Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Homophobic abuse at today's game (ed - Not Charlton fans)
Comments
-
Greenhithe said:I sang shit songs as a youth and older. I have invaded pitches. Especially when they gave Arsenal the Arthur Wait and it was raining at Selhurst. And have always accepted swearing and horrible goading of the opposition as part of the package. As for the homophobic abuse I don’t understand the uproar. Get over it, the people singing it are pissed and don’t mean it or are idiots to be pitied. My 2 gay daughters wouldn’t give a shit.
the McCarthyite witch hunt of anyone who doesn’t fit the current template (which by the way I agree with is the right way to be) annoys me.
I do not agree with what you say but will defend with my life your right to say it. I reckon1 -
ElliotCAFC said:Lordflashheart said:oohaahmortimer said:Lordflashheart said:There was a Policeman in the away end openly videoing our fans - I couldn’t believe how stupid some of the people around me were openly chanting homophobic abuse, and abuse at their goalkeeper, and the Policeman simply stood there and filmed them - they could see he was filming them, but carried on - idiots
Sad times whatever pricks behaved like this .For the record, I’m not saying it isn’t acceptable - I’m not offended by football chants (especially on someone else’s behalf), but it is interesting to see that some versions of abuse are horrifying and others are fine.It’s part and parcel of football - if we are going down the route of treating everything as abuse on a level playing field e.g. homophobic abuse is as bad as ridiculing the oppo keeper (for example) for a complete howler of an error, then the world is going mad2 -
KBslittlesis said:Thing is Seth, I can’t believe for one minute that if you or I piped up & confronted these eejits (70yr old male, 52yr old female) & they tried to larrup us, that others wouldn’t come to our aid?
Or have I watched too many Marvel movies? 🤷♀️
4 -
And in a similar vein, I remember QPR away in the 80’s when David Seaman was their goalkeeper, when he was in front of the away end, there was endless mickey taking by us about his surname, he just laughed and played along - he had the last laugh, as they beat us (88/89 season - Littlewoods Cup, we were leading, then Shirtliff got sent off, Trevor Francis brought himself on and scored both their goals to win it) - at the end of the game Seaman applauded us, and gave us a wink of his eye0
-
Lordflashheart said:And in a similar vein, I remember QPR away in the 80’s when David Seaman was their goalkeeper, when he was in front of the away end, there was endless mickey taking by us about his surname, he just laughed and played along - he had the last laugh, as they beat us (88/89 season - Littlewoods Cup, we were leading, then Shirtliff got sent off, Trevor Francis brought himself on and scored both their goals to win it) - at the end of the game Seaman applauded us, and gave us a wink of his eye4
-
BOWAddick said:Not a great experience yesterday apart from the pub in Charlton Kings before the game. We had a drunken prat next to us who kept up a tirade of loud, foul-mouthed abuse throughout the game in front of some puzzled-looking young children playing by the corner flag.16
-
Lordflashheart said:And in a similar vein, I remember QPR away in the 80’s when David Seaman was their goalkeeper, when he was in front of the away end, there was endless mickey taking by us about his surname, he just laughed and played along - he had the last laugh, as they beat us (88/89 season - Littlewoods Cup, we were leading, then Shirtliff got sent off, Trevor Francis brought himself on and scored both their goals to win it) - at the end of the game Seaman applauded us, and gave us a wink of his eye0
-
Gary Poole said:Lordflashheart said:And in a similar vein, I remember QPR away in the 80’s when David Seaman was their goalkeeper, when he was in front of the away end, there was endless mickey taking by us about his surname, he just laughed and played along - he had the last laugh, as they beat us (88/89 season - Littlewoods Cup, we were leading, then Shirtliff got sent off, Trevor Francis brought himself on and scored both their goals to win it) - at the end of the game Seaman applauded us, and gave us a wink of his eye0
-
Lordflashheart said:Gary Poole said:Lordflashheart said:And in a similar vein, I remember QPR away in the 80’s when David Seaman was their goalkeeper, when he was in front of the away end, there was endless mickey taking by us about his surname, he just laughed and played along - he had the last laugh, as they beat us (88/89 season - Littlewoods Cup, we were leading, then Shirtliff got sent off, Trevor Francis brought himself on and scored both their goals to win it) - at the end of the game Seaman applauded us, and gave us a wink of his eye0
-
