The 2017 Summer Transfer Rumours Thread (Deadline Day from page 264)
Comments
-
Off to Southend for £150kLaddick01 said:4 hours ago Holmes liked a tweet about playing Southend away at Christmas.
I'm going to take that as him committing his future to the club
"We felt the offer was a fair one for a player with only one year left on his contract" commented Katrien0 -
Damn him for utilising his contacts during his time at MK.The Red Robin said:
Ah of course, another Milton Keynes connection.Scoham said:5 -
Holmes will NOT stay0
-
His technical ability should not be in question. Has a great left peg on him.killerandflash said:
Well he scored in the last 2 matches, and contributed a couple of assists around that period too.seth plum said:
JFC is still on my 'unsure' list.killerandflash said:
DaSilva clearly was a major factor, but it was also noticeable that JFC was starting to settle down and really make a contribution to camesSwisdom said:
At the point of his return WE were one of the poorest teams.JamesSeed said:
That, and the fact that we largely faced the poorest teams in the last 5 matches.Swisdom said:I must admit I am delighted with Pearce signing a new contract. I hold my hands up and state I didn't think he was all that good however Our performances turned around dramatically towards the end of the season and this was largely attributable to a solid defence marshalled by him.
So far so good
Hoping Da Silva is coming back for the season. Think he is going to be a superstar but A season with us and hopefully getting promoted with us what to do both parties very good.
For the last 6 games KR has said he was happy we were playing more like he wanted us to. The stats for distances covered, passing, dribbles etc were all a vastly improved.
It's not all down to Pearce but he definitely marshals that defence better than Tex and/or Bauer.
Usually I have a settled idea about a player after about 6 games, but for some reason not JFC.
There are occasional flashes of excellence, there is a sometimes moody player without focus, there is sometimes an isolated person, there is sometimes a player who makes good runs and links with others, there is a player capable of a goal or two, but also one who can make poor decisions.
I really struggle to understand what he is about, do others 'get' him yet?
The injury affected his progress, as it happened just when he was trying to settle at a new club. I think there's a good midfield playmaker there, but one that needs good coaching to bring the best out. Lee Bowyer should be able to help! He has 12 England U21 caps, you don't get that many unless you have some ability.
As Robinson alluded to after the Bolton game it's about consistency with him. He should be running things in midfield in this division. And to be fair, toward the end of the season he had some very good games.
It seemed that he came to us not particularly match fit, and then got injured. It was noticeable that when he came back from injury and had a run of 4-5 games in the side is when he really started to shine.
With a full pre-season behind him, I expect big things, especially if we have Kashi and/or Konsa in midfield alongside him. I'm also hoping we keep Magennis and Holmes, meaning we'd have a better attacking quartet than the end of last season, giving him more players to play with.3 -
Don't think he'll go. He's played some of his best football here, is settled, and would probably be thinking of a promotion push (for which he'll be on a decent bonus).DamoNorthStand said:I think we all know he will end up going. It is to who and when (I expect it to be pretty late in the day).
Why would he turn down the chance to play in the Championship? And why would Roland turn down cash?1 -
I know this is sacrilege, but I'd like a more prolific striker than Magennis. It worries me that it took him so long to get his form back after injury. Looks good when he's at his very best though.9
-
Competition for Josh would be great.JamesSeed said:I know this is sacrilege, but I'd like a more prolific striker than Magennis. It worries me that it took him so long to get his form back after injury. Looks good when he's at his very best though.
But with the formation Robinson likes to play (and stick to rigidly), it's no use bringing in a poacher BWP type. Needs to be someone who can hold the ball up and bring the wingers into play. Hard to find someone who does that and score goals as well (...Yann) but we should definitely be looking.5 -
I have to agree with you there.JamesSeed said:I know this is sacrilege, but I'd like a more prolific striker than Magennis. It worries me that it took him so long to get his form back after injury. Looks good when he's at his very best though.
I think Magennis adds a lot to the team but I can only see him scoring 12 to q5 goals a season.
We badly need another striker who can at least match that total or indeed beat it if we are serious about promotion .0 - Sponsored links:
-
Isn't he from Southend? Maybe he's going to do a Danny Mills and get christmas off so he can come back from Sheffield.Laddick01 said:4 hours ago Holmes liked a tweet about playing Southend away at Christmas.
