Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Fulham v Charlton - Saturday 5th October 2019 - Post-Match Thread

1246711

Comments

  • What a performance,4 points from these 3 games is immense.For the neutral,that was entertainment of the highest quality,I have not seen premiership games as entertaining as some of the Championship games played this week,Leeds -WBA as a blinder,our games have been a joy to watch,I hope the exposure on TV convinces people that there is life outside of the pampered peacocks in the top league.
  • lordromford
    lordromford Posts: 7,812
    seth plum said:
    Technically Mitrovic was offside initially.

    Chris_from_Sidcup said:
    Yes Mitrovic was slightly offside.
    “Technically offside”
    ”Slightly offside”

    I’m not really sure why people are downplaying this.
    I know the result was a good one in context and both Seth and Chris made great points in their posts, but the goal was purely and simply offside. “Technically” and “Slightly” don’t come into it.

    Apologies for coming across as a bit obsessed...  :#
  • seth plum
    seth plum Posts: 53,448
    I suppose I accept that it was indeed offside, and VAR would have ruled it out, but the officials were unable to see it, it was a very tight one.
  • Talal
    Talal Posts: 11,500
    I don't think it was even that tight, Mitrovic was clearly ahead of Sarr and the lino was looking straight across at it. 
  • ross1
    ross1 Posts: 51,006
    I am glad I am not a Fulham fan watching Sky........Minto interviewing LB, Taylor and Chris Powell. I love it
  • mendonca
    mendonca Posts: 9,415
    Mitrovic is a dirty lump too. 
  • ross1
    ross1 Posts: 51,006
    mendonca said:
    Mitrovic is a dirty lump too. 
    Yes, but I would like him in our squad
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,751
    Stroud should have sent off Mitrovic for two yellows and goal was as clear an offside as you can get. Add to that 7 mins additional time with over 8 played and you have to ask serious questions of the officials who cost us 2 points today.
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,751
    seth plum said:
    Technically Mitrovic was offside initially.

    Chris_from_Sidcup said:
    Yes Mitrovic was slightly offside.
    “Technically offside”
    ”Slightly offside”

    I’m not really sure why people are downplaying this.
    I know the result was a good one in context and both Seth and Chris made great points in their posts, but the goal was purely and simply offside. “Technically” and “Slightly” don’t come into it.

    Apologies for coming across as a bit obsessed...  :#
    He was a mile offside - slightly offside - are you having a laugh? David Blunkett, Stevie Wonder and Ray Charles would all have seen that one!
  • Valiantphil
    Valiantphil Posts: 6,411
    Phillips MOM but Pratley was superb too. 

  • Sponsored links:



  • mendonca
    mendonca Posts: 9,415
    Who we want in our squad is irrelevant when reviewing an individual game. He should have been sent off. 
  • The_President
    The_President Posts: 14,280
    CafcCrazy said:
    Phillips take a bow son. That’s a way to silence the critics.
    Does he have any ?

    Brilliant performance from him today - even my SA mate said, wow he is one hell of a keeper - i told him he will be in England team in 3 years !
  • ross1
    ross1 Posts: 51,006
    Stroud should have sent off Mitrovic for two yellows and goal was as clear an offside as you can get. Add to that 7 mins additional time with over 8 played and you have to ask serious questions of the officials who cost us 2 points today.
    Another injury within injury time added that minute
  • Oggy Red
    Oggy Red Posts: 44,962
    Love Bowyer's school uniform jumper. Better than Parky's.


  • soapboxsam
    soapboxsam Posts: 23,232
    mendonca said:
    Sarr should have wiped him out. Especially as it was outside the area and he wasnt the last man. He doesn't convince me still. 
    Agree Naby should've fouled him outside the box, but so much praise to everybody  from Bowyer, JJ, coaching staff and all the fans. To take 4 points from 3 teams who were all tipped to finish in top 6 was an immense effort especially with 6 players injured and our top man Lyle still out.

