Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

directors meeting off

mascot88
mascot88 Posts: 9,678
edited October 2008 in General Charlton
http://www.kent-online.co.uk/kol08/article/default.asp?article_id=49726

Comments

  • mascot88
    mascot88 Posts: 9,678
    didnt like the last line either
  • LargeAddick
    LargeAddick Posts: 32,665
    as said on sticky thread at the top, shame but not exactly unexpected. As for the last line it does say 'reports' suggest so they don't know either.
  • cfgs
    cfgs Posts: 11,495
    The last line is just reporting that another reporter reported that an offer had been reportedly made, just good reporting in my book.
  • Czech_Addick
    Czech_Addick Posts: 997
    [cite]Posted By: mascot88[/cite]didnt like the last line either
    You worry too much!
  • mascot88
    mascot88 Posts: 9,678
    [quote][cite]Posted By: Czech_Addick[/cite][quote][cite]Posted By: mascot88[/cite]didnt like the last line either[/quote]
    You worry too much![/quote]

    I know... i think i need some of that good czech lager take the edge off.....
  • Oggy Red
    Oggy Red Posts: 44,962
    "Charlton directors have pulled out of tonight's meeting of the Bromley branch of the Supporters' Club on the advice of bankers Rothschild who are heavily involved in the club's proposed takeover by Dubai-based Zabeel Investments".

    Sounds like Zabeel are serious, despite what hacks in the dreary Grauniad may conjure up?
  • KillersBeard
    KillersBeard Posts: 985
    Isn't this a good sign?

    If it were all crap and smoke, why would Rothschild be asking our Directors not to attend a meeting where they would be asked questions on the matter?
  • SID
    SID Posts: 266
    I would have been most surprised if they'd attended. it's obvious what all the questions would have been about and it's always possible something said is misconstrude (sp) or not and reported in the press. Loose lips sink ships and all that!
  • DA9
    DA9 Posts: 11,095
    [cite]Posted By: SID[/cite]I would have been most surprised if they'd attended. it's obvious what all the questions would have been about and it's always possible something said is misconstrude (sp) or not and reported in the press. Loose lips sink ships and all that!

    Especially as it has been advertised on here as a free to attend meeting, and with no vetting on the door, any amount of journo's could be in there, far too risky IMO and the right decision has been made.

Categories

“Marketplace”