Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
If Gomez leaves Liverpool January
DiscoCAFC
Posts: 1,762
If Gomez leaves January will we get a percentage of the sale? Or is Roland being cunning by getting that payment himself!
0
Comments
-
Surely all assets and liabilities outside of The Valley and Sparrows Lane sit with the club ie under Sandgaard's ownership and Duchatelet is now "only" landlord of those 2 prized assets.0
-
Can only come to us I believe! Newcastle anyone?!0
-
I believe Duchatalet sold the sell-on clause to Liverpool a while back for a quick buck didn't he?0
-
Cawley confirmed this was not the case.paulsturgess said:I believe Duchatalet sold the sell-on clause to Liverpool a while back for a quick buck didn't he?4 -
Although there was that tweet replying to Cawley suggesting that ESI sold it.
Cawley didnt reply, so hopefully he just couldn't be bothered to reply to something that wasn't the case1 -
Doesn't look like he'll make a permanent switch this season:
0 -
That Villa in the summer move makes a lot of sense0
-
Gomez & Konsa at RCB & LCB respectively
3 -
Sponsored links:
-
I believe I am right in saying that ESI were sniffing around this.DiscoCAFC said:If Gomez leaves January will we get a percentage of the sale? Or is Roland being cunning by getting that payment himself!
However, Chris Parkes got wind of it and somehow or another (with someone else’s assistance), managed to scupper or delay the bastards before the famous showdown at The Valley …….so it never happened, at least that’s according to what I’m hearing.
I strongly believe this to be the case.
5 -
I think you'll be overexaggering the fee of a player that has been injured more often than he has been fit since leaving us.
1 -
Has anyone suggested a fee?4
-
You've forgotten Shelvey running the midfield & Grant up front with Lookman.sam3110 said:
With Aribo playing in front of them, maybe they can put a cheeky couple of bids in for Pope in goal and Lookman out wideDazzler21 said:Gomez & Konsa at RCB & LCB respectively
Lord, we've sold some talent (mostly for peanuts) this last few years.3 -
It’s a bold move to get your negative spin in and bring the mood down to earth with a bump before anyone’s even said anything. 😉SELR_addicks said:I think you'll be overexaggering the fee of a player that has been injured more often than he has been fit since leaving us.4 -
Am I wrong? I can't see a team willing to buy him for a fee he would command when his injury record is as poor as it is.lordromford said:
It’s a bold move to get your negative spin in and bring the mood down to earth with a bump before anyone’s even said anything. 😉SELR_addicks said:I think you'll be overexaggering the fee of a player that has been injured more often than he has been fit since leaving us.0 -
Very wrong.SELR_addicks said:
Am I wrong? I can't see a team willing to buy him for a fee he would command when his injury record is as poor as it is.lordromford said:
It’s a bold move to get your negative spin in and bring the mood down to earth with a bump before anyone’s even said anything. 😉SELR_addicks said:I think you'll be overexaggering the fee of a player that has been injured more often than he has been fit since leaving us.
A player Liverpool aren't keen to lose and Real Madrid are keeping tabs on won't be going for peanuts.3 -
sell on clauses are usually a % of any profit so talking about us seeing any money is suggesting that he'll be going for quite a substantial amountDazzler21 said:Has anyone suggested a fee?
2 -
I refer you to @Dazzler21 ‘s question:SELR_addicks said:
Am I wrong? I can't see a team willing to buy him for a fee he would command when his injury record is as poor as it is.lordromford said:
It’s a bold move to get your negative spin in and bring the mood down to earth with a bump before anyone’s even said anything. 😉SELR_addicks said:I think you'll be overexaggering the fee of a player that has been injured more often than he has been fit since leaving us.
So once people start suggesting fees, then we can start analysing whether you’re right or wrong. Which was the point I was making. Obviously.Dazzler21 said:Has anyone suggested a fee?
😉0 -
Caring about the sell on fee implies people are expecting a decent sum for it.lordromford said:
I refer you to @Dazzler21 ‘s question:SELR_addicks said:
Am I wrong? I can't see a team willing to buy him for a fee he would command when his injury record is as poor as it is.lordromford said:
It’s a bold move to get your negative spin in and bring the mood down to earth with a bump before anyone’s even said anything. 😉SELR_addicks said:I think you'll be overexaggering the fee of a player that has been injured more often than he has been fit since leaving us.
So once people start suggesting fees, then we can start analysing whether you’re right or wrong. Which was the point I was making. Obviously.Dazzler21 said:Has anyone suggested a fee?
