Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
January 2021 Transfer Targets (last minute swoop for Jaiyesimi p184 - NOW it's all over.)
Comments
-
Ferryman said:covered_end_junior said:sammy391 said:DOUCHER said:Callumcafc said:For the lack of announcements today I’m surprised at the lack of meltdown. Was expecting barrages of posts “where are they then????”
Wikipedia doesn't mean he has signed, anyone can edit that. I could edit the Pope to says he plays for us, doesn't mean he has
0 -
Managing to keep players fit, in the era of a salary cap is as important as signing new players it seems.0
-
jacob_CAFC said:Ferryman said:covered_end_junior said:sammy391 said:DOUCHER said:Callumcafc said:For the lack of announcements today I’m surprised at the lack of meltdown. Was expecting barrages of posts “where are they then????”
Wikipedia doesn't mean he has signed, anyone can edit that. I could edit the Pope to says he plays for us, doesn't mean he has6 -
Todds_right_hook said:jacob_CAFC said:Ferryman said:covered_end_junior said:sammy391 said:DOUCHER said:Callumcafc said:For the lack of announcements today I’m surprised at the lack of meltdown. Was expecting barrages of posts “where are they then????”
Wikipedia doesn't mean he has signed, anyone can edit that. I could edit the Pope to says he plays for us, doesn't mean he has9 -
jacob_CAFC said:Ferryman said:covered_end_junior said:sammy391 said:DOUCHER said:Callumcafc said:For the lack of announcements today I’m surprised at the lack of meltdown. Was expecting barrages of posts “where are they then????”
Wikipedia doesn't mean he has signed, anyone can edit that. I could edit the Pope to says he plays for us, doesn't mean he has2 -
jacob_CAFC said:Ferryman said:covered_end_junior said:sammy391 said:DOUCHER said:Callumcafc said:For the lack of announcements today I’m surprised at the lack of meltdown. Was expecting barrages of posts “where are they then????”
Wikipedia doesn't mean he has signed, anyone can edit that. I could edit the Pope to says he plays for us, doesn't mean he has0 -
Just noticed that we have seven matches this month. Gallen/Bowyer said we will get two at the start and a couple at the end. Hoping we will get the defender in ASAP as I don’t think we can wait until the end of the month with 21 points up for grabs before then.
0 -
Great window so far. We needed a better striker to put chances away and some pace injected into the side to replace Alfie. We've added that in at the first available opportunity, which is very unlike the Charlton of recent years. Time will tell if the players work out and how quickly Schwartz can get up to speed but on the face of it we've done exactly what we needed to do already. I feel like our defenders are good players, and they'll look a lot better than they have done recently once the pressure is lifted off them by our attacking play having more going for it
3 -
Garrymanilow said:Great window so far. We needed a better striker to put chances away and some pace injected into the side to replace Alfie. We've added that in at the first available opportunity, which is very unlike the Charlton of recent years. Time will tell if the players work out and how quickly Schwartz can get up to speed but on the face of it we've done exactly what we needed to do already. I feel like our defenders are good players, and they'll look a lot better than they have done recently once the pressure is lifted off them by our attacking play having more going for it7
-
4
- Sponsored links:
-
killerandflash said:15
-
thenewbie said:killerandflash said:14
-
jacob_CAFC said:Ferryman said:covered_end_junior said:sammy391 said:DOUCHER said:Callumcafc said:For the lack of announcements today I’m surprised at the lack of meltdown. Was expecting barrages of posts “where are they then????”
