Kent CCC 2018
Comments
-
334-6 (Rouse out for 8)
Really hard to judge how many runs will be enough, as while Denly and Dickson got tons, most people failed0 -
If we set 500 and they get it they deserve it.killerandflash said:334-6 (Rouse out for 8)
Really hard to judge how many runs will be enough, as while Denly and Dickson got tons, most people failed
The lead is 410 as I type with 4 wickets in hand.
We need more with Trott and Bell up against us.
Tunbridge Wells is a small ground.0 -
Barker has been told by the umpires that he can't bowl any more due to running on the protected area. The new ball isn't old and he has taken 9 of their 16 wickets so, hopefully, we can take advantage of his absence.1
-
The trials of bowling left arm over.Addick Addict said:Barker has been told by the umpires that he can't bowl any more due to running on the protected area. The new ball isn't old and he has taken 9 of their 16 wickets so, hopefully, we can take advantage of his absence.
I used to have that problem sometimes when I played.1 -
Did they have the "protected are" in those days Len?LenGlover said:
The trials of bowling left arm over.Addick Addict said:Barker has been told by the umpires that he can't bowl any more due to running on the protected area. The new ball isn't old and he has taken 9 of their 16 wickets so, hopefully, we can take advantage of his absence.
I used to have that problem sometimes when I played.1 -
Wasn't called that then but amounted to much the same thing. The area 4 feet (from memory) from off stump to a right hand bat.Addick Addict said:
Did they have the "protected are" in those days Len?LenGlover said:
The trials of bowling left arm over.Addick Addict said:Barker has been told by the umpires that he can't bowl any more due to running on the protected area. The new ball isn't old and he has taken 9 of their 16 wickets so, hopefully, we can take advantage of his absence.
I used to have that problem sometimes when I played.
I think I've been 'whooshed!'
Underarm when I played. Me and Darren's 8 x great grandfather 'Lumpy' Stevens.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lumpy_Stevens0 -
357-6 at the close. Crawley 47* the lead 429
EDIT: Score corrected to 359-6 so the lead is 4310 -
359-6 at close and a healthy lead of 431. Another 50 or so would be good.
An overcast day tomorrow would be also nice but, somehow, I don't think that's going to happen.0 -
Obviously we still have 2 days to go, but Kent will be wary of not running out of time as they did against Gloucs in a game they dominated0
-
Good point.killerandflash said:Obviously we still have 2 days to go, but Kent will be wary of not running out of time as they did against Gloucs in a game they dominated
I think they will be either bowled out before lunch or else achieve a lead of 500 by lunch and declare.
That will give them a minimum of 5 sessions. In reality they will probably have more than that.
Kent scored 355 runs today. All of a sudden 400 odd doesn't look that big to chase over 2 days which is why I keep saying we need more.1 - Sponsored links:
-
Apparently the second new ball was quite a testing period, so I imagine it's one of those games where the new ball is dangerous, but once it goes soft it becomes much easier to bat, especially once a batsman is set0
-
We will have two "bites of the cherry" though and possibly one on each morning when the bowlers are fresh too.killerandflash said:Apparently the second new ball was quite a testing period, so I imagine it's one of those games where the new ball is dangerous, but once it goes soft it becomes much easier to bat, especially once a batsman is set
0 -
I'll be down there to see Trott grind out 45no in 5 hours
But as I'll be in the CAMRA beer tent, I won't care
3 -
395-6 so a lead of 467 Crawley 67* his highest career score and hopefully counting4
-
Now on 84, steady progress this morning, everyone is waiting for Kent to bowl...LenGlover said:395-6 so a lead of 467 Crawley 67* his highest career score and hopefully counting
Podmore caught behind for 240 -
413-7 Crawley 85* lead 4850
-
Crawley goes for 93.
Kent 423-8, a lead of 4950 -
Crawley out for 92, he'd looked a bit loose before the dismissal0
-
Declaration at 446-85
-
Warwickshire require 519 to win.killerandflash said:Declaration at 446-8
3 - Sponsored links:
-
And that would be a record first class chase against us.LenGlover said:
Warwickshire require 519 to win.killerandflash said:Declaration at 446-8
0 -
Warwickshire 26-0 at lunch0
-
You'd expect Warks to do better second time round, it'll be interesting how the spinners get on as Patel looked quite dangerous this morning1
-
Typical that Crawley gets a big score after I'd called him out!
Good for him though, hope he kicks on.
Still no runs for Rouse though.0 -
I predict we lose...1
-
Early days still but Warwickshire chugging along nicely on 42-0 with Bell and Trott still to come amongst others.Addickted2TheReds said:I predict we lose...
0 -
44-1 Podmore.4
-
104-1
519 is a lot of runs but they'll have 250 plus by the close if they keep on the way they are.
We need wickets.1 -
Get a grip lads0
-
Addickted2TheReds said:
I predict we lose...
0
