Interview with Johnnie Jackson
Comments
-
It’s a clear correlation, but that doesn’t prove cause and effect. However, it’s in an interesting hypothesis.Henry Irving said:
That's a ridiculous level of proof.Exiled_Addick said:It's an opinion, not proof. Proof would be to play the same games twice, once with a protest and once without and see if the results and performances are different in one vs the other, but you'd need to play a lot of games to average out other variables that can affect a result.
We'll never know either way if the protest help, hinder or have neutral effect on results, but either the bigger picture of getting Roland out out weighs any short term impact on the league table.
The clear evidence given again and again and again by the players in public and private is that it doesn't impact on their performance. Nick Pope even told me and Fanny that if anything it helped as we're ready for it and others sides werent.
Statistically results were better than the norm on protest days.
Proven beyond reasonable doubt IMHO1 -
You say that as if it's a bad thing. If you can't stand by your stupid comments, don't make them.paulie8290 said:
Wow really,Brendan_O_Connell said:
us???????paulie8290 said:Is Johnnie hinting for us to protest again.
http://forum.charltonlife.com/discussion/72084/why/p1
You are like someone who has brought something up someone said in the past.
It was 2 years ago alot has happened since then.
Also at the time people were talking about trying to get the game abandond and it annoyed me as i had spent £45 to watch a game not for it to be abandoned
You were also happy to call protestors idiots back then, yet now want to make out as if you were one of them.
Blackheathaddick had it spot on all that time ago, the light's are on, but.....3 -
So let's spin it around. Where is the correlation between the protests and adverse impact on performances as claimed by some?SomervilleAddick said:
It’s a clear correlation, but that doesn’t prove cause and effect. However, it’s in an interesting hypothesis.Henry Irving said:
That's a ridiculous level of proof.Exiled_Addick said:It's an opinion, not proof. Proof would be to play the same games twice, once with a protest and once without and see if the results and performances are different in one vs the other, but you'd need to play a lot of games to average out other variables that can affect a result.
We'll never know either way if the protest help, hinder or have neutral effect on results, but either the bigger picture of getting Roland out out weighs any short term impact on the league table.
The clear evidence given again and again and again by the players in public and private is that it doesn't impact on their performance. Nick Pope even told me and Fanny that if anything it helped as we're ready for it and others sides werent.
Statistically results were better than the norm on protest days.
Proven beyond reasonable doubt IMHO
Where is the evidence for that and how does that evidence stack up to that for the protests having no negative impact?1
