Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Options

The Takeover Thread - Duchatelet Finally Sells (Jan 2020)

1109610971099110111022262

Comments

  • so there you have it peeps-----RD dont fecking care as its always been a soco/experiment/toy for his ego----and the "buyers" dont really care as they drive the price down and sell at sometime whenever for a profit.


    and the lights go out
    and burger boy still has a job

    I doubt the belgian will lower the price, he'll just sit tight until someone gives him what he wants. We're fucked.
  • so there you have it peeps-----RD dont fecking care as its always been a soco/experiment/toy for his ego----and the "buyers" dont really care as they drive the price down and sell at sometime whenever for a profit.


    and the lights go out
    and burger boy still has a job

    I doubt the belgian will lower the price, he'll just sit tight until someone gives him what he wants. We're fucked.
    Weren't we told months ago that the price had been agree though?
  • David Smith please stop peddling this shit. There have been statements from both sides that the price has been agreed. If there is a 2nd bidder as RD alleges, they would have spent a lot money on DD so why are they silent and not out-bidding? From someone close to the club I'd expect some more informed posts.
  • so there you have it peeps-----RD dont fecking care as its always been a soco/experiment/toy for his ego----and the "buyers" dont really care as they drive the price down and sell at sometime whenever for a profit.


    and the lights go out
    and burger boy still has a job

    I doubt the belgian will lower the price, he'll just sit tight until someone gives him what he wants. We're fucked.
    Weren't we told months ago that the price had been agree though?
    I think it was. Multiple sources back that up. However some ITK posters have said that the price was agreed but the DD revealed the £7m hold over the assets that the previous directors hold and that RD didn't know about. Therefore the agreed price of (say) £35m that RD agreed effectively went up to £42m. I suspect the Aussies expected clean title to the club. We've heard RD made a derisory offer to the former directors to pay them off. Think there is now a wait until they resolve who swallows the £7m that was unaccounted for.
  • .

    Its certainly not based on nowt @JamesSeed

    As was always pointed out on here to me it’s easier for me say it’s not happening than it is for those saying it is however there have been dates mentioned by you and others around when it’s going to be a good week or it’s going to be done

    I said the deadline for decisions was weeks ago and I have kept my powder dry since but those days are passed long time who is to blame ultimately is RD

    The directors should be paid up in full or the status quo should be allowed to follow on

    If the Aussies were that keen on getting this done and for the reasons that they put our club is and our fans are special all words used by the Aussies
    If we were important and if we were the main reason then they would not leave us like this in the position we are in going in to the season

    That is all fact and it’s all that people like GH and others are suggesting

    We are either important enough to just get this done or it’s just about investment irrespective of the fans and this season because very soon this season is over

    Effectively you're saying that they have the option of paying off the directors' loans, and getting the deal done sooner than will be the case if RD settles up?

    Which is a fair argument, if it's the loans that are holding this up, rather than the mystery missing documents.

    Unfortunately I don't know which of the two is holding things up, or whether it's something else.
  • David Smith please stop peddling this shit. There have been statements from both sides that the price has been agreed. If there is a 2nd bidder as RD alleges, they would have spent a lot money on DD so why are they silent and not out-bidding? From someone close to the club I'd expect some more informed posts.

    unless i am not reading davids post correctly he hasnt said the fee hasnt been agreed , i think the suggestion DS is making is to why it may not have been concluded
  • Less then two weeks before kickoff and still owned by RD.
  • I dont believe theres missing documents even by pigeon post this would have arrived by now

    Its all bullshit and in the end is exploiting the good nature of charlton fans

    from all sides now

  • Sponsored links:


  • JamesSeed said:

    clb74 said:

    Both sides are taking the f@cking piss and can both do one

    Top idea. Let’s stick with Roland then.
    Let's say I've got it wrong then and the Aussies are offering half the 7 million surely there comes a point when the Aussies walk away.
    As I see the situation if Roland sells to the Aussies halfway through September I will be very surprised if we were to be in the mix come January, meaning the the Aussies have funded us for a season for nothing.
  • cafc-west said:

    so there you have it peeps-----RD dont fecking care as its always been a soco/experiment/toy for his ego----and the "buyers" dont really care as they drive the price down and sell at sometime whenever for a profit.


    and the lights go out
    and burger boy still has a job

    I doubt the belgian will lower the price, he'll just sit tight until someone gives him what he wants. We're fucked.
    Weren't we told months ago that the price had been agree though?
    I think it was. Multiple sources back that up. However some ITK posters have said that the price was agreed but the DD revealed the £7m hold over the assets that the previous directors hold and that RD didn't know about. Therefore the agreed price of (say) £35m that RD agreed effectively went up to £42m. I suspect the Aussies expected clean title to the club. We've heard RD made a derisory offer to the former directors to pay them off. Think there is now a wait until they resolve who swallows the £7m that was unaccounted for.
    That seems to be the story, but I find it really hard to believe that the directors issue wasn't known about when the original price was agreed. I assume that by that time a fair amount of due diligence would already have been done anyway
  • clb74 said:

