Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Banned after Accrington
Comments
-
SDAddick said:
I think it was brilliant. But if you go on the pitch, you are removed and I think usually get a ban. Nobody is talking about anything other than that.RodneyCharltonTrotta said:Take it those saying it is right would be saying that those throwing pigs and crisp packets on the pitch or going on there after the Burnley game should also be banned? Would not surprise me.
Complete lack of common sense and lack of proportionality. Go on there and threaten a player etc fair enough but celebrating a last minute winner in a tense match ffs. Can see how damp squib bores are applauding this banning of fellow fans and the old suited morons that run the game insist on it.
The club is run by morons and is lucky it has any fans at all left. The EFL need to pay a bit more attention as to who they approve to run English football institutions.
Pathetic club at times with some reall dull followers.
Also, we're relying on second and third hand information here. And it's worth noting that we don't know how long they've been banned for. If it's for life, completely agree, that's ridiculous. If it's until the end of the season, I would say yeah fair enough.
Again, it's a brilliant moment. But contained within it is a great reason why it's not legal, you could injur a player, even if it's unintentional. I feel like you have the whole cause and effect right there. As with bad tackles, the idea that "nobody got hurt" is not usually the best way to uphold the law.
Also, it's not clear what choice, if any, the club has in this. So for all the things we hate them for, it might be worth having a more thorough understanding of the situation.
Again, if it's a lifetime ban or multi-year ban I'm with you, it's silly. But again, I just think the cause and effect here are pretty straightforward.
just seen from one who has been banned that its only for the rest of this season.
1 -
Safety? Really, who was in danger in this instance. There have been numerous instances of it happening at other clubs this season and nothing happens.SDAddick said:I mean, you can't run on the pitch or you'll be banned. This is a known. It was a great moment of celebration but for all the dumb rules and laws in the world, this is one that makes sense, it's for the players' (and fans') safety, in case, ya know, you kick one in the bollocks!0 -
How do you know??redman said:
Safety? Really, who was in danger in this instance. There have been numerous instances of it happening at other clubs this season and nothing happens.SDAddick said:I mean, you can't run on the pitch or you'll be banned. This is a known. It was a great moment of celebration but for all the dumb rules and laws in the world, this is one that makes sense, it's for the players' (and fans') safety, in case, ya know, you kick one in the bollocks!
The club have not announced this and have seemed to have dealt with it behind the scenes.
Other clubs probably do the same, so you cant say for certain that no other club have banned fans for running onto the pitch this season1 -
Bielik's bollocks!!!redman said:
Safety? Really, who was in danger in this instance. There have been numerous instances of it happening at other clubs this season and nothing happens.SDAddick said:I mean, you can't run on the pitch or you'll be banned. This is a known. It was a great moment of celebration but for all the dumb rules and laws in the world, this is one that makes sense, it's for the players' (and fans') safety, in case, ya know, you kick one in the bollocks!2 -
redman said:
Safety? Really, who was in danger in this instance. There have been numerous instances of it happening at other clubs this season and nothing happens.SDAddick said:I mean, you can't run on the pitch or you'll be banned. This is a known. It was a great moment of celebration but for all the dumb rules and laws in the world, this is one that makes sense, it's for the players' (and fans') safety, in case, ya know, you kick one in the bollocks!Krystian Bielik looked in quite a lot of danger !
2 -
Plus Bielik himself will be in trouble...SDAddick said:
Bielik's bollocks!!!redman said:
Safety? Really, who was in danger in this instance. There have been numerous instances of it happening at other clubs this season and nothing happens.SDAddick said:I mean, you can't run on the pitch or you'll be banned. This is a known. It was a great moment of celebration but for all the dumb rules and laws in the world, this is one that makes sense, it's for the players' (and fans') safety, in case, ya know, you kick one in the bollocks!
a few more kicks in that region and he'll be in deep trouble if he ever tells a missus he cant have kids1 -
Which, if true, I say yeah fair enough.Karim_myBagheri said:SDAddick said:
I think it was brilliant. But if you go on the pitch, you are removed and I think usually get a ban. Nobody is talking about anything other than that.RodneyCharltonTrotta said:Take it those saying it is right would be saying that those throwing pigs and crisp packets on the pitch or going on there after the Burnley game should also be banned? Would not surprise me.
