Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Substitutes.

Before Da Silva today:
When was the last time we substituted a substitute for non-injury reasons?

Comments

  • Lincsaddick
    Lincsaddick Posts: 32,475
    no idea .. but today's was a crackers decision .. he looked skilful and lively .. Robinson's not going to improve his confidence much by doing this .. UNLESS he was actually injured
  • no idea .. but today's was a crackers decision .. he looked skilful and lively .. Robinson's not going to improve his confidence much by doing this .. UNLESS he was actually injured

    He put some good crosses in, just no one at the near post.
  • Simonsen
    Simonsen Posts: 5,555

    no idea .. but today's was a crackers decision .. he looked skilful and lively .. Robinson's not going to improve his confidence much by doing this .. UNLESS he was actually injured

    We needed to get Holmes on. Da Silva played for about an hour and that's probably at least double what he could've expected under normal circumstances.
  • no idea .. but today's was a crackers decision .. he looked skilful and lively .. Robinson's not going to improve his confidence much by doing this .. UNLESS he was actually injured

    Because of the enforced need to make an early substitution he was brought on a lot sooner than he should have, in fact, so was TW in my view and they both ran out of steam towards the end but only one could come off. Give them a bit more chance to get match fit and they will both be starters, not on the bench.
  • cantersaddick
    cantersaddick Posts: 17,394
    Didn't it happen with sanogo last year. He had a strop or something....

    It's the kids first appearance in senior football, he isn't used to the pace or physicality. Karl was probably gonna use him for 30 max. He had 60 and so came off. Right decision in my view.

    However with a fit Holmes he wouldn't have come on at all!
  • Didn't Charlton Cole come on at half time, and was substituted before the final whistle when he was on loan?
  • Leuth
    Leuth Posts: 23,489
    Thought Byrne should have gone off for Holmes today
  • seth plum
    seth plum Posts: 53,448
    Leuth said:

    Thought Byrne should have gone off for Holmes today

    agree
  • sam3110
    sam3110 Posts: 21,583
    DaSilva was knackered, he's only played kiddy football so far, probably with a sponge ball
  • 25May98
    25May98 Posts: 712
    I hope Karl made it perfectly clear to Da Silva that the decision to take him off was not due to him playing badly. He did really well considering everything.

    He is so tiny. How old is he? Can he still grow?

  • Sponsored links:



  • Daggs
    Daggs Posts: 1,344
    Da silva looked like a fish out of water. He's not ready for League 1
  • JiMMy 85
    JiMMy 85 Posts: 10,213
    I'm pretty sure that neither Da Silva nor Tony Watt were fit enough to play more than 30 mins, and they were on the bench to get some match time later on in the game. We were really buggered by the two injuries we got, and it's nuts to call Robinson out for the subs we made.
  • LenGlover
    LenGlover Posts: 31,716

    no idea .. but today's was a crackers decision .. he looked skilful and lively .. Robinson's not going to improve his confidence much by doing this .. UNLESS he was actually injured

    Who else would you have taken off to get Holmes on?
  • The_President
    The_President Posts: 14,280
    Lightweight, knocked off the ball easily,gave the ball away - how easily pleased some people are.
  • Weegie Addick
    Weegie Addick Posts: 16,669
    JiMMy 85 said:

    I'm pretty sure that neither Da Silva nor Tony Watt were fit enough to play more than 30 mins, and they were on the bench to get some match time later on in the game. We were really buggered by the two injuries we got, and it's nuts to call Robinson out for the subs we made.

    Yeah, nuts to call out the manager whose job it is to plan for such eventualities and to persuade the billionaire owner to invest properly in the squad.
  • Callumcafc
    Callumcafc Posts: 64,261

    JiMMy 85 said:

    I'm pretty sure that neither Da Silva nor Tony Watt were fit enough to play more than 30 mins, and they were on the bench to get some match time later on in the game. We were really buggered by the two injuries we got, and it's nuts to call Robinson out for the subs we made.

    Yeah, nuts to call out the manager whose job it is to plan for such eventualities and to persuade the billionaire owner to invest properly in the squad.
    Yeah but the owner's a penny pinching knobcheese.
  • Weegie Addick
    Weegie Addick Posts: 16,669

    JiMMy 85 said:

    I'm pretty sure that neither Da Silva nor Tony Watt were fit enough to play more than 30 mins, and they were on the bench to get some match time later on in the game. We were really buggered by the two injuries we got, and it's nuts to call Robinson out for the subs we made.

    Yeah, nuts to call out the manager whose job it is to plan for such eventualities and to persuade the billionaire owner to invest properly in the squad.
    Yeah but the owner's a penny pinching knobcheese.
    Quite agree. Maybe the mercenary manager should have worked that out too.
  • se9addick
    se9addick Posts: 32,188
    Da Silva has never kicked a ball at first team level before, he has raw talent but I highly doubt he's going to do much productive with it in the next couple of months-but he'll get some first team experience that benefits him & Chelsea.
  • Chizz
    Chizz Posts: 28,451

    Didn't Charlton Cole come on at half time, and was substituted before the final whistle when he was on loan?

    Yes. And I'm pretty sure he scored the winner that game too.
  • Chizz said:

    Didn't Charlton Cole come on at half time, and was substituted before the final whistle when he was on loan?

    Yes. And I'm pretty sure he scored the winner that game too.
    Think he scored the winner against us, when we were two up and had Paul Konchesky sent off against Chelsea in the first game of the season, many years ago.