Chizz said:Lordflashheart said:Gary Poole said:Lordflashheart said:And in a similar vein, I remember QPR away in the 80’s when David Seaman was their goalkeeper, when he was in front of the away end, there was endless mickey taking by us about his surname, he just laughed and played along - he had the last laugh, as they beat us (88/89 season - Littlewoods Cup, we were leading, then Shirtliff got sent off, Trevor Francis brought himself on and scored both their goals to win it) - at the end of the game Seaman applauded us, and gave us a wink of his eye0
- Sponsored links:
-
Lordflashheart said:Chizz said:Lordflashheart said:Gary Poole said:Lordflashheart said:And in a similar vein, I remember QPR away in the 80’s when David Seaman was their goalkeeper, when he was in front of the away end, there was endless mickey taking by us about his surname, he just laughed and played along - he had the last laugh, as they beat us (88/89 season - Littlewoods Cup, we were leading, then Shirtliff got sent off, Trevor Francis brought himself on and scored both their goals to win it) - at the end of the game Seaman applauded us, and gave us a wink of his eye0
-
clb74 said:KBslittlesis said:Thing is Seth, I can’t believe for one minute that if you or I piped up & confronted these eejits (70yr old male, 52yr old female) & they tried to larrup us, that others wouldn’t come to our aid?
Or have I watched too many Marvel movies? 🤷♀️
I wouldn’t want you to.
I would be taking that decision upon myself.
If you decided to stand by & watch it unfold if it went pear shaped, that’s up to you & your conscience.
🤷♀️0 -
Amazes me that whenever this sort of thing happens it's never, ever within in earshot of the "well, I would have said something" type of people.0
-
Belv said:Amazes me that whenever this sort of thing happens it's never, ever within in earshot of the "well, I would have said something" type of people.5
-
Belv said:Amazes me that whenever this sort of thing happens it's never, ever within in earshot of the "well, I would have said something" type of people.5
-
Belv said:Amazes me that whenever this sort of thing happens it's never, ever within in earshot of the "well, I would have said something" type of people.
Simple as that7 -
So, the three arrested were backing the other side.1
-
Lordflashheart said:Belv said:Amazes me that whenever this sort of thing happens it's never, ever within in earshot of the "well, I would have said something" type of people.
Simple as that
I meant that whenever someone hears this sort of thing you always get "I would have said something to them" or "Why didn't you confront them?", it just never seems to happen in front of those people who "would definitely have said something". Guess the point I was making is that it's very easy to say you would have done if you're not the one witnessing it.
Two people have since said they have seen it and challenged it, so I stand corrected but I have never seen anyone do it.1 -
Belv said:Lordflashheart said:Belv said:Amazes me that whenever this sort of thing happens it's never, ever within in earshot of the "well, I would have said something" type of people.
Simple as that
I meant that whenever someone hears this sort of thing you always get "I would have said something to them" or "Why didn't you confront them?", it just never seems to happen in front of those people who "would definitely have said something". Guess the point I was making is that it's very easy to say you would have done if you're not the one witnessing it.
Two people have since said they have seen it and challenged it, so I stand corrected but I have never seen anyone do it.
These days I imagine the Club would get the Police involved, but different times back then (it was during Prem days)8 -
Lordflashheart said:Belv said:Lordflashheart said:Belv said:Amazes me that whenever this sort of thing happens it's never, ever within in earshot of the "well, I would have said something" type of people.
Simple as that
I meant that whenever someone hears this sort of thing you always get "I would have said something to them" or "Why didn't you confront them?", it just never seems to happen in front of those people who "would definitely have said something". Guess the point I was making is that it's very easy to say you would have done if you're not the one witnessing it.
Two people have since said they have seen it and challenged it, so I stand corrected but I have never seen anyone do it.
These days I imagine the Club would get the Police involved, but different times back then (it was during Prem days)
Seriously, well done your dad.
I've called people out but there have been other times I've decided discretion was the better part of valour (bottled it) because I'm not trained in armed and unarmed combat like @KBslittlesis5 - Sponsored links:
-
Years ago at reading, mid nineties, almost the entire away end was singing “morely takes it up the arse” at Trevor Morley after the rumours that him and Ian Bishop had been caught in bed together0
-
Henry Irving said:Lordflashheart said:Belv said:Lordflashheart said:Belv said:Amazes me that whenever this sort of thing happens it's never, ever within in earshot of the "well, I would have said something" type of people.