Complete lack of common sense and lack of proportionality. Go on there and threaten a player etc fair enough but celebrating a last minute winner in a tense match ffs. Can see how damp squib bores are applauding this banning of fellow fans and the old suited morons that run the game insist on it.
The club is run by morons and is lucky it has any fans at all left. The EFL need to pay a bit more attention as to who they approve to run English football institutions.
Pathetic club at times with some reall dull followers.
Also, we're relying on second and third hand information here. And it's worth noting that we don't know how long they've been banned for. If it's for life, completely agree, that's ridiculous. If it's until the end of the season, I would say yeah fair enough.
Again, it's a brilliant moment. But contained within it is a great reason why it's not legal, you could injur a player, even if it's unintentional. I feel like you have the whole cause and effect right there. As with bad tackles, the idea that "nobody got hurt" is not usually the best way to uphold the law.
Also, it's not clear what choice, if any, the club has in this. So for all the things we hate them for, it might be worth having a more thorough understanding of the situation.
Again, if it's a lifetime ban or multi-year ban I'm with you, it's silly. But again, I just think the cause and effect here are pretty straightforward.
just seen from one who has been banned that its only for the rest of this season.
It doesn't make them bad people, and I really hope this doesn't mean they have a criminal record--and if they do or if there are consequences that go beyond football then I would probably change my mind. So if I'm being naive here or if there are consequences I don't know about, I apologize. But a, ten-ish match ban for running on to the pitch? That doesn't strike me as super unreasonable.0 -
west ham have banned fans for pitch invasions. some banned for over 3 years. they were pitch invasions rather than a quick celebration in the corner of the ground. often in the lower leagues fans jump over to celebrate with the players. always thought it was fine as long as you jump back over quickly and dont do anything out of order. (goading the opposition players or fans etc)2
-
A Spanner with teeth !!!!!Big_Bad_World said:MrOneLung said:
They weren't even Charlton fans.Big_Bad_World said:Absolutely the right decision.
There's no place in the game for behaviour like that.
It was West Ham looking to do over Accrington.
A likely story, young man.I'm too long in the tooth for those kind of tales.
Is that a first ?
( Love you really, BBW )16 -
If they’ve just been banned by the club then there will be no criminal record stuff. Would need police/court action for that and it doesn’t sound like the case here.SDAddick said:
Which, if true, I say yeah fair enough.Karim_myBagheri said:SDAddick said:
I think it was brilliant. But if you go on the pitch, you are removed and I think usually get a ban. Nobody is talking about anything other than that.RodneyCharltonTrotta said:Take it those saying it is right would be saying that those throwing pigs and crisp packets on the pitch or going on there after the Burnley game should also be banned? Would not surprise me.
Complete lack of common sense and lack of proportionality. Go on there and threaten a player etc fair enough but celebrating a last minute winner in a tense match ffs. Can see how damp squib bores are applauding this banning of fellow fans and the old suited morons that run the game insist on it.
The club is run by morons and is lucky it has any fans at all left. The EFL need to pay a bit more attention as to who they approve to run English football institutions.
Pathetic club at times with some reall dull followers.
Also, we're relying on second and third hand information here. And it's worth noting that we don't know how long they've been banned for. If it's for life, completely agree, that's ridiculous. If it's until the end of the season, I would say yeah fair enough.
Again, it's a brilliant moment. But contained within it is a great reason why it's not legal, you could injur a player, even if it's unintentional. I feel like you have the whole cause and effect right there. As with bad tackles, the idea that "nobody got hurt" is not usually the best way to uphold the law.
Also, it's not clear what choice, if any, the club has in this. So for all the things we hate them for, it might be worth having a more thorough understanding of the situation.
Again, if it's a lifetime ban or multi-year ban I'm with you, it's silly. But again, I just think the cause and effect here are pretty straightforward.
just seen from one who has been banned that its only for the rest of this season.