I'm going to take that as him committing his future to the club0 -
In our formation we need the 3 attacking midfielders to weigh in with a decent number of goals as wellblackpool72 said:
I have to agree with you there.JamesSeed said:I know this is sacrilege, but I'd like a more prolific striker than Magennis. It worries me that it took him so long to get his form back after injury. Looks good when he's at his very best though.
I think Magennis adds a lot to the team but I can only see him scoring 12 to q5 goals a season.
We badly need another striker who can at least match that total or indeed beat it if we are serious about promotion .4 -
I believe Southend is the other team interested in him besides Sheff Utd, so perhaps he is looking forward to playing against Charlton at ChristmasLaddick01 said:4 hours ago Holmes liked a tweet about playing Southend away at Christmas.
I'm going to take that as him committing his future to the club0 -
If we sell Holmes to Southend then I really will give up.ross1 said:
I believe Southend is the other team interested in him besides Sheff Utd, so perhaps he is looking forward to playing against Charlton at ChristmasLaddick01 said:4 hours ago Holmes liked a tweet about playing Southend away at Christmas.
I'm going to take that as him committing his future to the club
8 -
If any player would rather play for Southend over Charlton then we really are a train wreck aren't we?ross1 said:
I believe Southend is the other team interested in him besides Sheff Utd, so perhaps he is looking forward to playing against Charlton at ChristmasLaddick01 said:4 hours ago Holmes liked a tweet about playing Southend away at Christmas.
I'm going to take that as him committing his future to the club
0 -
The sad thing is we cannot completely rule it out.:(Rossman92 said:
If any player would rather play for Southend over Charlton then we really are a train wreck aren't we?ross1 said:
I believe Southend is the other team interested in him besides Sheff Utd, so perhaps he is looking forward to playing against Charlton at ChristmasLaddick01 said:4 hours ago Holmes liked a tweet about playing Southend away at Christmas.
I'm going to take that as him committing his future to the club0 -
What, that team that finished above us?Rossman92 said:
If any player would rather play for Southend over Charlton then we really are a train wreck aren't we?ross1 said:
I believe Southend is the other team interested in him besides Sheff Utd, so perhaps he is looking forward to playing against Charlton at ChristmasLaddick01 said:4 hours ago Holmes liked a tweet about playing Southend away at Christmas.
I'm going to take that as him committing his future to the club0 -
I think he may have scored more but for the injury. It may have been the injury but the worrying thing for me was that he looked slightly disinterested after he came back last season. I could be interpreting it wrong, but he just seemed a little nonchalantblackpool72 said:
I have to agree with you there.JamesSeed said:I know this is sacrilege, but I'd like a more prolific striker than Magennis. It worries me that it took him so long to get his form back after injury. Looks good when he's at his very best though.
I think Magennis adds a lot to the team but I can only see him scoring 12 to q5 goals a season.
We badly need another striker who can at least match that total or indeed beat it if we are serious about promotion .1 -
I am crushed that we did not get Liam Lindsay. I guess it is hard to pass up The Championship.
But how could we lose Ball to Rotherham? Rotherham was so bad last year they will be lucky to survive in L1 this season. We should have been able to get him. Easily.
And McLaughlin? He would be great at right back.
Frustrated!9 -
Imagine being crushed not to get Lindsay hahaNapaAddick said:I am crushed that we did not get Liam Lindsay. I guess it is hard to pass up The Championship.
But how could we lose Ball to Rotherham? Rotherham was so bad last year they will be lucky to survive in L1 this season. We should have been able to get him. Easily.
And McLaughlin? He would be great at right back.
Frustrated!8 - Sponsored links:
-
Lazy daisy doing the negotiations.NapaAddick said:I am crushed that we did not get Liam Lindsay. I guess it is hard to pass up The Championship.
But how could we lose Ball to Rotherham? Rotherham was so bad last year they will be lucky to survive in L1 this season. We should have been able to get him. Easily.
And McLaughlin? He would be great at right back.
Frustrated!