Simple as that
I meant that whenever someone hears this sort of thing you always get "I would have said something to them" or "Why didn't you confront them?", it just never seems to happen in front of those people who "would definitely have said something". Guess the point I was making is that it's very easy to say you would have done if you're not the one witnessing it.
Two people have since said they have seen it and challenged it, so I stand corrected but I have never seen anyone do it.
These days I imagine the Club would get the Police involved, but different times back then (it was during Prem days)
Seriously, well done your dad.
I've called people out but there have been other times I've decided discretion was the better part of valour (bottled it) because I'm not trained in armed and unarmed combat like @KBslittlesis3 -
guinnessaddick said:So, the three arrested were backing the other side.
Three fans were arrested for homophobic abuse. These specific three were not Charlton fans but very easily could be and next time might be. Idiots like this are found at the Valley too.1 -
guinnessaddick said:So, the three arrested were backing the other side.9
-
ValleyOfTears said:While (I think) we can all agree that abusing someone for their race or sexual orientation is not at all welcome, there is also the reality that "when wine sinks, words swim" and the contents of the heart becomes clear to all when people are drunk. A football ground is a place where many are intoxicated and things aren't pleasant to hear and see. Sometimes really obnoxious.
But banning people from anything should always be an absolute last resort. There is also a danger that we just want to create a very middle class, polite, nice all seated comfy event where everyone knows the social rules of polite society when it's a working class sport for working men and women often people with crap lives, dire working conditions and "the game" on Saturday was always this outlet for working class people to come together and get a release. . This is not an appeal for people to be allowed to abuse others with impunity but it is an appeal to all those woke "tolerant" individuals to be tolerant of ALL people. Not just the ones that are currently in vogue.
To ban someone who is obnoxiously rude does nothing to change the behaviours you don't like. In my experience, obnoxiously rude people are like that because of being around obnoxiously rude people all their lives. They have had awful lives. Surely accepting and involving such people (two things obnoxious people have possibly rarely experienced in their lives) who are obnoxiously rude may go a long way to changing their unwelcome behaviours.
"Woke" indeed.4 -
Greenhithe said:I sang shit songs as a youth and older. I have invaded pitches. Especially when they gave Arsenal the Arthur Wait and it was raining at Selhurst. And have always accepted swearing and horrible goading of the opposition as part of the package. As for the homophobic abuse I don’t understand the uproar. Get over it, the people singing it are pissed and don’t mean it or are idiots to be pitied. My 2 gay daughters wouldn’t give a shit.
the McCarthyite witch hunt of anyone who doesn’t fit the current template (which by the way I agree with is the right way to be) annoys me.
I do not agree with what you say but will defend with my life your right to say it. I reckon
Some reasonable points in here Greenhithe
1 -
Wheresmeticket? said:ValleyOfTears said:While (I think) we can all agree that abusing someone for their race or sexual orientation is not at all welcome, there is also the reality that "when wine sinks, words swim" and the contents of the heart becomes clear to all when people are drunk. A football ground is a place where many are intoxicated and things aren't pleasant to hear and see. Sometimes really obnoxious.
But banning people from anything should always be an absolute last resort. There is also a danger that we just want to create a very middle class, polite, nice all seated comfy event where everyone knows the social rules of polite society when it's a working class sport for working men and women often people with crap lives, dire working conditions and "the game" on Saturday was always this outlet for working class people to come together and get a release. . This is not an appeal for people to be allowed to abuse others with impunity but it is an appeal to all those woke "tolerant" individuals to be tolerant of ALL people. Not just the ones that are currently in vogue.
To ban someone who is obnoxiously rude does nothing to change the behaviours you don't like. In my experience, obnoxiously rude people are like that because of being around obnoxiously rude people all their lives. They have had awful lives. Surely accepting and involving such people (two things obnoxious people have possibly rarely experienced in their lives) who are obnoxiously rude may go a long way to changing their unwelcome behaviours.
"Woke" indeed.
All sounds very good. But the question is WHO are the intolerant here?
1. Are they ~
People demanding the banning of people who say obnoxious things at football matches when they are drunk ~ banning sounds pretty intolerant to me.