It doesn't make them bad people, and I really hope this doesn't mean they have a criminal record--and if they do or if there are consequences that go beyond football then I would probably change my mind. So if I'm being naive here or if there are consequences I don't know about, I apologize. But a, ten-ish match ban for running on to the pitch? That doesn't strike me as super unreasonable.
A 10 game ban isn’t the end of the world (still think a letter in the post or a telling off in person would have been sufficient unless their is prior history that suggests a harsher punishment is required).
Hope they are allowed to go to Wembley if we get to the playoff final.1 - Sponsored links:
-
You don’t get a criminal record for being banned from a football ground. No trial, no verdict or sentence. No record.SDAddick said:
Which, if true, I say yeah fair enough.Karim_myBagheri said:SDAddick said:
I think it was brilliant. But if you go on the pitch, you are removed and I think usually get a ban. Nobody is talking about anything other than that.RodneyCharltonTrotta said:Take it those saying it is right would be saying that those throwing pigs and crisp packets on the pitch or going on there after the Burnley game should also be banned? Would not surprise me.
Complete lack of common sense and lack of proportionality. Go on there and threaten a player etc fair enough but celebrating a last minute winner in a tense match ffs. Can see how damp squib bores are applauding this banning of fellow fans and the old suited morons that run the game insist on it.
The club is run by morons and is lucky it has any fans at all left. The EFL need to pay a bit more attention as to who they approve to run English football institutions.
Pathetic club at times with some reall dull followers.
Also, we're relying on second and third hand information here. And it's worth noting that we don't know how long they've been banned for. If it's for life, completely agree, that's ridiculous. If it's until the end of the season, I would say yeah fair enough.
Again, it's a brilliant moment. But contained within it is a great reason why it's not legal, you could injur a player, even if it's unintentional. I feel like you have the whole cause and effect right there. As with bad tackles, the idea that "nobody got hurt" is not usually the best way to uphold the law.
Also, it's not clear what choice, if any, the club has in this. So for all the things we hate them for, it might be worth having a more thorough understanding of the situation.
Again, if it's a lifetime ban or multi-year ban I'm with you, it's silly. But again, I just think the cause and effect here are pretty straightforward.
just seen from one who has been banned that its only for the rest of this season.
It doesn't make them bad people, and I really hope this doesn't mean they have a criminal record--and if they do or if there are consequences that go beyond football then I would probably change my mind. So if I'm being naive here or if there are consequences I don't know about, I apologize. But a, ten-ish match ban for running on to the pitch? That doesn't strike me as super unreasonable.2 -
WestStandNeil said:Based on this persons twitter feed on the subject someone called Mark Anderson hass been banned for the rest of the season.
Top fella he is
3 -
SDAddick said:
Bielik's bollocks!!!redman said:
Safety? Really, who was in danger in this instance. There have been numerous instances of it happening at other clubs this season and nothing happens.SDAddick said:I mean, you can't run on the pitch or you'll be banned. This is a known. It was a great moment of celebration but for all the dumb rules and laws in the world, this is one that makes sense, it's for the players' (and fans') safety, in case, ya know, you kick one in the bollocks!
Hilarious, but supposed he'd been a bit lower down and broke his ankle, wonder what the reaction to that would have been on here?1 -
addick05 said:SDAddick said:
Bielik's bollocks!!!redman said:
Safety? Really, who was in danger in this instance. There have been numerous instances of it happening at other clubs this season and nothing happens.SDAddick said:I mean, you can't run on the pitch or you'll be banned. This is a known. It was a great moment of celebration but for all the dumb rules and laws in the world, this is one that makes sense, it's for the players' (and fans') safety, in case, ya know, you kick one in the bollocks!
Hilarious, but supposed he'd been a bit lower down and broke his ankle, wonder what the reaction to that would have been on here?
