Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Options

The Takeover Thread - Duchatelet Finally Sells (Jan 2020)

1115511561158116011612262

Comments

  • RedChaser said:

    JamesSeed said:

    JamesSeed said:

    Red7Oak said:

    JamesSeed said:

    Aussies deal has collapsed.

    ?
    Red7Oak said:

    JamesSeed said:

    JamesSeed said:



    Scoham said:

    Click on it to read it. Basically says Keith Harris has been trying to find new investors so the takeover can go through, and that it’s unclear if that’s happened. If it hasn’t happened it says it’s in danger of collapsing.

    Ahem “Aussies ain’t got the money”

    Drops mic and walks away could’ve closed the thread in October
    Ah, so this is the famous ‘waving of the willy’ that I’ve heard so much about ;-)
    seems to be what the SLP are indicating @JamesSeed i think theres been so much dragging of heels that people interested have said i am off
    Fair play if you turned out to be right all along. As I’ve said I’ve only had very little info since the beer meeting, and none of that was financial.
    Of course we still don’t know definitively what’s going on, but I guess we’ll hear soon.
    If they’ve failed it’s a damned shame, because I think they had the potential to give us ‘proper’ ownership for the first time in years.
    I think anyone has the potential to give us 'proper' ownership but let's face initially it at the time of takeover we thought the same about RD and the spivs! :(
    The difference here being that no one knew them personally did they? (As far as I know).
    I wouldn’t have said those things if I didn’t know GM, who I know for a fact isn’t/wasn’t trying to make a land grab, at least.
    Apologies I didnt know you personally knew GM I thought your insight / opinion came from one of the lackey's who worked for him. Not withstanding that, in my opinion, and bar telling people snippets of what they want to hear, SomeoSomeone would have to know someone extremely well to share detailed information about their business plans especially parts that they might not want out in the public domain!

    They didn’t share any details about their business plans, other than that it was a five year plan.
    Which we already knew.
    How did you know that?
    I can't remember it was said so long ago.

    The 5 year plan was to get the under performing club into The Premier League and then sell up.
    Wasn't it in their prospectus or am I dreaming that?
    I think so. I looked on their website before posting, but couldn't see it.
    But I didn't imagine it, so you're probably right.
  • edited August 2018

    Scoham said:

    https://www.lovesportradio.com/on-air/the-charlton-fans-show/

    Listen to todays "The Charlton Fans Show" on Love Sport Radio. John Salako said he spoke to someone recently about a business plan being put together to move from The Valley to a brand new stadium in the local area.

    If true the question is who's putting that together? And is it an attempt to try to attract potential new owners?

    Utter bollocks. This would need a profit between Peninsula and Valley. Apart from the steep side issues and overlooked by flats, access only via Charlton Lane wouldn't get through planning. A new road under the railway would have to be built. Oh and it has been tried before. Ask Back to the Valley Party activists.
    What has a new stadium 2 miles from The Valley got to do with Charlton Lane etc ?
  • He’s referring to developing the Valley if we moved.
  • edited August 2018

    Scoham said:

    https://www.lovesportradio.com/on-air/the-charlton-fans-show/

    Listen to todays "The Charlton Fans Show" on Love Sport Radio. John Salako said he spoke to someone recently about a business plan being put together to move from The Valley to a brand new stadium in the local area.

    If true the question is who's putting that together? And is it an attempt to try to attract potential new owners?

    Utter bollocks. This would need a profit between Peninsula and Valley. Apart from the steep side issues and overlooked by flats, access only via Charlton Lane wouldn't get through planning. A new road under the railway would have to be built. Oh and it has been tried before. Ask Back to the Valley Party activists.
    What has a new stadium 2 miles from The Valley got to do with Charlton Lane etc ?
    Ah I see, I apologise.
  • I gave up on the takeover 300 pages ago. I have felt much better ever since. I highly recommend it. Getting aligned with "what is" does wonders.
  • Roland Duchatelet is to blame for our plight

    When it’s confirmed it’s all off then the Aussies will be accountable for assisting in the death toll

    They cost us the Saudi bid that would’ve been extremely beneficial

    RD was never going to accept a bid that was less money just because it would be good for cafc

    So. Roland was conned. Any conman will tell you that people are only conned when they want to be conned.
  • I don’t think anyone was conned I think there was a gamble made by aussies and RD that didn’t work

    I was told very early on that RD was not keen on the deal that may be best for cafc long term

    I think both wanted to get it done in the beginning but then it fell apart.

  • I don’t think anyone was conned I think there was a gamble made by aussies and RD that didn’t work

    I was told very early on that RD was not keen on the deal that may be best for cafc long term

    I think both wanted to get it done in the beginning but then it fell apart.

    What was the deal that might be best?
  • Sponsored links:


  • I don’t think anyone was conned I think there was a gamble made by aussies and RD that didn’t work

    I was told very early on that RD was not keen on the deal that may be best for cafc long term

    I think both wanted to get it done in the beginning but then it fell apart.

    That seems about right to me. Thanks for bringing a dose of reality to this thread
  • Should have got the Arabs, rather than the Aussies upping their bid when they didn’t even have finances in place.