Expect very little and you won't be too disappointed1 -
Were we ever interested in Ball or was it just some fans who thought he might be good? I don't remember seeing us ever linked with him?NapaAddick said:I am crushed that we did not get Liam Lindsay. I guess it is hard to pass up The Championship.
But how could we lose Ball to Rotherham? Rotherham was so bad last year they will be lucky to survive in L1 this season. We should have been able to get him. Easily.
And McLaughlin? He would be great at right back.
Frustrated!3 -
Perhaps we never wanted him. Or perhaps he wanted to stay up north...NapaAddick said:I am crushed that we did not get Liam Lindsay. I guess it is hard to pass up The Championship.
But how could we lose Ball to Rotherham? Rotherham was so bad last year they will be lucky to survive in L1 this season. We should have been able to get him. Easily.
And McLaughlin? He would be great at right back.
Frustrated!
0 -
As far as I know, we have not pursued Ball.
It's Reeves we have gone after. I doubt we get him either.
But Ball is quality, good for 10-14 goals easily every year, and I feel he was "gettable."
As a newer fan I think I look at it as... why not have Ball, Reeves and Holmes? That would be insane. And not even that expensive. Three midfielders all scoring 10-14. Heck, add in Ajose as a true striker and we have 40-60 goals between the 4 players. Sounds awesome.
And we have two of them already and the other two players are "free" transfers. What's so hard about that?
So I guess I keep wondering why our owners don't have more ambition?
Deep down I know the answer to that question but I keep hoping I am wrong. More and more I am seeing the reality and it frustrates me.
Not sure how you have all dealt with this for 3 years.6 -
Why can't you have all 3? Because how the feck would you fit them into the same team, and keep them all happy.NapaAddick said:As far as I know, we have not pursued Ball.
It's Reeves we have gone after. I doubt we get him either.
But Ball is quality, good for 10-14 goals easily every year, and I feel he was "gettable."
As a newer fan I think I look at it as... why not have Ball, Reeves and Holmes? That would be insane. And not even that expensive. Three midfielders all scoring 10-14. Sounds awesome. And we have one already and the other two players are "free" transfers. What's so hard about that?
So I guess I keep wondering why our owners don't have more ambition?
Deep down I know the answer to that question but I keep hoping I am wrong. More and more I am seeing the reality and it frustrates me.
Not sure how you have all dealt with this for 3 years.
And just because they've scored a dozen goals in one season, doesn't mean that's what happen every season, look at Ajose for instance.
Football isn't as simple as that6 -
I think as a new fan you have a lot to learn. It isn't FIFA or football manager where you have a look at some decent players and take as you please. Out of all the players you've talked about throughout the thread I think we've actually been linked with 2 or 3 of them. There's such thing as being not interested, if we were you would've heard about it.NapaAddick said:As far as I know, we have not pursued Ball.
It's Reeves we have gone after. I doubt we get him either.
But Ball is quality, good for 10-14 goals easily every year, and I feel he was "gettable."
As a newer fan I think I look at it as... why not have Ball, Reeves and Holmes? That would be insane. And not even that expensive. Three midfielders all scoring 10-14. Heck, add in Ajose as a true striker and we have 40-60 goals between the 4 players. Sounds awesome.
And we have two of them already and the other two players are "free" transfers. What's so hard about that?
So I guess I keep wondering why our owners don't have more ambition?
Deep down I know the answer to that question but I keep hoping I am wrong. More and more I am seeing the reality and it frustrates me.
Not sure how you have all dealt with this for 3 years.2 -
Are you saying that we can't have three good players in the middle because they all want to be the center of attention? That they will be upset that they are flanked by other good players? That seems an odd statement. Don't understand.sam3110 said:
Why can't you have all 3? Because how the feck would you fit them into the same team, and keep them all happy.NapaAddick said:As far as I know, we have not pursued Ball.
It's Reeves we have gone after. I doubt we get him either.
But Ball is quality, good for 10-14 goals easily every year, and I feel he was "gettable."
As a newer fan I think I look at it as... why not have Ball, Reeves and Holmes? That would be insane. And not even that expensive. Three midfielders all scoring 10-14. Sounds awesome. And we have one already and the other two players are "free" transfers. What's so hard about that?
So I guess I keep wondering why our owners don't have more ambition?