Wikipedia doesn't mean he has signed, anyone can edit that. I could edit the Pope to says he plays for us, doesn't mean he has0 -
Vfrf said:Garrymanilow said:Great window so far. We needed a better striker to put chances away and some pace injected into the side to replace Alfie. We've added that in at the first available opportunity, which is very unlike the Charlton of recent years. Time will tell if the players work out and how quickly Schwartz can get up to speed but on the face of it we've done exactly what we needed to do already. I feel like our defenders are good players, and they'll look a lot better than they have done recently once the pressure is lifted off them by our attacking play having more going for it
3 -
Garrymanilow said:Vfrf said:Garrymanilow said:Great window so far. We needed a better striker to put chances away and some pace injected into the side to replace Alfie. We've added that in at the first available opportunity, which is very unlike the Charlton of recent years. Time will tell if the players work out and how quickly Schwartz can get up to speed but on the face of it we've done exactly what we needed to do already. I feel like our defenders are good players, and they'll look a lot better than they have done recently once the pressure is lifted off them by our attacking play having more going for it
If you don't have that solid backline you end up with your attacking players having to drop very, very deep to retrieve the ball and then they're busting a gut to get forward. The only players I see capable right now of linking play are Williams who never plays and Maddison who rarely plays too. That's why we're SO much more effective with Innis/Famewo because they're confident and able enough to travel 20 yards forward and pick a pass, it also frees up the players in front of them to exploit space rather than having to cover, knowing that their centre-half's are most likely about to be beat.3 -
as mentioned yesterday, Innis is way ahead of schedule and is actually fir to play now but they don't want to risk him breaking down again so are holding off getting him involved again yet so its a bit of a dilemma - i'd say if we can offload oshalaja (who clearly isn't in LB's plans) then we get another in - i reckon they will see how Innis goes in a few weeks if can't offload oshalaja and decide then
10 -
DOUCHER said:as mentioned yesterday, Innis is way ahead of schedule and is actually fir to play now but they don't want to risk him breaking down again so are holding off getting him involved again yet so its a bit of a dilemma - i'd say if we can offload oshalaja (who clearly isn't in LB's plans) then we get another in - i reckon they will see how Innis goes in a few weeks if can't offload oshalaja and decide then
Cant blame the medical team for being cautious, they've been burnt so much these last twelve months
At some point though they do need to take the risk with a player though
Just because something happened a few years ago (under different ownership as well) doesnt mean it'll keep happening0 -
ForeverAddickted said:DOUCHER said:as mentioned yesterday, Innis is way ahead of schedule and is actually fir to play now but they don't want to risk him breaking down again so are holding off getting him involved again yet so its a bit of a dilemma - i'd say if we can offload oshalaja (who clearly isn't in LB's plans) then we get another in - i reckon they will see how Innis goes in a few weeks if can't offload oshalaja and decide then
Cant blame the medical team for being cautious, they've been burnt so much these last twelve months
At some point though they do need to take the risk with a player though
Just because something happened a few years ago (under different ownership as well) doesnt mean it'll keep happening
2 -
Todds_right_hook said:ForeverAddickted said:DOUCHER said:as mentioned yesterday, Innis is way ahead of schedule and is actually fir to play now but they don't want to risk him breaking down again so are holding off getting him involved again yet so its a bit of a dilemma - i'd say if we can offload oshalaja (who clearly isn't in LB's plans) then we get another in - i reckon they will see how Innis goes in a few weeks if can't offload oshalaja and decide then
Cant blame the medical team for being cautious, they've been burnt so much these last twelve months
At some point though they do need to take the risk with a player though
Just because something happened a few years ago (under different ownership as well) doesnt mean it'll keep happening0 -
Then Southeastern shut the door on his leg and he's out till May.30
- Sponsored links:
-
MattF said:Todds_right_hook said:ForeverAddickted said:DOUCHER said:as mentioned yesterday, Innis is way ahead of schedule and is actually fir to play now but they don't want to risk him breaking down again so are holding off getting him involved again yet so its a bit of a dilemma - i'd say if we can offload oshalaja (who clearly isn't in LB's plans) then we get another in - i reckon they will see how Innis goes in a few weeks if can't offload oshalaja and decide then
Cant blame the medical team for being cautious, they've been burnt so much these last twelve months
At some point though they do need to take the risk with a player though
Just because something happened a few years ago (under different ownership as well) doesnt mean it'll keep happening24 -
iaitch said:Then Southeastern shut the door on his leg and he's out till May.1
-
iaitch said:Then Southeastern shut the door on his leg and he's out till May.13
-
Good news about Innis. Lets hope his return to the first 11 is now as slow as Pearce and Osh's.0
-
Pleased with the business so far, but if we can get an *actual* centre back in as well, then I will feel much more confident about our prospects of going up this season.0
-
Todds_right_hook said:ForeverAddickted said:DOUCHER said:as mentioned yesterday, Innis is way ahead of schedule and is actually fir to play now but they don't want to risk him breaking down again so are holding off getting him involved again yet so its a bit of a dilemma - i'd say if we can offload oshalaja (who clearly isn't in LB's plans) then we get another in - i reckon they will see how Innis goes in a few weeks if can't offload oshalaja and decide then
Cant blame the medical team for being cautious, they've been burnt so much these last twelve months
At some point though they do need to take the risk with a player though
Just because something happened a few years ago (under different ownership as well) doesnt mean it'll keep happening
Did the poster spontaneously combust with excitement?8 -
I think the fella who had a photo with iniss was Brad hulyer , bradders the man in the van on twitter0
-
iaitch said:Then Southeastern shut the door on his leg and he's out till May.
