Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Ipswich pursue Curb's.
SoundAsa£
Posts: 22,521
According to BBC Ceefax page 338....source.....todays Mirror.
0
Comments
-
I said about 2 months ago he will be their next manager.
I saw it in one of Mortamerician's dreams !0 -
That yung2368 fella will be suicidal.0
-
I thought you said you were only 60!! ;-)[cite]Posted By: SoundAsa£[/cite]According to BBC Ceefax page 338.0 -
?0
-
when did he get an apostrophe in his name?0
-
Salad...I'm sitting in my office with two ex-Roan grammar school boys(both in their 70's I may add), who tell me that's correct....Curb's...my spelling isn't that great I know but my punctuation isn't that bad...I think we're right here?0
-
[cite]Posted By: SoundAsa£[/cite]Salad...I'm sitting in my office with two ex-Roan grammar school boys(both in their 70's I may add), who tell me that's correct....Curb's...my spelling isn't that great I know but my punctuation isn't that bad...I think we're right here?
Think Salad is right. It would be correct if it was Curbs' job/book but not as a nickname. Could be justified as a contraction of Curbishley as in wasn't or hasn't but I think that is stretching a point
For example Pard's is wrong, Pards would be correct.
(grammatically not in terms of employment obviously)
I went to a comprehensive BTW : - )0 -
They are wrong sorry!
His nickname is "Curbs", so even if there were to be an apostrophe it would be after the "s", for example:
Ipswich pursue Curbs' signature.0 -
a's did I[cite]Posted By: Henry Irving[/cite]I went to a comprehensive BTW : - )0 -
[cite]Posted By: Salad[/cite]
a's did I[cite]Posted By: Henry Irving[/cite]I went to a comprehensive BTW : - )
I went to Crown Wood's ; - )0 -
Sponsored links:
-
however "Curb's pursued by Ipswich" now thats ok0
-
Would it not have to be "Curbs's pursued by ipswich" as in "Curbs is"?0
-
only if his nickname's "Curb", which it ain't[cite]Posted By: scruffle[/cite]however "Curb's pursued by Ipswich" now thats ok0 -
Salad or rather S'alad as he seems to have suddenly become:-) is correct.0
-
He may well be correct but i cannot believe he even pointed it out.0
-
In English, the first person pronoun should always be capitalised :-)[cite]Posted By: Curb_It[/cite]He may well be correct but i cannot believe he even pointed it out.0 -
I can't believe you are all going on about the bloody apostrophes and have missed the glaringly obvious cockup that Ipwich Council's highways department has made. Surely it should be Kerb not curb?0
-
Not really - since 'persued' isn't a real word.[cite]Posted By: Dazzler21[/cite]Would it not have to be "Curbs's persued by ipswich" as in "Curbs is"?0 -
Salad's opened up a can of tuna here!!!!!!0
-
Hahaha one of the best posts on here for ages!
I wonder if the Millwall and Palace fans have similar grammatical debates.
Just for the record, Curbs is without an apostrophe. Curb's suggests he is taking ownership of something or that it's an abbreviation of his name, which of course it is not.
That said, I think we all understood what you meant Sound.0 -
Sponsored links:
-
If his nickname is Curbs, then it should be - Ipswich pursue Curbs
Unless its a headline in an American paper in which case it should be - Ipswich pursues Curbs - as Americans seem to view a collective noun as singular.
If the sentence starts with his name it should be - Curbs's pursued by Ipswich
I think........0 -
"Curbs Curb's enthusiasm for Ipswich" would be correct would it not?0
-
[cite]Posted By: Leroy Ambrose[/cite]
Not really - since 'persued' isn't a real word.[cite]Posted By: Dazzler21[/cite]Would it not have to be "Curbs's persued by ipswich" as in "Curbs is"?
Apologies edited... Happy to admit my spelling fell short there!0 -
[cite]Posted By: Salad[/cite]
only if his nickname's "Curb", which it ain't[cite]Posted By: scruffle[/cite]however "Curb's pursued by Ipswich" now thats ok
Ok fair nuff
edit - "however Curbs's pursued by Ipswich" is correct grammer wise - just sounds stupid0 -
perhaps yung2000 will bore the s~~t out of everyone on the Ipswich site now0
-
On Netaddicks there used to be a poster called The Apostropher Royal - is that one of you lot?!0
-
[cite]Posted By: scruffle[/cite][cite]Posted By: Salad[/cite]
only if his nickname's "Curb", which it ain't[cite]Posted By: scruffle[/cite]however "Curb's pursued by Ipswich" now thats ok
Ok fair nuff
edit - "however Curbs's pursued by Ipswich" is correct grammer wise - just sounds stupid
so was i right, my spelling excepted?0 -
Ha ha...this really is very amusing...well done lads and lasses.
Or should that be lad's and lassies?0 -
Crown Woods...it would appear they are singularly better at grammar than sport...we(Catford Boys that is), used to 'thrash' them at everything!
Oh and scruffle...by the way.....it's grammar not grammer.
You gotta laugh folks...we could be here all day at this rate!0 -
[cite]Posted By: Dazzler21[/cite][cite]Posted By: scruffle[/cite][cite]Posted By: Salad[/cite]
only if his nickname's "Curb", which it ain't[cite]Posted By: scruffle[/cite]however "Curb's pursued by Ipswich" now thats ok
Ok fair nuff
edit - "however Curbs's pursued by Ipswich" is correct grammer wise - just sounds stupid
so was i right, my spelling excepted?
Well, actually Dazzler ......logically it should be "Curbs's pursued by, etc" ...., but grammatically the second S should be dropped
= "...Curbs' pursued by, etc....."
Which reads as Curbs pursued by Ipswich .... which is where we came in, of course!
) 0