And what would have happened if a Pig had hit a player in the eye and blinded him????The ban is ridiculous and as others have pointed out, why haven't both the Burnley fans and Charlton fans who invaded the pitch got bans (if it was actually the FA making them do it etc)
0 -
May be nearly getting on the pitch whilst the match hasn’t finished is considered a worse offence than entering it at the end of the game .
was it this game where a fan was jumping around the penalty area at the end of the game0 -
Yes.oohaahmortimer said:May be nearly getting on the pitch whilst the match hasn’t finished is considered a worse offence than entering it at the end of the game .
was it this game where a fan was jumping around the penalty area at the end of the game0 -
Lucky guyWestStandNeil said:Based on this persons twitter feed on the subject someone called Mark Anderson hass been banned for the rest of the season.0 -
There's celebrating a last minute winner and there is invading the pitch. We were playing Accrington Stanley for God's sake, how often does this happen (last minute winner not playing them, that's going to be the norm for a long time)?
The club are up shit creek in terms of supporter disillusionment and right at a time when the ones still going and suffering the strangulation of being a dushitalot franchise have an opportunity to express some elation they do this.
I'm not surprised, for years I've thought our support is characterless and to ban a handful of people who have still had it about them to get excited just shows how little the franchisers think of us
We had real momentum and a very real chance of catching the top 2, I accept once any player shows anything resembling pedigree or promise they are sold, it's not like the horrible old prick didn't tell us this when he came in. It's his business model
Now come the end of the season we might have an outside chance of making the play offs but that's it. Bowyer and Jackson will be offered work elsewhere and then we really are in the shit. Now Bowyer is speaking as he feels to the press he is on his last legs, Shitarse won't sack him because that will cost him money and he can just let him.leave for bugger all when his so tract expires in the summer
Worst of all, we've now reached a point where those who have made the understandable move of renewing as opposed to boycotting because of emotional attachments will be just watching a club die. This cannot continue beyond the summer. With the contract situation approaching we are in trouble regarding playing staff as it is. If a takeover doesn't happen sharpish there will be kids and 3 senior players to work with next pre season and about 3000 season ticket holders to watch the death throes
7 -
Completely agree. Or even slightly lower and you catch him in the knee and he does his ACL. Or the fans slip because they don't have studs and it's wet out, and they crack their head open.addick05 said:SDAddick said:
Bielik's bollocks!!!
Hilarious, but supposed he'd been a bit lower down and broke his ankle, wonder what the reaction to that would have been on here?
I know, there's a lot of silly health and safety stuff. And to some extent I imagine this is perfunctory. I'd be curious if this is an automatic ban, who decides it, etc. But I do think there's a good reason for these rules being in place.se9addick said:
If they’ve just been banned by the club then there will be no criminal record stuff. Would need police/court action for that and it doesn’t sound like the case here.SDAddick said:
just seen from one who has been banned that its only for the rest of this season.
A 10 game ban isn’t the end of the world (still think a letter in the post or a telling off in person would have been sufficient unless their is prior history that suggests a harsher punishment is required).
Hope they are allowed to go to Wembley if we get to the playoff final.
Cheers to both of you, glad there's no record or anything. It's a good point @se9, a letter might well have sufficed here and I didn't really think about that. Completely agree about Wembley.JamesSeed said:
You don’t get a criminal record for being banned from a football ground. No trial, no verdict or sentence. No record.SDAddick said:Karim_myBagheri said:SDAddick said:
I think it was brilliant. But if you go on the pitch, you are removed and I think usually get a ban. Nobody is talking about anything other than that.RodneyCharltonTrotta said:Take it those saying it is right would be saying that those throwing pigs and crisp packets on the pitch or going on there after the Burnley game should also be banned? Would not surprise me.
Complete lack of common sense and lack of proportionality. Go on there and threaten a player etc fair enough but celebrating a last minute winner in a tense match ffs. Can see how damp squib bores are applauding this banning of fellow fans and the old suited morons that run the game insist on it.
The club is run by morons and is lucky it has any fans at all left. The EFL need to pay a bit more attention as to who they approve to run English football institutions.
Pathetic club at times with some reall dull followers.
Also, we're relying on second and third hand information here. And it's worth noting that we don't know how long they've been banned for. If it's for life, completely agree, that's ridiculous. If it's until the end of the season, I would say yeah fair enough.