    JamesSeed said:

    clb74 said:

    Both sides are taking the f@cking piss and can both do one

    Top idea. Let’s stick with Roland then.
    Let's say I've got it wrong then and the Aussies are offering half the 7 million surely there comes a point when the Aussies walk away.
    As I see the situation if Roland sells to the Aussies halfway through September I will be very surprised if we were to be in the mix come January, meaning the the Aussies have funded us for a season for nothing.
    would be nice if those buying us maybe approached those owed and asked what they may want instead of waiting for some old bstd who gives no shits about anything to do it
  • johnny73 said:

    JamesSeed said:

    Fumbluff said:

    image

    Blimey, someone went to the trouble of trawling through all my tweets to find this.

    And yes, I was wrong, and was only responding to a bunch of info that was sent to me over the space of a couple of days from a variety of sources. Not from the Aussies.

    I won't make that mistake again (he says hoping he hasn't done the same thing since then).
    James, you're an optimist and as long as it's clear that the comments are your hopes, and not what the Aussies have passed on, then I can't see a problem with you being positive. Need to keep a flame going even in the darkest days.
    Thanks. Shouldn’t have done the wink in that tweet though.
  • cafc-west said:

    so there you have it peeps-----RD dont fecking care as its always been a soco/experiment/toy for his ego----and the "buyers" dont really care as they drive the price down and sell at sometime whenever for a profit.


    and the lights go out
    and burger boy still has a job

    I doubt the belgian will lower the price, he'll just sit tight until someone gives him what he wants. We're fucked.
    Weren't we told months ago that the price had been agree though?
    I think it was. Multiple sources back that up. However some ITK posters have said that the price was agreed but the DD revealed the £7m hold over the assets that the previous directors hold and that RD didn't know about. Therefore the agreed price of (say) £35m that RD agreed effectively went up to £42m. I suspect the Aussies expected clean title to the club. We've heard RD made a derisory offer to the former directors to pay them off. Think there is now a wait until they resolve who swallows the £7m that was unaccounted for.
    Still can’t get over how this £7m was missed in the first place. I could’ve swore we all knew this and were openly commenting about it when Cash took over? I seem to remember there was always talk of money owed to Murray etc on the basis we got to the prem

    Or am I confusing the two??
  • It must be realised that we are a middling League 1 team, owned by an idiot with his own ideas on how to be successful in football and in the process(?) of being sold to an Australian consortium, that also has never run an English football team and is in no hurry to start learning. How anyone can expect this season to be a success, I do not know. All we can hope is that the takeover eventually goes through, the Aussies get themselves and the club sorted out and we have a reasonable season and be prepared, (you have heard it before) for next season
  • ^^^ this. And ‘shitweasel’, loving that.
  • Sponsored links:


  • clb74 said:

    JamesSeed said:

    clb74 said:

    Both sides are taking the f@cking piss and can both do one

    Top idea. Let’s stick with Roland then.
    Let's say I've got it wrong then and the Aussies are offering half the 7 million surely there comes a point when the Aussies walk away.
    As I see the situation if Roland sells to the Aussies halfway through September I will be very surprised if we were to be in the mix come January, meaning the the Aussies have funded us for a season for nothing.
    would be nice if those buying us maybe approached those owed and asked what they may want instead of waiting for some old bstd who gives no shits about anything to do it
    Exactly.

    And from as far as I've read, they haven't approached them at any stage. Why is that if they're so keen to get the deal done?
  • Addickted said:

    clb74 said:

    JamesSeed said:

    clb74 said:

    Both sides are taking the f@cking piss and can both do one

    Top idea. Let’s stick with Roland then.
    Let's say I've got it wrong then and the Aussies are offering half the 7 million surely there comes a point when the Aussies walk away.
    As I see the situation if Roland sells to the Aussies halfway through September I will be very surprised if we were to be in the mix come January, meaning the the Aussies have funded us for a season for nothing.
    would be nice if those buying us maybe approached those owed and asked what they may want instead of waiting for some old bstd who gives no shits about anything to do it
    Exactly.

