The Takeover Thread - Duchatelet Finally Sells (Jan 2020)
Comments
-
Callumcafc said:The above raises an important question now Roland’s gone... what is our position on tango man?
If anyone made millions in their 20's they would become a giant egotistical cock. This happened to SJ. Listening to him in recent times the middle aged version is a chasten man who has been on the side of Charlton fans who wanted rid of Duchâtelet.
Acquired wisdom is allowed even for the tango man. He was superb last month when he was discussing ownership with Joe Cole and Jake Humphrey's. Definitely a man who has matured and has learnt more from his failures than his early successes.
59 -
Elthamaddick said:Callumcafc said:The above raises an important question now Roland’s gone... what is our position on tango man?28
-
Palace away years ago I recorded the Charlton fans singing Simon Jordan is a wanker is a wanker is a wanker is a wanker.
Has he gone up in my estimation. I suppose he has .
That's still my favourite ring tone though.3 -
You wait, if we become competitive again, he'll be the first to slag us off1
-
My only question, and excuse my probable ignorance, but why does a sheikh who has no interest in Charlton want to buy us? Is there some sort of tax break? Or is it just purely the ego trip of owning a London club?3
-
soapboxsam said:Callumcafc said:The above raises an important question now Roland’s gone... what is our position on tango man?
If anyone made millions in their 20's they would become a giant egotistical cock. This happened to SJ. Listening to him in recent times the middle aged version is a chasten man who has been on the side of Charlton fans who wanted rid of Duchâtelet.
Acquired wisdom is allowed even for the tango man. He was superb last month when he was discussing ownership with Joe Cole and Jake Humphrey's. Definitely a man who has matured and has learnt more from his failures than his early successes.22 -
Valley11 said:My only question, and excuse my probable ignorance, but why does a sheikh who has no interest in Charlton want to buy us? Is there some sort of tax break? Or is it just purely the ego trip of owning a London club?3
-
Valley11 said:My only question, and excuse my probable ignorance, but why does a sheikh who has no interest in Charlton want to buy us? Is there some sort of tax break? Or is it just purely the ego trip of owning a London club?
0 -
Callumcafc said:The above raises an important question now Roland’s gone... what is our position on tango man?1
-
Slowly warming to him often talks sense these days I must admit.
1 - Sponsored links:
-
Valley11 said:My only question, and excuse my probable ignorance, but why does a sheikh who has no interest in Charlton want to buy us? Is there some sort of tax break? Or is it just purely the ego trip of owning a London club?3
-
Valley11 said:My only question, and excuse my probable ignorance, but why does a sheikh who has no interest in Charlton want to buy us? Is there some sort of tax break? Or is it just purely the ego trip of owning a London club?12
-
ShootersHillGuru said:Valley11 said:My only question, and excuse my probable ignorance, but why does a sheikh who has no interest in Charlton want to buy us? Is there some sort of tax break? Or is it just purely the ego trip of owning a London club?0
-
The Red Robin said:ShootersHillGuru said:Valley11 said:My only question, and excuse my probable ignorance, but why does a sheikh who has no interest in Charlton want to buy us? Is there some sort of tax break? Or is it just purely the ego trip of owning a London club?0
-
Valley11 said:My only question, and excuse my probable ignorance, but why does a sheikh who has no interest in Charlton want to buy us? Is there some sort of tax break? Or is it just purely the ego trip of owning a London club?20
-
Athletico Charlton said:Valley11 said:My only question, and excuse my probable ignorance, but why does a sheikh who has no interest in Charlton want to buy us? Is there some sort of tax break? Or is it just purely the ego trip of owning a London club?4
-
Athletico Charlton said:Valley11 said:My only question, and excuse my probable ignorance, but why does a sheikh who has no interest in Charlton want to buy us? Is there some sort of tax break? Or is it just purely the ego trip of owning a London club?5
-
I used to be of an opinion that I wouldn’t pi55 on him if he was on fire, now I would! 😉16
-
Very pleased RD is going, obviously. But it’s early days yet and don’t want to get too excited by billionaire owners. The name of the new owners is East Street Investments. You normally invest with the aim of increasing the value of your investment and at some point taking your profits. I think we should see how it all pans out over the next 3-6 months. The January window will be the first indicator of intention and if they make some sort of statement of their goals and objectives. We’ve been here before - the spivs with a cash in plan by moving to the Peninsula and Duchatelet with his experiment. Both their own agendas. Both looked OK early on...so only time will tell IMO.2
-
Five year plan would be sensible. Any longer and the financial commitments start to become questionable. The equation is investing enough to achieve reaching the PL which would be considerable against the risk of failure. The real key for me assuming the above is the plan, is having the right manager. At this point everything points to Bowyer being the right man but he will have a great weight of expectation now. Championship survival is essential so I expect to see investment in January that we are not used to.2
- Sponsored links:
-
bobmunro said:Callumcafc said:The above raises an important question now Roland’s gone... what is our position on tango man?
