Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

From the OS Messages..

adamtheaddick
adamtheaddick Posts: 8,664
edited January 2009 in General Charlton
Link..




Splitter... ;-)

3711459_std.jpg

Comments

  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,460
    I can see a sub off the starboard bow, Captain. Torpedo tracks in the water at 1000 yards.
  • 4375_5080524237.jpg

    No Chance... ;-)
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,460
    http://www.charltonlife.com/forum/comments.php?DiscussionID=22673&page=1#Item_30
  • thats on here H, the fact is it went on the OS first, no loyailty some people...
  • Henry Irving
    Henry Irving Posts: 85,460
    [cite]Posted By: adamtheaddick[/cite]thats on here H, the fact is it went on the OS first, no loyailty some people...

    I know cos Dave said he's posted it on both which is why you didn't need to post it again. : - )
  • christ ben... nevermind i will Kamikaze this one myself then...

    kamikaze.jpg



    :-)
  • Dave Rudd
    Dave Rudd Posts: 2,887
    Definitely went here first ......... not by much, but definitely here first.
  • Cheers dave was just having a bit of banter with Ben, no offence Dave. just its says 4 days ago on here. and the post on the OS was the 7th, so would have been a day before, to be honest i check the OS message service for the Legend that is Jonathan Ackworth if you have come across him in your travels..
  • Dave Rudd
    Dave Rudd Posts: 2,887
    It actually went into a different thread first, I think. I wanted to ensure wide coverage, hence my scatter-gun approach.

    Ah, Ackworth .....

    Now there is a legend.
  • AFKABartram
    AFKABartram Posts: 58,124
    Dave, i'm sure you said you were waiting for Waggy's permission to produce the email, and then when you did, you 'summised' what he replied, rather than replicate. Was there any reason for that ?

  • Sponsored links:



  • Dave Rudd
    Dave Rudd Posts: 2,887
    [cite]Posted By: AFKABartram[/cite]Dave, i'm sure you said you were waiting for Waggy's permission to produce the email, and then when you did, you 'summised' what he replied, rather than replicate. Was there any reason for that ?

    Nothing sinister in the word 'summarised', AFKA. I simply consolidated my original e-mail and Steve Waggott's reply into one posting. In doing so, I took the liberty of making a few minor editorial changes (although the mis-spelling of 'Chapple' still got through). Steve had referred to the amount of personal money which the Directors had put in last year and, because this exchange pre-dated the official publication of financial details, I chose to remove this piece of detail.

    Apart from that, the whole thing was pretty much a 'cut and paste' exercise.

    Hope that helps.
  • AFKABartram
    AFKABartram Posts: 58,124
    cheers