Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
PSA Blood Test results...
Comments
-
Not strictly true. Next step after high PSA reading, given such a reason could be a number of triggers, was a course of tablets to attempt to reduce the PSA reading; then the biopsyJamesSeed said:
In the days before MRI scans were offered prior to any treatment, the next step after a high reading, would normally be a biopsy. The biopsy procedure can lead to unpleasant side effects. Best to look those up online.AddicksAddict said:
@HardyAddick The PSA test is very accurate at measuring the level of prostate-specific antigen. However, if you have a high result, it doesn't tell you what's causing that result so you would then need to have further investigations, probably beginning with an MRI.HardyAddick said:Never had a psa test. How accurate are they as in past had 2 conflicting views as to whether to have one.
Unless you're totally phobic about needles, the test is a doddle so I'd strongly advise you to get a test done. If you are totally phobic about needles, close your eyes and get a test done.
Re "had 2 conflicting views", I'd be interested in what the "don't have the test" arguments were.0 -
It may have been the side effects that were mentioned negatively. Anyway, booked in to see doctor.1
-
True enough, but my sister in law was a GP up north, and I know this happened sometimes, especially with a very high reading. We talked about it when I had my high reading.PeterGage said:
Not strictly true. Next step after high PSA reading, given such a reason could be a number of triggers, was a course of tablets to attempt to reduce the PSA reading; then the biopsyJamesSeed said:
In the days before MRI scans were offered prior to any treatment, the next step after a high reading, would normally be a biopsy. The biopsy procedure can lead to unpleasant side effects. Best to look those up online.AddicksAddict said:
@HardyAddick The PSA test is very accurate at measuring the level of prostate-specific antigen. However, if you have a high result, it doesn't tell you what's causing that result so you would then need to have further investigations, probably beginning with an MRI.HardyAddick said:Never had a psa test. How accurate are they as in past had 2 conflicting views as to whether to have one.
Unless you're totally phobic about needles, the test is a doddle so I'd strongly advise you to get a test done. If you are totally phobic about needles, close your eyes and get a test done.
Re "had 2 conflicting views", I'd be interested in what the "don't have the test" arguments were.0 -
Dont want to labour the point, but I have gone through the whole process and I was given a course of tablets to attempt to reduce my high PSA level (14). My PSA level did not reduce and the next step was a biopsy.JamesSeed said:
True enough, but my sister in law was a GP up north, and I know this happened sometimes, especially with a very high reading. We talked about it when I had my high reading.PeterGage said:
Not strictly true. Next step after high PSA reading, given such a reason could be a number of triggers, was a course of tablets to attempt to reduce the PSA reading; then the biopsyJamesSeed said:
In the days before MRI scans were offered prior to any treatment, the next step after a high reading, would normally be a biopsy. The biopsy procedure can lead to unpleasant side effects. Best to look those up online.AddicksAddict said:
@HardyAddick The PSA test is very accurate at measuring the level of prostate-specific antigen. However, if you have a high result, it doesn't tell you what's causing that result so you would then need to have further investigations, probably beginning with an MRI.HardyAddick said:Never had a psa test. How accurate are they as in past had 2 conflicting views as to whether to have one.
Unless you're totally phobic about needles, the test is a doddle so I'd strongly advise you to get a test done. If you are totally phobic about needles, close your eyes and get a test done.
Re "had 2 conflicting views", I'd be interested in what the "don't have the test" arguments were.0 -
As one of the unlucky 13,I am now due to see consultant 4th July.Last year i also got a red with 7.9 but this came down to 6.6 after 2 more tests,i had mri scan, agreed to a biopsy(reluctantly ) but heard no more from hospital.It was only because of the convenence that I had the test done again on easter monday and was a bit shocked it came back at 10.3.not panicking yet,but anyone who has doubts about getting this test done should really overcome them and get it done.0
-
All the very best. If it is of any comfort, my first reading was 14 and after a few months of treatment (biopsy and radiotheraphy), I am now fine (5 years later). Latest reading was 0.8thickandthin63 said:As one of the unlucky 13,I am now due to see consultant 4th July.Last year i also got a red with 7.9 but this came down to 6.6 after 2 more tests,i had mri scan, agreed to a biopsy(reluctantly ) but heard no more from hospital.It was only because of the convenence that I had the test done again on easter monday and was a bit shocked it came back at 10.3.not panicking yet,but anyone who has doubts about getting this test done should really overcome them and get it done.5 -
Good news Peter!PeterGage said:
All the very best. If it is of any comfort, my first reading was 14 and after a few months of treatment (biopsy and radiotheraphy), I am now fine (5 years later). Latest reading was 0.8thickandthin63 said:As one of the unlucky 13,I am now due to see consultant 4th July.Last year i also got a red with 7.9 but this came down to 6.6 after 2 more tests,i had mri scan, agreed to a biopsy(reluctantly ) but heard no more from hospital.It was only because of the convenence that I had the test done again on easter monday and was a bit shocked it came back at 10.3.not panicking yet,but anyone who has doubts about getting this test done should really overcome them and get it done.1 -
OK. Fortunately we have MRI so now there’s no need not have the test.JamesSeed said:
In the days before MRI scans were offered prior to any treatment, the next step after a high reading, would normally be a biopsy. The biopsy procedure can lead to unpleasant side effects. Best to look those up online.AddicksAddict said:
@HardyAddick The PSA test is very accurate at measuring the level of prostate-specific antigen. However, if you have a high result, it doesn't tell you what's causing that result so you would then need to have further investigations, probably beginning with an MRI.HardyAddick said:Never had a psa test. How accurate are they as in past had 2 conflicting views as to whether to have one.
Unless you're totally phobic about needles, the test is a doddle so I'd strongly advise you to get a test done. If you are totally phobic about needles, close your eyes and get a test done.
Re "had 2 conflicting views", I'd be interested in what the "don't have the test" arguments were.0 -
BBC news today...there is a trial going on in London to replace a PSA test with an MRI scan, which it is claimed to be cheaper, quicker and more efficient.1
-
I decided I should have the PSA test, due to CAFC raising awareness.
I had the blood test Tuesday & got the result today.
The speed of receiving the result was much quicker than the angst of waiting weeks via CAFC.
Anyway, I was 2.2 so all ok.
Best wishes to everyone with ongoing issues.
2