    Makes you proud.
  • Had a skinful, but good God, as a 'dirty northern bastard' I do love this club. Great atmosphere and company. Charlton till I die. 
  • Bryan should have had two yellows yet Gallagher got one for an incident that wasn't even a foul. Mitrovik was fouling defenders every time the ball came near the box but only got one yellow. And was offside. How is Stroud reffing at this level?
  • MuttleyCAFC
    MuttleyCAFC Posts: 47,751
    mendonca said:
    Sarr should have wiped him out. Especially as it was outside the area and he wasnt the last man. He doesn't convince me still. 
    Agree Naby should've fouled him outside the box, but so much praise to everybody  from Bowyer, JJ, coaching staff and all the fans. To take 4 points from 3 teams who were all tipped to finish in top 6 was an immense effort especially with 6 players injured and our top man Lyle still out.

    Makes you proud.
    As Mitrovic showed earlier, Naby could have kicked his legs away and not even got a booking from that clown Stroud.
  • Off_it
    Off_it Posts: 28,899
    seth plum said:
    Technically Mitrovic was offside initially.

    Chris_from_Sidcup said:
    Yes Mitrovic was slightly offside.
    “Technically offside”
    ”Slightly offside”

    I’m not really sure why people are downplaying this.
    I know the result was a good one in context and both Seth and Chris made great points in their posts, but the goal was purely and simply offside. “Technically” and “Slightly” don’t come into it.

    Apologies for coming across as a bit obsessed...  :#
    I would say that, technically, you were slightly obsessed.

  • Sponsored links:



  • lordromford
    lordromford Posts: 7,812
    Off_it said:
    seth plum said:
    Technically Mitrovic was offside initially.

    Chris_from_Sidcup said:
    Yes Mitrovic was slightly offside.
    “Technically offside”
    ”Slightly offside”

    I’m not really sure why people are downplaying this.
    I know the result was a good one in context and both Seth and Chris made great points in their posts, but the goal was purely and simply offside. “Technically” and “Slightly” don’t come into it.

    Apologies for coming across as a bit obsessed...  :#
    I would say that, technically, you were slightly obsessed.
     :D 
  • Phil
    Phil Posts: 613
    Another fantastic performance against a virtual Prem that had 24 hours more recovery time from their previous game.
    Awful ref helped them too letting consistent nasty fouls go unpunished even those committed right under his nose!
    Bonne did very well and would definitely benefit from a more physical striker to partner him.
    However, all in all a great week after playing 3 top teams.
  • Search 'Lee Bowyer' on twitter and the comments are split 50/50 between giving him massive credit for the result and taking the piss out of his "maths teacher" jumper.
    Could be worse, he could have pads on his elbows and be a geography teacher.
  • SoundAsa£
    SoundAsa£ Posts: 22,495
    If RD had any sense, he would be extending Bows contract right now.

    Also, the Sky commentator reckons a new buyer for the club has come forward, and Roland is looking for £50m.
    £50m. F*****g lunatic.
    Not meaning to be picky EveshamAddick, but the price mentioned by the Sky commentator was actually  “in the region of £50,000,000”.
  • Chippycafc
    Chippycafc Posts: 14,161
    Predicted 3-0.....for once glad I was wrong... Been in new forest all day and had no access to a TV....... Well done sounds like boys were up for it.... 
  • Talal
    Talal Posts: 11,500
    If RD had any sense, he would be extending Bows contract right now.

    Also, the Sky commentator reckons a new buyer for the club has come forward, and Roland is looking for £50m.
    £50m. F*****g lunatic.
    Not meaning to be picky EveshamAddick, but the price mentioned by the Sky commentator was actually  “in the region of £50,000,000”.
    That is quite picky. 
  • ross1
    ross1 Posts: 51,006

    What a game thanks to the travelling fans, unreal support yet again



  • KBslittlesis
    KBslittlesis Posts: 8,623
    What an outstanding performance from the boys and our fans.
    And I got to see Minto, SCP & Lyle on my telebox.

    Wonderful start to the weekend.

    :smiley:
  • Vincenzo
    Vincenzo Posts: 2,911
    seth plum said:
    Technically Mitrovic was offside initially.

    Chris_from_Sidcup said:
    Yes Mitrovic was slightly offside.
    “Technically offside”
    ”Slightly offside”

    I’m not really sure why people are downplaying this.
    I know the result was a good one in context and both Seth and Chris made great points in their posts, but the goal was purely and simply offside. “Technically” and “Slightly” don’t come into it.

    Apologies for coming across as a bit obsessed...  :#
    You're quite right. It was offside. You either are or you're not.

    He was.