Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
ESI 1 v ESI 2 - Initial Hearing 01-02/09/2020, Court of Appeal 17/09/2020 (p127)
Comments
-
Any difference between current price of £1 and value of subsequent sale easy to define. LD has offered personal guarantee of £50k. No direct evidence hat amount is inadequate.0
-
Well that's that then0
-
Panorama will only have themselves to blame. Fucking idiots.1
-
Game Over.0
-
Honestly it's absolutely baffling that they chose to leave out key evidence at the second time of asking.2
-
We’re about to find out what Thomas is made of.3
-
Lewison: What impressed previous judge was evidence of Mihail about potential consequences for the club itself.0
- Sponsored links:
-
Panorama have fucked it. Absolute bunch of cnuts.5
-
Transfer embargo remains.
Season fucked before it starts2 -
ESI that has not shown it was not able to finance the club sustainability. Quite unclear how grant or refusal of injunction would affect EFL sanctions.0
-
3 -
Can't they just say " Hanged by the neck until dead " , just like they do in the Westerns ?0
-
I feel sick1
-
Game over.0
- Sponsored links:
-
OMFG0
-
Little bit of hope with this commentCovered End said:0 -
This isn't ending well...0
-
Mihail's evidence depends on scenario that Elliott wins at trial and can't operate club. Should look at what happens if LD fails at trial. Difficult to see how Elliott can fall into relevant person category in that situation.0
-
Calm down you muppets. You’re not helping.7
-
Sounds grim clinging to the hope there’s a “but”... from judge dread2
-
The fuck is going on0
-
I don't get what most of this means but it doesn't look good0
-
they are going for money of sale kept separate and ESI 1 and 2 fight it out
3
This discussion has been closed.
