Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Players Marks: Northampton v Charlton
lancashire lad
Posts: 15,713
Your marks 0.5 to 10 please
Rudd:
Byrne:
Page:
Konsa:
Bauer:
Holmes:
Crofts:
Ulverstad:
Botaka:
Magennis:
Novak:
Teixeira:
Chicksen n/a
Watt n/a
Rudd:
Byrne:
Page:
Konsa:
Bauer:
Holmes:
Crofts:
Ulverstad:
Botaka:
Magennis:
Novak:
Teixeira:
Chicksen n/a
Watt n/a
0
Comments
-
Rudd: 6
Byrne: 4
Page: 3
Konsa: 5
Bauer: 4
Holmes: 5
Crofts: 4.5
Ulverstad: 4
Botaka: 5.5
Magennis: 4.5
Teixeira: 5
Novak: 2.5
Teixeira: 5
Shit3 -
Your marks 0.5 to 10 please
Rudd: 5
Byrne: 3
Page: 3
konsa 3
Bauer: 3
Holmes: 3
Crofts: 3
Ulvsted 3
Botaka 2
Maginess 2
Novak: 2
Tex 2
Chicksen n/a
Watt n/a
Watt. Waste of space wanker of a player.
Robinson 0 please fuckoff you scummy scouse wanker4 -
Lol dunno why I did two texes. We are so shit at football btwateamofcorygibbs said:Rudd: 6
Byrne: 4
Page: 3
Konsa: 5
Bauer: 4
Holmes: 5
Crofts: 4.5
Ulverstad: 4
Botaka: 5.5
Magennis: 4.5
Teixeira: 5
Novak: 2.5
Teixeira: 5
Shit0 -
Rudd 5
Byrne 5
Page 4
Konsa 5
Bauer 4
Holmes 4
CTOFTS 4
Ulvestad 4
Botaka 4
Magennis 4
Novak 4
Robinson fuck off1 -
Your marks 0.5 to 10 please
Rudd: 6
Byrne: 5
Page: 4
Konsa: 6
Bauer: 4
Holmes: 6
Crofts: 4
Ulverstad: 3
Botaka: 6
Magennis: 4
Novak: 4
Teixeira: 3
Chicksen n/a
Watt n/a1 -
Rudd: 6 He probably can't wait to get back up to Norwich
Byrne: 6 Thought he's been one of the better performers last few games
Page: 2 I always said we'd regret getting rid of Fox, a worse player now who doesn't care much
Konsa 3 Doesn't care, agent already touting him for the summer
Bauer: 3 Not sure whats happened to his form, now looks average in this league
Holmes: 4 Was off his game today
Crofts: 3 Awful
Ulvsted 2.5 Even more awful
Botaka: 4 inc one extra for the goal
Maginess 3 what on earth has happened to him
Novak: 4 Average
Tex: 2 At fault for 2nd goal,looks like Rocky running and doesn't give a hoot
Chicsken: Only on for 15 but man of the match, play him every week please
Watt: Should never be allowed near a Charlton shirt ever again
Club might as well release season ticket prices for next year now, as for one they'll be for league 2 as thats where we're heading, fast. Secondly no one, including me will buy one anyway,5 -
Rudd: 6
Byrne: 5
Page: 4
Konsa: 5
Bauer: 5.5
Holmes: 5
Crofts: 4
Ulverstad: 4
Botaka: 5
Magennis: 5
Novak: 5
Teixeira: 4
As others have said Watt can do one. came on for 10 minutes and if the ref hadn't been so lenient, his petulance could have got him sent off and that's not a straight red, that's 2 yellows in 10 minutes, unbelievable!0 -
Rudd: 3
Byrne: 5
Page: 2
Konsa: 3.5
Bauer: 5
Holmes: 5.5
Crofts: 4
Ulverstad: 4.5
Botaka: 6
Magennis: 3
Novak: 4
Teixeira: 40 -
Your marks 0.5 to 10 please
Rudd: 5
Byrne: 5
Page: 3
Konsa 4
Bauer: 4
Holmes: 5
Crofts: 5
Ulverstad: 5
Botaka: 6.5
Magennis: 4
Novak: 4
Teixeira: 4
Chicksen n/a
Watt n/a0 -
Rudd: 5.5 – Not at fault for either goal IMO
Byrne: 5.5 – First time I've seen him at RB and was pleasantly surprised during the first hour, though faded afterwards like most of his team-mates
Page: 3 – I'm still yet to see him play well
Konsa: 5.5 – Looked reasonably assured compared to both his CB partners, but that's not saying much
Bauer: 4.5 – Really hasn't looked the same player over the last 2-3 months
Holmes: 5 – Not really his day, and I'd like him to stay a bit wider (like Botaka does), especially when there are two up front, but always full of running and commitment can't be questioned
Crofts: 5 – Not great, but I'd still have him in the team given lack of alternatives
Ulvestad: 5 – Looked a little bit rusty, but I still prefer him to Forster-Caskey from what I've seen of the latter
Botaka: 6 – Is direct and a willing runner, one of the few often calling for the ball. Decision-making occasionally lets him down, but I'd continue to start him. Gets an extra half-point for another (admittedly scrappy) goal
Magennis: 4 – Hasn't looked the same player since the injury. Very poor in the second half.
Novak: 3 – I still don't really see what he offers (and no idea why he didn't play Ulvestad in early in the second half!)
