RD hasn’t reached agreement with the former directors. If the Aussies insist on clean title, which I’m assured they are, the deal can’t be closed until he does.
RD hasn’t reached agreement with the former directors. If the Aussies insist on clean title, which I’m assured they are, the deal can’t be closed until he does.
RD hasn’t reached agreement with the former directors. If the Aussies insist on clean title, which I’m assured they are, the deal can’t be closed until he does.
RD hasn’t reached agreement with the former directors. If the Aussies insist on clean title, which I’m assured they are, the deal can’t be closed until he does.
Is the likely result of this that RD will extend the fire sale in order to make the up-front cash required to pay off the ex directors in full?
RD hasn’t reached agreement with the former directors. If the Aussies insist on clean title, which I’m assured they are, the deal can’t be closed until he does.
But i thought he was trying to pay off the directors so that he could lease the Valley & Sparrows Lane to the Aussies? So the Aussies want the friendly debt paid off prior to taking over?
RD hasn’t reached agreement with the former directors. If the Aussies insist on clean title, which I’m assured they are, the deal can’t be closed until he does.
Is this the only (substantive) thing holding it up at the moment do you know?
RD hasn’t reached agreement with the former directors. If the Aussies insist on clean title, which I’m assured they are, the deal can’t be closed until he does.
So is the deal with former directors, if made (and let's hope so if it's stopping completion), going to confirm the lease of ground and training ground scenario?
RD hasn’t reached agreement with the former directors. If the Aussies insist on clean title, which I’m assured they are, the deal can’t be closed until he does.
You’d think he’d clear this charge just to get this deal done. Nothing makes sense anymore
RD hasn’t reached agreement with the former directors. If the Aussies insist on clean title, which I’m assured they are, the deal can’t be closed until he does.
You’d think he’d clear this charge just to get this deal done. Nothing makes sense anymore
RD hasn’t reached agreement with the former directors. If the Aussies insist on clean title, which I’m assured they are, the deal can’t be closed until he does.
You’d think he’d clear this charge just to get this deal done. Nothing makes sense anymore
RD hasn’t reached agreement with the former directors. If the Aussies insist on clean title, which I’m assured they are, the deal can’t be closed until he does.
So is the deal with former directors, if made (and let's hope so if it's stopping completion), going to confirm the lease of ground and training ground scenario?
My understanding is that 1) it’s been RD pushing the lease scenario, which would require the loans to be cleared 2) the Aussies want the freehold and the loans cleared.
RD made a very low offer to clear the loans, which was rejected by at least three former directors.
None of this info comes from the Aussies, but make of it what you will.
Cos things like charges on the Club and loans to be settled are sorted on the supposed day of completion (take #5) and not while agreeing prices, doing Due Diligence etc. earlier on in the process.
RD hasn’t reached agreement with the former directors. If the Aussies insist on clean title, which I’m assured they are, the deal can’t be closed until he does.
Is this the only (substantive) thing holding it up at the moment do you know?
That, and the amount of time it's taking to remove derogatory reviews on Tripadvisor.
Comments
I've edited it out. @Henry Irving
VLADIMIR: That's what you think.
RD made a very low offer to clear the loans, which was rejected by at least three former directors.
None of this info comes from the Aussies, but make of it what you will.
This is NOTHING like buying a house
Think RD will now sell assets and cut as many costs as possible to try to achieve that £7 million.
Player sales with little expenditure and cut off the supply of bacon to the staff and only 13 chips per customer.
Think we might now be firmly in the shizer.