That aside he is, and always will be, a stripey, two watch, tango tosser.5 -
Athletico Charlton said:Valley11 said:My only question, and excuse my probable ignorance, but why does a sheikh who has no interest in Charlton want to buy us? Is there some sort of tax break? Or is it just purely the ego trip of owning a London club?0
-
40000 can be achieved at the valley just by adding to what we have - that’s more than big enough in the short to mid term and I’m sure the whole valley site could go way bigger than that if we were to start re doing what we currently have - planning permitting0
-
DOUCHER said:40000 can be achieved at the valley just by adding to what we have - that’s more than big enough in the short to mid term and I’m sure the whole valley site could go way bigger than that if we were to start re doing what we currently have - planning permitting0
-
That would be the only downer for me - a move from the valley but I don’t see it’s necessary or likely - I’d be happy with an increase in season ticket prices - no probs with that - I’m willing to pay the going rate0
-
DOUCHER said:That would be the only downer for me - a move from the valley but I don’t see it’s necessary or likely - I’d be happy with an increase in season ticket prices - no probs with that - I’m willing to pay the going rate0
-
East St is the clue
Buy up the rest of the low value industrial units in and around East(moor) St (bought 75% already) and build the new stadium there while the Valley gets a 4g pitch and becomes the U23/women's/community stadium.
Jimmy Seed stand demolished to house the Community Trust and the new museum. That's what they told the museum so we'd agree to give up our 99 year lease.
The new jubilee line extension from North Greenwich to Woolwich would have a stop at Charlton. London underground want it called Thames Barrier, new owners want it called Charlton Athletic. Expect a comprimise Charlton Riverside.15 -
bobmunro said:How comes you got to see the five-year plan first?Solidgone said:It becomes boring after awhile. 😉
hey, I have spent 4-5 years of RDs tenure dreaming of what could be!0 -
Valley27000 said:DOUCHER said:That would be the only downer for me - a move from the valley but I don’t see it’s necessary or likely - I’d be happy with an increase in season ticket prices - no probs with that - I’m willing to pay the going rate1
-
ShootersHillGuru said:From the second article:
"It depends on the individual and the organisation and the resources they have. The riches of Sheikh Mansour mean there is a risk that every Middle East investor is going to be seen through a similar lens, but there is a spectrum, and Portsmouth's experience with Sulaiman al-Fahim lies at the opposite end, with most other investors somewhere in between.
Whether Manchester City face serious sanctions for allegedly breaching financial fair play regulations may tell us a lot about the penalties for rule-breaking, but there can only be one Premier League winner each year and Sheikh Mansour has set the bar so high that almost every other investor is likely to fall short."
Lots of assumptions from some about the amount that's going to be spent. We still don't know who's ultimately funding this takeover, or how much they're planning to invest.
Probably better to reign in expectations to avoid potential disappointment, at least until more is known (I know, where's the fun in that?).
All that matters at the moment is that Roland's (almost) gone, and he's never coming back.
12