ive promised myself to lay off him, I just can’t do it!!4 -
Addick Addict said:Oggy Red said:Addick Addict said:The standout aspect from the line ups of both sides yesterday was the average age of the respective sides - Hull's was 24 and ours nearer 29. They had 7 players 24 or younger whereas we had 2 including an 18 year old loanee. They didn't have a single player over 30 but we had 5 in that category. The average age of Lincoln's starting XI was 24 too with 7 of their side that age or under.
They are clearly building for the future and playing younger, fitter and faster players. We have signed and are playing a lot of bodies that are journeymen whose best years are behind them.
When we went up last time we had the likes of Fosu-Henry, Aribo, Bielik, Cullen, Grant, Dijksteel, Lapslie and even a few cameos from Morgan who were all 23 or under but who went on to make 216 appearances between them. And all six of the ones that have left us are now playing at a higher level - Lapslie is on his way too and yet LB thought he was good enough to make 27 appearances as a 21 year old but who isn't now.
Where are their equivalents this season? Yes we are missing Doughty but who is to say that he isn't going to go the same way as so many before him? Morgan is a reluctant starter for LB too. We also have a couple of young CBs out injured but, again, take a look at the positions that most of the players above played in - the engine room or up top.
For both the short and long term LB has to begin to balance the side. And the absence of Watson and Pratley gives him the chance to start to do that. I hope that he doesn't waste it by not playing the likes of Morgan or by signing yet another player or two with question marks about whether they retain any pace or ability. Or, for that matter, desire.
First of all you say that our average age was "nearer 29" ...... and of course, straight away we see Pearce (33) and Pratley (35) at CB.
Neither of those would be playing CB if it wasn't for the fact that Inniss (24) and Famewo (22) are both victim of long term injury.
I'm not going to count 30 year old Amos, because most sides like to include an experienced keeper - and really, pace isn't an issue with him.
Then there's Gunter (32) but he's quick enough. And Watson (35) who isn't - but he's now injured, so we won't see him for a while.
But our side, while missing Doughty (20) did include Morgan (21) and Maatsen (18).
We could/should also have started 24 year old Purrington at LB. 'Little' Smyth (23) is no geriatric either.
The rest of them sit in that 'player in his prime, 25-29' category. Can't see anything wrong with picking players who should be in their prime.
But as always it's the right combination that's needed. And we are right to question that.
The point I am trying to make is that Lincoln and Hull do not play one 35 year old let alone two - anywhere! They have 7 or 8 under 24 not a token one or two. They don't drop flair players who have been MOMs in the previous game for square ball merchants.
I doubt anybody can think of a period at any club where a different MOTM gets dropped in the next game in the space of a few games. Simply because it is ridiculous. It is ridiculous if you are a football manager, if you are a fan or even if you are a village idiot. It is a big reason for questioning what is wrong with Bowyer.3 -
Really hope we see Innis soon. He seems exactly the player we need to get us into a decent position again. obviously don't want to rush his return but do hope he is back in the red shirt shortly.14