Deep down I know the answer to that question but I keep hoping I am wrong. More and more I am seeing the reality and it frustrates me.
Not sure how you have all dealt with this for 3 years.
And just because they've scored a dozen goals in one season, doesn't mean that's what happen every season, look at Ajose for instance.
Football isn't as simple as that
Is the alternative to make sure we only have one good player in each part of the field so they are "happy?" I don't see that problem at Real Madrid or any other successful club.
0 -
You can't hve 3 good players in the middle because thats not a formation you can play.NapaAddick said:
Are you saying that we can't have three good players in the middle because they all want to be the center of attention? That they will be upset that they are flanked by other good players? That seems an odd statement. Don't understand.sam3110 said:
Why can't you have all 3? Because how the feck would you fit them into the same team, and keep them all happy.NapaAddick said:As far as I know, we have not pursued Ball.
It's Reeves we have gone after. I doubt we get him either.
But Ball is quality, good for 10-14 goals easily every year, and I feel he was "gettable."
As a newer fan I think I look at it as... why not have Ball, Reeves and Holmes? That would be insane. And not even that expensive. Three midfielders all scoring 10-14. Sounds awesome. And we have one already and the other two players are "free" transfers. What's so hard about that?
So I guess I keep wondering why our owners don't have more ambition?
Deep down I know the answer to that question but I keep hoping I am wrong. More and more I am seeing the reality and it frustrates me.
Not sure how you have all dealt with this for 3 years.
And just because they've scored a dozen goals in one season, doesn't mean that's what happen every season, look at Ajose for instance.
Football isn't as simple as that
Is the alternative to make sure we only have one good player in each part of the field so they are "happy?" I don't see that problem at Real Madrid or any other successful club.
And they won't sign for us just to sit on the bench, when they can sign elsewhere and play week in week out0 -
At Real they tend to be on £50k+ a week... I reckon that's a factor. Just line someone leaving a lower league club to sit on a higher bench. It's down to the money, difference is in our situation you can't afford to pay top wages for already covered positions and need to priorities who you want to sign. Which KR would've done, he will be looking a lot deeper than player stats as you probably have though.NapaAddick said:
Are you saying that we can't have three good players in the middle because they all want to be the center of attention? That they will be upset that they are flanked by other good players? That seems an odd statement. Don't understand.sam3110 said:
Why can't you have all 3? Because how the feck would you fit them into the same team, and keep them all happy.NapaAddick said:As far as I know, we have not pursued Ball.
It's Reeves we have gone after. I doubt we get him either.
But Ball is quality, good for 10-14 goals easily every year, and I feel he was "gettable."
As a newer fan I think I look at it as... why not have Ball, Reeves and Holmes? That would be insane. And not even that expensive. Three midfielders all scoring 10-14. Sounds awesome. And we have one already and the other two players are "free" transfers. What's so hard about that?
So I guess I keep wondering why our owners don't have more ambition?
Deep down I know the answer to that question but I keep hoping I am wrong. More and more I am seeing the reality and it frustrates me.
Not sure how you have all dealt with this for 3 years.
And just because they've scored a dozen goals in one season, doesn't mean that's what happen every season, look at Ajose for instance.
Football isn't as simple as that
Is the alternative to make sure we only have one good player in each part of the field so they are "happy?" I don't see that problem at Real Madrid or any other successful club.0 -
dont let that stop people moaning that we didn't sign him before Rotherham did.NapaAddick said:As far as I know, we have not pursued Ball.
It's Reeves we have gone after. I doubt we get him either.
But Ball is quality, good for 10-14 goals easily every year, and I feel he was "gettable."
As a newer fan I think I look at it as... why not have Ball, Reeves and Holmes? That would be insane. And not even that expensive. Three midfielders all scoring 10-14. Heck, add in Ajose as a true striker and we have 40-60 goals between the 4 players. Sounds awesome.
And we have two of them already and the other two players are "free" transfers. What's so hard about that?
So I guess I keep wondering why our owners don't have more ambition?
Deep down I know the answer to that question but I keep hoping I am wrong. More and more I am seeing the reality and it frustrates me.
Not sure how you have all dealt with this for 3 years.4