Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Sandgaard is not Charlton
Comments
-
Bed wetters out as usual.
we’ve protested over managers being told what players to pick, delayed games due to huge under funding and money ball transfers…
now we have boycotters over a poor manager being sacked, and sacked via anything other than face to face.
Jesus wept40 -
sammy391 said:Bed wetters out as usual.
we’ve protested over managers being told what players to pick, delayed games due to huge under funding and money ball transfers…
now we have boycotters over a poor manager being sacked, and sacked via anything other than face to face.
Jesus wept2 -
Piss poor. How silly does he look playing his stupid guitar on the pitch now0
-
The “failure” of Bowyer, Adkins and JJ in the post as Manager reflects very poorly on the club. We tried inexperienced and experienced, insiders and outsiders. Do we know what we want?1
-
It doesn't mean I agree with it however I was made redundant by phone from none other than a UK University...its the way things are done nowadays.1
-
Of course Sandgaard isnt Charlton... He's never lived in the area so why would he be a supporter of the club - This is something that the Accrington owner warned us of a few years ago.
To an extent I cant see Andrew Barclay etc. being any different, other than the fact he'd have PV to potentially advise him - He'd still probably do what he thinks is best for himself, before the club.4 -
Redmidland said:It doesn't mean I agree with it however I was made redundant by phone from none other than a UK University...its the way things are done nowadays.0
-
Bowyer weren’t a failure he gave me one of my best days out following charlton34
-
Todds_right_hook said:Was he hired by phone, had meeting by phone etc?
I wouldn't like be sacked by phone but if my boss lives 5,000 miles away, then surely its part for the course!
how did Adkins get sacked, I think Tommy was in the country at that point. Most agreed on here that Tommy should have sacked him earlier, would it have been acceptable if Tommy sacked Adkins by phone two weeks earlier?0 -
Redmidland said:It doesn't mean I agree with it however I was made redundant by phone from none other than a UK University...its the way things are done nowadays.1
- Sponsored links:
-
There's a bad smell about this.0
-
Sandgaard is not Charlton.
Charlton is not Charlton at present.6 -
I firmly believe that if JJ had stayed in charge we would not be promoted next year, but then I don’t think we will be anyway.
I think we still have two seasons to go in this league and promotion will coincide with our current youth players maturing into the side.
The expectations of some sort of quick fix of our Club after years of abuse were wishful but unrealistic in my opinion. I believe we are moving in the right direction by going with Cat 1 and improving the coaching and medical teams.
Our youth teams under Hamza are playing the way that TS says he wants, and both teams (especially the under 18’s) are easy on the eye and play some fantastic football. It is why I wanted Jason Euell and not JJ.
Still do. I get those who don’t want a Charlton link again, but I think he has talent, the ideas, the enthusiasm, together with the coaching experience, to be a very good manager.
3 -
tangoflash said:I have it on good authority that he sacked JJ via a tick tock video................4
-
Prince Andrew would lose his shit if he heard about this method of communication
Sandgaurd has lost honourable points
0 -
People messing their nappy about whether it was done over the blower. Same people that whine when they get dumped by text. The outcome is the same irrespective of the method. It’s business ffs.
0 -
Wheresmeticket? said:tangoflash said:I have it on good authority that he sacked JJ via a tick tock video................1
-
se9addick said:sammy391 said:Bed wetters out as usual.
we’ve protested over managers being told what players to pick, delayed games due to huge under funding and money ball transfers…
now we have boycotters over a poor manager being sacked, and sacked via anything other than face to face.
Jesus wept
0 -
Wheresmeticket? said:tangoflash said:I have it on good authority that he sacked JJ via a tick tock video................
0 -
Personally if i was being made redundant, i'd rather it was done by phone. Avoids the face to face awkwardness, fake handshakes, then having to get up and leave the room.
You can just say my agent will be in touch regarding the pay off settlement, put the phone down and it's done.6 - Sponsored links:
-
Chris_from_Sidcup said:Personally if i was being made redundant, i'd rather it was done by phone. Avoids the face to face awkwardness, fake handshakes, then having to get up and leave the room.
You can just say my agent will be in touch regarding the pay off settlement, put the phone down and it's done.
Bit shit house isn't it?0 -
Redrobo said:I firmly believe that if JJ had stayed in charge we would not be promoted next year, but then I don’t think we will be anyway.
I think we still have two seasons to go in this league and promotion will coincide with our current youth players maturing into the side.
The expectations of some sort of quick fix of our Club after years of abuse were wishful but unrealistic in my opinion. I believe we are moving in the right direction by going with Cat 1 and improving the coaching and medical teams.
Our youth teams under Hamza are playing the way that TS says he wants, and both teams (especially the under 18’s) are easy on the eye and play some fantastic football. It is why I wanted Jason Euell and not JJ.
Still do. I get those who don’t want a Charlton link again, but I think he has talent, the ideas, the enthusiasm, together with the coaching experience, to be a very good manager.0 -
carly burn said:Chris_from_Sidcup said:Personally if i was being made redundant, i'd rather it was done by phone. Avoids the face to face awkwardness, fake handshakes, then having to get up and leave the room.
You can just say my agent will be in touch regarding the pay off settlement, put the phone down and it's done.
Bit shit house isn't it?
2 -
Phone call, Zoom call, whatever, the honeymoon for Sandgaard is clearly over, some fans wanted Jackson out and that decision will be better looked at with a lot of hindsight. Sandgaard is running out of faith, with the fans, and time to realise his long term plan, get the next decisions wrong and the sacking of Jackson will be reassessed just as Adkins sacking is now.1
-
The incoming will be cheap and desperate. This is not an owner who is going to shock us all. Unless of course he appoints a woman.0
-
masicat said:The incoming will be cheap and desperate. This is not an owner who is going to shock us all. Unless of course he appoints a woman.19
-
masicat said:The incoming will be cheap and desperate. This is not an owner who is going to shock us all. Unless of course he appoints a woman.
Personally I’d rather we gambled on Beale or someone doing well and playing good football at a smaller club.3 -
I always got the feeling that TS never wanted JJ as permanent boss, which that is why he took a while to make it so and mainly because of the fans. Probably why he gave him a contract that if he did not do well he could sack him with less compensation9
-
ross1 said:I always got the feeling that TS never wanted JJ as permanent boss, which that is why he took a while to make it so and mainly because of the fans. Probably why he gave him a contract that if he did not do well he could sack him with less compensation1
-
Let’s face it, we don’t know how it happened. What we do know is that TS was over at the weekend and will have met with JJ. We also know, I think, that JJ’s contract required a top 8 finish. TS will have been waiting to see how near we were going to get but it’s been clear for some time that top 8 was not achievable.
I suspect the writing was on the wall before the Ipswich game which may explain the capitulation. Remember we got stuffed 3-0 in Russell Slade’s last game, no doubt for similar reasons.4