Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)
Comments
-
Would you say that if it was neck on the line?Talal said:
Seems ridiculous the number of times you can appeal. You've lost twice but have another go.ForeverAddickted said:
Yeah they can... I guess they'll have to arrange something with Pearce to request another injunction whilst they go to the Supreme CourtLeeds_Addick said:
I think someone suggested they can go to the supreme courtChunes said:IF (big if) we did win, can LD apply for yet another temporary injunction and another appeal?
Means that if TS is doing a deal with ESI then he'll have a window (however slim) for the EFL to approve him and get it done0 -
NLA et al might coincidently be in Preston?ForeverAddickted said:NLA has tweeted reminding people that EFL's board meetings are on Thursdays...4 -
If they lose this, Elliott will write to Watchdog1
-
Could well be going by the F4F comments yesterdaySolidgone said:
NLA et al might coincidently be in Preston?ForeverAddickted said:NLA has tweeted reminding people that EFL's board meetings are on Thursdays...0 -
The higher you build your barriers...
12 -
Absolutely shitting it7
-
Back in five minutes apparently0
-
NLAForeverAddickted said:NLA has tweeted reminding people that EFL's board meetings are on Thursdays...
‘ Remember so far that after any negative news TS follows up with good news I’d wager if the injunction is upheld then we will hear the news we want soon after , don’t forget the EFL board meeting is thursdays’1 -
-
How could anyone trust anyone who wants to own Charlton 100% after all we’ve been through. I trust him 1%, which is 1% more than this rest of this cast of characters.eastterrace6168 said:
Surely you have got to trust TS 100% otherwise all is lost,hopefully heLeeds_Addick said:
If you 100% trust Sandgaard on that then nosillav nitram said:PWR
Sandgaard has always been confident of a deal regardless of todays outcome. So from that perspective, does it really matter what the Judges decide?
has a cunning plan up his sleeve!2 - Sponsored links:
-
They gave them 72 hours. Must still be 48 left.ForeverAddickted said:
Could well be going by the F4F comments yesterdaySolidgone said:
NLA et al might coincidently be in Preston?ForeverAddickted said:NLA has tweeted reminding people that EFL's board meetings are on Thursdays...0 -
Covered End said:
This must be favourite. Nothing else makes any sense.0 -
Not the only one!!MattF said:Absolutely shitting it1 -
Be happy if they freeze the proceeds and let ESI 1 and 2 fight about it at a later date11
-
Should have happened from the beginning!!i_b_b_o_r_g said:Be happy if they freeze the proceeds and let ESI 1 and 2 fight about it at a later date4 -
Has the second half kicked off yet?
0 -
We're back in court for the ruling. Then we can try to work out what it means for #cafc, which may be the difficult bit.1
-
It certainly seems to be the only sensible optionForeverAddickted said:
Should have happened from the beginning!!i_b_b_o_r_g said:Be happy if they freeze the proceeds and let ESI 1 and 2 fight about it at a later date0 -
9
- Sponsored links:
-
LJ Lewison giving the ruling. Says this is a case about #cafc.1
-
Get lost ESI 1 and 2.2
-
That’s a good start surely?5
-
PM has agreed to sell its shares in ESI to LD, he says. Elliott sole shareholder in LD. Says he has sufficient means up to £12. Parties in dispute as to whether SPA is extant. PM says it has been terminated or is incapable of performance.0
-
🤞🏻1
-
Crossing everything1
-
No new evidence was given. I can not see how we can loose this. I'm confident we have won0
-
WSS said:That’s a good start surely?
Charlton normally start well and end badlysaid:That’s a good start surely?18 -
Summary0
This discussion has been closed.