Again, it's a brilliant moment. But contained within it is a great reason why it's not legal, you could injur a player, even if it's unintentional. I feel like you have the whole cause and effect right there. As with bad tackles, the idea that "nobody got hurt" is not usually the best way to uphold the law.
Also, it's not clear what choice, if any, the club has in this. So for all the things we hate them for, it might be worth having a more thorough understanding of the situation.
Again, if it's a lifetime ban or multi-year ban I'm with you, it's silly. But again, I just think the cause and effect here are pretty straightforward.
The whole thing just feels like one of those challenges where you've gone in, yeah you've gotten a bit of the ball, but your fall through was out of control and you've wiped the man out in a dangerous way. Kind of like Kightly's booking on Saturday. Could the ref let you off with a warning? Yeah, he could. But you also can't really argue for being booked.
Again, se9 makes a couple very good points. Maybe the lads will be able to meet with the club/league representative and have it reduced, I'd be all in favor of that. My initial point was, these rules are in place and I think there's a good reason for it.0 -
Next goal scored in front of the covered end,all on the pitch in support of the banned fans,I blame Karlan Grant !!!0
- Sponsored links:
-
Next goal will probably be scored by Blackpool.bertpalmer said:Next goal scored in front of the covered end,all on the pitch in support of the banned fans,I blame Karlan Grant !!!
I ain't celebrating that.9 -
There would of been a few bans flying about if that pen had gone in at peterborough2
-
You can be banned from all football ground for entering the playing area.0
-
WHAT IF HE’D HAD A GUN!addick05 said:SDAddick said:
Bielik's bollocks!!!redman said:
Safety? Really, who was in danger in this instance. There have been numerous instances of it happening at other clubs this season and nothing happens.SDAddick said:I mean, you can't run on the pitch or you'll be banned. This is a known. It was a great moment of celebration but for all the dumb rules and laws in the world, this is one that makes sense, it's for the players' (and fans') safety, in case, ya know, you kick one in the bollocks!
Hilarious, but supposed he'd been a bit lower down and broke his ankle, wonder what the reaction to that would have been on here?12 -
se9addick said:
WHAT IF HE’D HAD A GUN!addick05 said:SDAddick said:
Bielik's bollocks!!!redman said:
Safety? Really, who was in danger in this instance. There have been numerous instances of it happening at other clubs this season and nothing happens.SDAddick said:I mean, you can't run on the pitch or you'll be banned. This is a known. It was a great moment of celebration but for all the dumb rules and laws in the world, this is one that makes sense, it's for the players' (and fans') safety, in case, ya know, you kick one in the bollocks!
Hilarious, but supposed he'd been a bit lower down and broke his ankle, wonder what the reaction to that would have been on here?
7 -
blackpool72 said: Next goal will probably be scored by Blackpool.I ain't celebrating that.Charlton72 said:why not it's who you support isn't it
2 -
You won't get over the barriersbertpalmer said:Next goal scored in front of the covered end,all on the pitch in support of the banned fans,I blame Karlan Grant !!!2 -
se9addick said:
WHAT IF HE’D HAD A GUN!addick05 said:SDAddick said:
Bielik's bollocks!!!redman said:
Safety? Really, who was in danger in this instance. There have been numerous instances of it happening at other clubs this season and nothing happens.SDAddick said:I mean, you can't run on the pitch or you'll be banned. This is a known. It was a great moment of celebration but for all the dumb rules and laws in the world, this is one that makes sense, it's for the players' (and fans') safety, in case, ya know, you kick one in the bollocks!
Hilarious, but supposed he'd been a bit lower down and broke his ankle, wonder what the reaction to that would have been on here?
28 -
I think a warning that a repeat would be an automatic 1 year ban would have been more sensible to those concerned and everybody else. Everybody would know the score!3
-
clb74 said:
You won't get over the barriersbertpalmer said:Next goal scored in front of the covered end,all on the pitch in support of the banned fans,I blame Karlan Grant !!!
What barriers? Im on the bench!!!0