Or are they ~
people who say obnoxious things when they are drunk at football matches to various people they feel like abusing?
It sounds like there is A LOT of intolerance going on everywhere in this age.
I agree with your last point ~ we should indeed defend a tolerant society. And that starts with how much tolerance is in ME. For all persons we are found left wanting in this area of tolerating others.
0 -
Cardinal Sin said:We shouldn't forget the larger numbers who think that Addams Family song is clever or acceptable. Singing about incest at a football match is a step closer to it than the fans it's sung to.
I never see outrage around this, just plenty of LOLS being earned by approving posters.1 -
ValleyOfTears said:Wheresmeticket? said:ValleyOfTears said:While (I think) we can all agree that abusing someone for their race or sexual orientation is not at all welcome, there is also the reality that "when wine sinks, words swim" and the contents of the heart becomes clear to all when people are drunk. A football ground is a place where many are intoxicated and things aren't pleasant to hear and see. Sometimes really obnoxious.
But banning people from anything should always be an absolute last resort. There is also a danger that we just want to create a very middle class, polite, nice all seated comfy event where everyone knows the social rules of polite society when it's a working class sport for working men and women often people with crap lives, dire working conditions and "the game" on Saturday was always this outlet for working class people to come together and get a release. . This is not an appeal for people to be allowed to abuse others with impunity but it is an appeal to all those woke "tolerant" individuals to be tolerant of ALL people. Not just the ones that are currently in vogue.
To ban someone who is obnoxiously rude does nothing to change the behaviours you don't like. In my experience, obnoxiously rude people are like that because of being around obnoxiously rude people all their lives. They have had awful lives. Surely accepting and involving such people (two things obnoxious people have possibly rarely experienced in their lives) who are obnoxiously rude may go a long way to changing their unwelcome behaviours.
"Woke" indeed.
All sounds very good. But the question is WHO are the intolerant here?
1. Are they ~
People demanding the banning of people who say obnoxious things at football matches when they are drunk ~ banning sounds pretty intolerant to me.
Or are they ~
people who say obnoxious things when they are drunk at football matches to various people they feel like abusing?
It sounds like there is A LOT of intolerance going on everywhere in this age.
I agree with your last point ~ we should indeed defend a tolerant society. And that starts with how much tolerance is in ME. For all persons we are found left wanting in this area of tolerating others.
12 -
ValleyOfTears said:Wheresmeticket? said:ValleyOfTears said:While (I think) we can all agree that abusing someone for their race or sexual orientation is not at all welcome, there is also the reality that "when wine sinks, words swim" and the contents of the heart becomes clear to all when people are drunk. A football ground is a place where many are intoxicated and things aren't pleasant to hear and see. Sometimes really obnoxious.
But banning people from anything should always be an absolute last resort. There is also a danger that we just want to create a very middle class, polite, nice all seated comfy event where everyone knows the social rules of polite society when it's a working class sport for working men and women often people with crap lives, dire working conditions and "the game" on Saturday was always this outlet for working class people to come together and get a release. . This is not an appeal for people to be allowed to abuse others with impunity but it is an appeal to all those woke "tolerant" individuals to be tolerant of ALL people. Not just the ones that are currently in vogue.
To ban someone who is obnoxiously rude does nothing to change the behaviours you don't like. In my experience, obnoxiously rude people are like that because of being around obnoxiously rude people all their lives. They have had awful lives. Surely accepting and involving such people (two things obnoxious people have possibly rarely experienced in their lives) who are obnoxiously rude may go a long way to changing their unwelcome behaviours.
"Woke" indeed.
All sounds very good. But the question is WHO are the intolerant here?
1. Are they ~
People demanding the banning of people who say obnoxious things at football matches when they are drunk ~ banning sounds pretty intolerant to me.
Or are they ~
people who say obnoxious things when they are drunk at football matches to various people they feel like abusing?
It sounds like there is A LOT of intolerance going on everywhere in this age.
I agree with your last point ~ we should indeed defend a tolerant society. And that starts with how much tolerance is in ME. For all persons we are found left wanting in this area of tolerating others.
1. Banning people who say unlawful things - yes.
2. Alcohol is not an excuse for unlawful behaviour - no court in the land would accept that defence.
7