😉
The player has played 14 minutes of football this season in the Premier League, and that's without injuries.2 -
Sponsored links:
-
Let’s hope they can sell him to Newcastle , they are the premier league equivalent of Ipswich and are rumoured to be signing about 300 players!1
-
Having said that, he looks to be out of contract at the end of this season?Belv said:
Very wrong.SELR_addicks said:
Am I wrong? I can't see a team willing to buy him for a fee he would command when his injury record is as poor as it is.lordromford said:
It’s a bold move to get your negative spin in and bring the mood down to earth with a bump before anyone’s even said anything. 😉SELR_addicks said:I think you'll be overexaggering the fee of a player that has been injured more often than he has been fit since leaving us.
A player Liverpool aren't keen to lose and Real Madrid are keeping tabs on won't be going for peanuts.
EDIT: Scrap that, I was looking at old news. He's contracted until 2024.0 -
Contracted till 2024.Belv said:
Having said that, he looks to be out of contract at the end of this season?Belv said:
Very wrong.SELR_addicks said:
Am I wrong? I can't see a team willing to buy him for a fee he would command when his injury record is as poor as it is.lordromford said:
It’s a bold move to get your negative spin in and bring the mood down to earth with a bump before anyone’s even said anything. 😉SELR_addicks said:I think you'll be overexaggering the fee of a player that has been injured more often than he has been fit since leaving us.
A player Liverpool aren't keen to lose and Real Madrid are keeping tabs on won't be going for peanuts.
https://www.skysports.com/football/news/11669/11576952/joe-gomez-extends-liverpool-contract-until-2024
1 -
A fully fit Gomez would probably command a fee of roughly £50m, English, capped and has won both the Premier League and Champions League - With his injuries I'd still expect Liverpool to want £15-20m at the extreme least for him.
If we've got 10% sell on (I've got a feeling thats at the very least) then £1.5-2m would do wonders for us.5 -
I’m not arguing that. I thought that was obvious. Never mind, forget it. 🙄SELR_addicks said:
Caring about the sell on fee implies people are expecting a decent sum for it.lordromford said:
I refer you to @Dazzler21 ‘s question:SELR_addicks said:
Am I wrong? I can't see a team willing to buy him for a fee he would command when his injury record is as poor as it is.lordromford said:
It’s a bold move to get your negative spin in and bring the mood down to earth with a bump before anyone’s even said anything. 😉SELR_addicks said:I think you'll be overexaggering the fee of a player that has been injured more often than he has been fit since leaving us.
So once people start suggesting fees, then we can start analysing whether you’re right or wrong. Which was the point I was making. Obviously.Dazzler21 said:Has anyone suggested a fee?
😉
The player has played 14 minutes of football this season in the Premier League, and that's without injuries.
0 -
Taylor up top as well - after 72 minsFortune 82nd Minute said:
You've forgotten Shelvey running the midfield & Grant up front with Lookman.sam3110 said:
With Aribo playing in front of them, maybe they can put a cheeky couple of bids in for Pope in goal and Lookman out wideDazzler21 said:Gomez & Konsa at RCB & LCB respectively
Lord, we've sold some talent (mostly for peanuts) this last few years.3 -
It wouldn’t surprise me if it’s edging towards the 20-30% range. They only got him for £3.5m so I hope we asked for a more generous sell on.ForeverAddickted said:A fully fit Gomez would probably command a fee of roughly £50m, English, capped and has won both the Premier League and Champions League - With his injuries I'd still expect Liverpool to want £15-20m at the extreme least for him.
If we've got 10% sell on (I've got a feeling thats at the very least) then £1.5-2m would do wonders for us.2 -
Be surprised if that isnt on their minds too...ElliotCAFC said:
It wouldn’t surprise me if it’s edging towards the 20-30% range. They only got him for £3.5m so I hope we asked for a more generous sell on.ForeverAddickted said:A fully fit Gomez would probably command a fee of roughly £50m, English, capped and has won both the Premier League and Champions League - With his injuries I'd still expect Liverpool to want £15-20m at the extreme least for him.
If we've got 10% sell on (I've got a feeling thats at the very least) then £1.5-2m would do wonders for us.
If we've got a 30% sell on and they sell him for £20m, well they're only getting £14m from that0 -
£50m for a fully fit Gomez would be an absolute steal (think Harry Maguire!!!).
His trouble at the moment is his injury record, when fit he's a Rolls Royce of a player4 -
It would be £15.05m.ForeverAddickted said:
Be surprised if that isnt on their minds too...ElliotCAFC said:
It wouldn’t surprise me if it’s edging towards the 20-30% range. They only got him for £3.5m so I hope we asked for a more generous sell on.ForeverAddickted said:A fully fit Gomez would probably command a fee of roughly £50m, English, capped and has won both the Premier League and Champions League - With his injuries I'd still expect Liverpool to want £15-20m at the extreme least for him.
If we've got 10% sell on (I've got a feeling thats at the very least) then £1.5-2m would do wonders for us.
If we've got a 30% sell on and they sell him for £20m, well they're only getting £14m from that0
