overt form of protest whenever they can.

    It will be a war this year. How the fuck has it come to this.
  • kafka
    kafka Posts: 2,373
    We have anti social owners. What do they expect?
  • kentred2
    kentred2 Posts: 2,346
    Once the scum have sold up there should be an honours board for all those who had banning orders or had been arrested for protesting.
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,375

    No doesn't seem strange. Pleased that firm action is being taken. Although....very hard to enforce.

    Especially if they're not named.

    "...so that's about it for the pre-match security announcement, team. Just don't forget that there are four people banned from entering the ground. So, if you see them, don't let them in".

    "OK. But who are they?"

    "Can't tell you, sorry".
  • Chizz said:

    Does it seem strange that these people have not been named?

    Happy they have not been named.

    I was at Welling (There's a thread about the incidents).

    If it's the people on the pitch then that's really silly. If it's for smoke bombs then it is deserved.
  • Addickted
    Addickted Posts: 19,456
    So two people banned following pitch invasion at the Burnley game.

    Would that'll be Ivor Whippet and Norman Flatcap?
  • All_Thaid_Up
    All_Thaid_Up Posts: 2,293
    I call bollocks on this! I think its a threat for the future.

  • Sponsored links:



  • Valiantphil
    Valiantphil Posts: 6,416
    Can just see the bloke on the Bury turnstile checking everyone's name as they go in.
  • shirty5
    shirty5 Posts: 19,293
    The away safety officer's? Meire's Bodyguards?
  • Oh_Yoni_Boy
    Oh_Yoni_Boy Posts: 1,763
    Wasn't there, but from the Welling thread it sounds pretty justified. And if you pitch invade during a game at The Valley you know what you're getting.
  • palarsehater
    palarsehater Posts: 12,304
    edited August 2016
    a lot on here were moaning about there behaviour... so no surpise they got banned.
  • WSS
    WSS Posts: 25,091
    3 years for going on the pitch at Welling? Seriously?
  • Isawsummersplay
    Isawsummersplay Posts: 1,430
    edited August 2016
    Whilst I don't condone the actions of those banned, I can fully understand how the frustrations caused by Meire, Duchatelet and Murray have acted as a catalyst to their pitch incursions. And I suspect that by the time this poisonous trio have quit the Club, the number of banning orders issued will have risen substantially. Whether all are justified is another matter.

    As someone who evaded a police cordon to 'invade' the vacant East Terrace before kick-off the day we played Stoke City in September 1985 (our last game at The Valley before decamping to Selhurst Park), and who then went on the pitch at half time and full time, I can empathise with those banned.

    I believe that those responsible for the Club quitting The Valley back then, however misguided they may have been, did so with the Club's best interests at heart. The same cannot be said of the current incumbents who seem to take pleasure in deliberately antagonising the ever-diminishing ranks of Charlton fans at every turn.

    History tells us that their time in charge of CAFC will come to an end - this is inevitable. It is just a question of when. As a fan whose support of the Addicks spans seven decades, I hope it is sooner rather than later, and before the frustrations these idiots have caused me to endure, result in my repeating those actions of 1985.

    Still, I might end up in the Guiness Book of Records as the oldest football supporter to receive a Banning Order!

  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 21,418
    WSS said:

    3 years for going on the pitch at Welling? Seriously?

    Why should it matter if it's Welling or Wembley? Going on the pitch is an offence that has a banning order as a punishment, no ifs, no buts.
  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 21,418
    WSS said:

    3 years for going on the pitch at Welling? Seriously?

    Why should it matter if it's Welling or Wembley? Going on the pitch is an offence that has a banning order as a punishment, no ifs, no buts.
  • ElfsborgAddick
    ElfsborgAddick Posts: 29,264
    I reckon this was all instigated by altrinchamaddick.
  • Spanish
    Spanish Posts: 856

    Can just see the bloke on the Bury turnstile checking everyone's name as they go in.

    Has anyone seen Bryan of Nazareth ?

  • Sponsored links:



  • BUY SOME PLAYERS FFS
  • DaveMehmet
    DaveMehmet Posts: 21,646
    Can the club enforce bans on fans attending away games?
  • SDAddick
    SDAddick Posts: 14,490
    Is it possible they weren't named because they're minors? That's common practice here, you cannot name minors in any sort of press incident. From what I remember hearing, it sounded like those up to mischief at Welling were of the yoot variety.
  • Spanish
    Spanish Posts: 856

    BUY SOME PLAYERS FFS

    Some might almost be encouraged to come on the pitch if we don't sign any players this week!!

    The club has become a joke and as stated above, these actions might well be to continue to antagonise the fans. Why they would even want to remain in place, under such intense hatred is difficult to understand, especially given the interest to buy the club from at least 2 alleged sources.

    Please sell up.
  • ricky_otto
    ricky_otto Posts: 22,600
    WSS said:

    3 years for going on the pitch at Welling? Seriously?

    Hopefully Johnson will be issued the same.
  • 3 years, lucky fuckers.
  • LordDofB
    LordDofB Posts: 205
    Just means ever lower attendances.
  • J BLOCK
    J BLOCK Posts: 8,333

    No doesn't seem strange. Pleased that firm action is being taken. Although....very hard to enforce.

    You're a joke
  • Swisdom
    Swisdom Posts: 14,977
    Probably can't name them because of their age.
  • SDAddick
    SDAddick Posts: 14,490
    Swisdom said:

    Probably can't name them because of their age.

    That viewpoint was SO 11 minutes ago ;)