    And from as far as I've read, they haven't approached them at any stage. Why is that if they're so keen to get the deal done?
    Murray probably said he'll speak to them. Didn't bother.
    Came back a week later and said they're sweet.
  • Addickted said:

    clb74 said:

    JamesSeed said:

    clb74 said:

    Both sides are taking the f@cking piss and can both do one

    Top idea. Let’s stick with Roland then.
    Let's say I've got it wrong then and the Aussies are offering half the 7 million surely there comes a point when the Aussies walk away.
    As I see the situation if Roland sells to the Aussies halfway through September I will be very surprised if we were to be in the mix come January, meaning the the Aussies have funded us for a season for nothing.
    would be nice if those buying us maybe approached those owed and asked what they may want instead of waiting for some old bstd who gives no shits about anything to do it
    Exactly.

    And from as far as I've read, they haven't approached them at any stage. Why is that if they're so keen to get the deal done?
    Maybe the Aussies have completed their side of the deal but Roland hasnt completed his?

    If the deal was £35m but the seller sorts out the debentures then the Aussies have done their bit.

    Maybe Roland should have contacted and made a deal with all the old directors a long time ago or offered more than 25% when he did?

    WIOTOS
  • In not speculating mate I'm saying MY club is dying and that is a FACT ------ I have no idea who any of the buyers are or if they ACTUALLY exist at all ,only what I have read on here. Your putting your faith in what you have been told directly and you believe that to be kosher ,we all hope it's kosher as well.

    To be honest I'll still plot up to have a beer with mates no matter what shit league we are in ,assuming we exist.However if we don't hear anything after the Norwich game (that's at the end of that game) which is the latest bollox deadline then I suggest that's this thread can DO ONE and all those "in the know" keep it zipped and we just get on with following a RD owned CAFC until Bob Hope comes riding over Shootershill to save us--- seems more likely.



    “MY club”? How is it your club?

    Are you the new owner?
  • Addickted said:

    clb74 said:

    JamesSeed said:

    clb74 said:

    Both sides are taking the f@cking piss and can both do one

    Top idea. Let’s stick with Roland then.
    Let's say I've got it wrong then and the Aussies are offering half the 7 million surely there comes a point when the Aussies walk away.
    As I see the situation if Roland sells to the Aussies halfway through September I will be very surprised if we were to be in the mix come January, meaning the the Aussies have funded us for a season for nothing.
    would be nice if those buying us maybe approached those owed and asked what they may want instead of waiting for some old bstd who gives no shits about anything to do it
    Exactly.

    And from as far as I've read, they haven't approached them at any stage. Why is that if they're so keen to get the deal done?
    Maybe the Aussies have completed their side of the deal but Roland hasnt completed his?

    If the deal was £35m but the seller sorts out the debentures then the Aussies have done their bit.

    Maybe Roland should have contacted and made a deal with all the old directors a long time ago or offered more than 25% when he did?

    WIOTOS
    So the debentures are a stumbling block?

    So why haven't the Aussies at least attempted to get passed this barrier?

    If they know this is what's holding up the sale, surely you'd want to know what your potential liability would be, should you decide to wait no longer?
  • The 5 year plan, will have a massive wasted first the way this is going, so a 4 year plan from League 2 is going to be a horror show
  • Addickted said:

    Addickted said:

    clb74 said:

    JamesSeed said:

    clb74 said:

    Both sides are taking the f@cking piss and can both do one

    Top idea. Let’s stick with Roland then.
    Let's say I've got it wrong then and the Aussies are offering half the 7 million surely there comes a point when the Aussies walk away.
    As I see the situation if Roland sells to the Aussies halfway through September I will be very surprised if we were to be in the mix come January, meaning the the Aussies have funded us for a season for nothing.
    would be nice if those buying us maybe approached those owed and asked what they may want instead of waiting for some old bstd who gives no shits about anything to do it
    Exactly.

    And from as far as I've read, they haven't approached them at any stage. Why is that if they're so keen to get the deal done?
    Maybe the Aussies have completed their side of the deal but Roland hasnt completed his?

    If the deal was £35m but the seller sorts out the debentures then the Aussies have done their bit.

    Maybe Roland should have contacted and made a deal with all the old directors a long time ago or offered more than 25% when he did?

    WIOTOS
    So the debentures are a stumbling block?

    So why haven't the Aussies at least attempted to get passed this barrier?

    If they know this is what's holding up the sale, surely you'd want to know what your potential liability would be, should you decide to wait no longer?
    Maybe they have, I don't know.

    Easy solution. Roland knocks £7m off the price and the Aussies pay the old directors.

    But maybe Roland doesn't fancy that.
  • He could have done that months ago. He hasn't.

    We've also heard on here that the Consortium haven't approached the debenture holders.

    I would certainly advice them to at least investigate what any potential liability may be coming our way. Wouldn't you?
This discussion has been closed.

Roland Out Forever!