Teixeira: 4 – Gave the ball away (as he has done so much recently!) for the second goal1 -
Sponsored links:
-
Rudd: 5
Byrne: 4
Page: 2
Konsa: 3
Bauer: 4
Holmes: 4.5
Crofts: 4
Ulvestad: 3
Botaka: 5
Magennis: 3
Novak: 2
Teixeira: 2
Chicksen n/a
Watt n/a (absolute waste of time. Deluded man whose ability does not match his ego or arrogance).0 -
Rudd: 6
Byrne: 5
Page: 4
Konsa: 5
Bauer: 2
Holmes: 6
Crofts: 5
Ulverstad: 5
Botaka: 7 mom. our only threat.
Magennis: 2
Novak: 3
Teixeira: 3
watt: 20 -
Rudd: 6
Byrne: 5.5 Extra marks out of sympathy as it's not his natural position
Page: 3
Konsa: 4
Bauer: 4
Holmes: 6 Not his best game but he tried
Crofts: 5
Ulverstad:5
Botaka: 6.5 Always a willing outlet
Magennis: 5
Novak: 5
Teixeira: 4
Watt 2, lucky to not be sent off in his brief cameo0 -
Rudd: 6
Byrne: 6
Page: 3.5
Konsa: 3.5
Bauer: 4
Holmes: 6
Crofts: 4.5
Ulverstad: 3.5
Botaka: 6.5
Magennis: 3
Novak: 3.5
Teixeira: 30 -
Rudd: 6 - decent enough, although flapped at a cross second half
Byrne: 5 - he's not a full back, Solly's return can't come quick enough
Page: 4 - nothing to suggest he can sufficiently replace or even surpass fox
Konsa: 6 - looked OK in a poor defence
Bauer: 5 - seems to have lost it. Now looks a league one player on this Performance!
Holmes: 6 - plenty of effort but faded in the second half
Crofts: 4 - the central midfield partnership with ulvestad under slade returned, it still doesn't work
Ulverstad: 4 - see crofts comment, although probably rusty following his recent absence
Botaka: 6 - he saw a lot of the ball in second half, but largely uneffective. One extra point for the goal.
Magennis: 4 - I expected better from him
Novak: 3 - tried to make a run from halfway line in second half but ran into no man's land and gave it away easily. Competing with watt to be the fattest forward at charlton
Teixeira: 4 - meant to be our best centre half but bloody awful today. Gave the ball away cheaply on several occasions including their second goal.
Chicksen n/a shame the mark doesn't apply to him. He should have played instead of page
Watt n/a - good job the mark doesn't apply to him, never looked like he could change things to pull it back3 -
Rudd: 6
Byrne: 5
Page: 3
Konsa: 6.5
Bauer: 4.5
Holmes: 5.5
Crofts: 5
Ulverstad: 4.5
Botaka: 6.5
Magennis: 6
Novak: 5
Teixeira: 4
Chicksen n/a
Watt n/a0 -
very generous marks being given0
-
Rudd: 6 - no real chance with either goal.The problems are in front of him.
Byrne: 5 - did ok, given he's playing out of position.
Page: 4 - better than his last game but still a weak link. His positional sense is poor, as is his use of the ball. Chicksen will hopefully return on Tuesday.
Konsa: 6 - did alright in an otherwise shaky defence.
Bauer: 4 - bullied by Michael Smith from the off. His form has gone down the tubes,
Holmes: 5.5 - tried very hard but nothing came off for him on the day.
Crofts: 4 - tries hard but is just not up to it.
Ulverstad: 4 - really weak.
Botaka: 6 - blows hot and cold but at least offered something offensively.
Magennis: 3 - bloody awful. Looked as if he had lead in his boots.
Novak: 3 - see Magennis.
Teixeira: 4 - see Bauer.
0 -
Rudd: 6 Couldn't of done anything for either of their goals. A decent keeper just got a load of rubbish in front of him
Byrne: 6 An OK performance, all their joy came down Page's flank
Page: 2 Thought he was rubbish.
Konsa: 5 OK. One decent run towards the centre circle. Got bullied by Smith though
Bauer: 3 Did not win a single header - his regression increasingly notcibable
Holmes: 6.5 Only exciting player we have, not afraid to run at the oppo
Crofts: 5 Static very sidewasey
Ulverstad: 4.5 not great
Botaka: 6 I don't really think he knows what he is doing most of the time but put in a few good balls, and managed to find the net
Magennis: 2.5 So so bad, what happened to the old him?
Novak: 2.5 See Magennis, but he was never good
Teixeira: 4 Like the other defenders was bullied by Smith0 -
Rudd: 6
Byrne: 6
Page: 4
Konsa: 6
Bauer: 4
Holmes: 7 - MOM (not saying much though and faded in the second half)
Crofts: 5
Ulverstad: 4
Botaka: 6 (+1 for the goal)
Magennis: 4 (clearly not fit)
Novak: 3
Teixeira: 3
Chicksen n/a (looked positive when he came on)
Watt n/a (with each additional game played for Charlton, he looks less likely to make a positive contribution...)0 -
Sponsored links:
-
Rudd: 6.5
Byrne: 4
Page: 4.5
Konsa: 6.5
Bauer: 4
Holmes: 6
Crofts: 5
Ulverstad: 5.5
Botaka: 6
Magennis: 4.5
Novak: 4
Teixeira: 40 -
Rudd: 6, his Kicking was poor but pulled off one good save.
Byrne:5 light wait
Page: 4 just not goodenough
Konsa: 6
Bauer:4, but must have been still suffering from the blow to the head from last week
Holmes: 7 best player on the pitch.
Crofts: 5 did very little
Ulverstad: 5 not into the game
Botaka:6 second best Charlton player
Magennis: 5 was out matched, won very few headers.
Novak: 5 did his best.
Teixeir 4poor.0