  • the lookman theory is bollocks coz the aussies would surely pay that so we could get players in before deadline day
  • So no blame any where else

    That’s ridiculous

    I agree with both these statements. (If by "that", you mean Roland).
  • I know its been an absolute nightmare and we all want roland gone asap, but... is there anything more to these rumours that it's off than there have been the last 5 times the takeover was rumoured to be dead?
  • Might as well announce after the window has closed, blame the Aussies for the shambles of a squad we're left with.
  • Stig said:

    I don’t think anyone was conned I think there was a gamble made by aussies and RD that didn’t work

    I was told very early on that RD was not keen on the deal that may be best for cafc long term

    I think both wanted to get it done in the beginning but then it fell apart.

    I don't understand, if RD was not keen on the Aussie deal why did he let the Saudi's slip away? It strikes me he is just a very greedy man who has overpriced his assets and now we are all paying the price for that. I don't blame the Saudi's for walking away, I don't blame the Aussies for sticking around and trying to to get a reasonable deal. There's only one person to blame for the mess that's the bloke who bought the club, didn't understand it, didn't try to understand it, arrogantly denied his mistakes rather than trying to learn from them, epitomised the reverse-Midas touch as everything he touched turned to shit and when the club crashed and burned decided to sell for a price significantly more than he'd paid for it. The bloke is a Grade A arsehole, there's absolutely no need to go scratching around looking for someone else to blame.
    It will as the Saudi deal he wasn’t keen on he wanted the Aussie one imo

    No one is saying he ain’t to blame he is to blame

    But there’s others that need to explain why they bid for s club that they didn’t have the funding in place to complete and why they out bid a group that did have clear funds
  • Stig said:

    I don’t think anyone was conned I think there was a gamble made by aussies and RD that didn’t work

    I was told very early on that RD was not keen on the deal that may be best for cafc long term

    I think both wanted to get it done in the beginning but then it fell apart.

    I don't understand, if RD was not keen on the Aussie deal why did he let the Saudi's slip away? It strikes me he is just a very greedy man who has overpriced his assets and now we are all paying the price for that. I don't blame the Saudi's for walking away, I don't blame the Aussies for sticking around and trying to to get a reasonable deal. There's only one person to blame for the mess that's the bloke who bought the club, didn't understand it, didn't try to understand it, arrogantly denied his mistakes rather than trying to learn from them, epitomised the reverse-Midas touch as everything he touched turned to shit and when the club crashed and burned decided to sell for a price significantly more than he'd paid for it. The bloke is a Grade A arsehole, there's absolutely no need to go scratching around looking for someone else to blame.
    If the Aussies bid more than the Saudis, then it’s hardly surprising that he went for their bid, we all would have.

    If their bid falls through, they have to shoulder part of the blame
  • Sponsored links:


  • 34.8k comments

    Remember every post on this thread is another new seat at the new stadium.

    Maybe the takeover will happen when we have 40k comments and a blueprint for a 40k stadium on the Peninsular.
  • Stig said:

    I don’t think anyone was conned I think there was a gamble made by aussies and RD that didn’t work

    I was told very early on that RD was not keen on the deal that may be best for cafc long term

    I think both wanted to get it done in the beginning but then it fell apart.

    I don't understand, if RD was not keen on the Aussie deal why did he let the Saudi's slip away? It strikes me he is just a very greedy man who has overpriced his assets and now we are all paying the price for that. I don't blame the Saudi's for walking away, I don't blame the Aussies for sticking around and trying to to get a reasonable deal. There's only one person to blame for the mess that's the bloke who bought the club, didn't understand it, didn't try to understand it, arrogantly denied his mistakes rather than trying to learn from them, epitomised the reverse-Midas touch as everything he touched turned to shit and when the club crashed and burned decided to sell for a price significantly more than he'd paid for it. The bloke is a Grade A arsehole, there's absolutely no need to go scratching around looking for someone else to blame.
    It will as the Saudi deal he wasn’t keen on he wanted the Aussie one imo

    No one is saying he ain’t to blame he is to blame

    But there’s others that need to explain why they bid for s club that they didn’t have the funding in place to complete and why they out bid a group that did have clear funds
    I'm convinced they believed they could haggle at the last minute - which they attempted - to get the club at the 'right' price, they didn't expect RD to hold firm, at which point their plan started to fall apart.
  • 34.8k comments

    Remember every post on this thread is another new seat at the new stadium.

    Maybe the takeover will happen when we have 40k comments and a blueprint for a 40k stadium on the Peninsular.

    If you look at the peninsular now and the Chinese developers' proposed housing/retail/office plans you will not find space for a new stadium. The space needed would not generate enough use to make it worthwhile.
  • edited August 2018
    Valley11 said:

    I don’t think anyone was conned I think there was a gamble made by aussies and RD that didn’t work

    I was told very early on that RD was not keen on the deal that may be best for cafc long term

    I think both wanted to get it done in the beginning but then it fell apart.

    What was the deal that might be best?
    image
  • Fumbluff said:

    Valley11 said:

    I don’t think anyone was conned I think there was a gamble made by aussies and RD that didn’t work

    I was told very early on that RD was not keen on the deal that may be best for cafc long term

    I think both wanted to get it done in the beginning but then it fell apart.

    What was the deal that might be best?
    image
    Mr Ben?

    "As if by magic... the shopkeeper appeared." Hopefully he will buy the club.
  • So has anyone confirmed it's off/on?
  • edited August 2018
    I bet Murray has a clue
This discussion has been closed.

Roland Out Forever!