Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
'Wimpy Charlton' says the Telegraphs Senior Sports Writer
Comments
-
We should sneak some pastel-coloured pencils into his pencil case. That would learn him.1
-
Palace are every bit as wimpy as Charlton.0
-
Stonewallpenalty19 said:Palace are every bit as wimpy as Charlton.
I dunno, I think this OB footage of last time it went off between us both proves otherwise. Think the end of the second video shows we got a result and came out very much on top. Red Aaaaarmy!!!

5 -
Well I can tell you, if he came anywhere near me I’d punch him right on the …. Ssshhh! Ssshhh ssshhh. He’s coming… What?. Nothing.1
-
Wanker should be hung.
4 -
2
-
Just another ‘Lazy’ journalist trying the rate teams on how ‘hard’ their fans are … zzzzzzzzzz0
-
Refreshing to see they’ve written an article on something other than “wokeness”PragueAddick said:The Telegraph, you say?0 -
Thanks for all the suggestions . . . I must say that my first reaction was up for defending what honour we still have . . . but violence would never be the way.In fact if this comment got more publicity then it would definitely work against us image wise - but on the other hand I don't think we should just let it go. I'm all for being smarter than that.For a start I've sent the offending article to CAFC Press to see if they can have a quiet word with the egit . . . but I haven't heard back. Does anyone on here know Rubashow?Better ideas would be welcome folks . . .0
-
chirpse his doris0
-
Sponsored links:
-
like he's got one!cafcdave123 said:chirpse his doris2 -
It’s the suggestion that the DNA of a club is somehow linked to how ‘hard’ it’s fans are thats just weird …0
-
really? just ignore it and move on would be my advice - who cares what he thinksm_2 said:Thanks for all the suggestions . . . I must say that my first reaction was up for defending what honour we still have . . . but violence would never be the way.In fact if this comment got more publicity then it would definitely work against us image wise - but on the other hand I don't think we should just let it go. I'm all for being smarter than that.For a start I've sent the offending article to CAFC Press to see if they can have a quiet word with the egit . . . but I haven't heard back. Does anyone on here know Rubashow?Better ideas would be welcome folks . . .5 -
The Queen's Park Telegraph and AdvertiserKarim_myBagheri said:
He's the senior sports writer for the telegraph?!DDOUBLEE said:A man that supports QPR and looks like this can't really call any other team wimpy, in my opinion
0 -
I couldn't give a toss what a pseudo Sun journos may think of our club. If they thought anything, I doubt its worth a read.
He'll soon be as redundant as newspapers are becoming.
If you have to write articles like that I think the games over for serious sports columns.
0 -
Palace have and always will be bottom off the pile. Universally accepted.Danny Addick said:He’s right to be honest2 -
Suggestion? Just ignore the fopdoodle.m_2 said:In an article by Thom Gibbs regarding Premiership clubs 'DNA':
Crystal Palace
Supposed DNA
The team of the 80s (confusing, as they weren’t that good during them) south London and proud, bit fight-y but neither as rough as Millwall nor as wimpy as Charlton. Arguably the ultimate yo-yo club.
So are we going to let this obviously biased and misled reporter get away with slander on our great club?
Suggestions please for how we can re-educate him . . .
Everyone outside Croydon … and probably most inside … know the facts.They are insignificant, have no relevance on South London tradition and, if anything, should be pitied.If they disappeared tomorrow, very few would actually care.Meh 😑1









