Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Now's the time for Sandgaard to SELL UP
Comments
-
Read the notes from the last Fans Forum meeting. TS is going nowhere.0
-
He will when the fans turn against him.EveshamAddick said:Read the notes from the last Fans Forum meeting. TS is going nowhere.
His ego wouldn't be able to cope with him getting abused.4 -
Roland did.blackpool72 said:
He will when the fans turn against him.EveshamAddick said:Read the notes from the last Fans Forum meeting. TS is going nowhere.
His ego wouldn't be able to cope with him getting abused.0 -
His wallet might disagree with himEveshamAddick said:Read the notes from the last Fans Forum meeting. TS is going nowhere.3 -
It’s much, much worse than that, which is why the staff are walking away, for one thing.Todds_right_hook said:
I agree with the roland part but sandgaard? Things aren't going smoothly at the moment but things are a lot better with Tommy in charge at the moment then when southall, Elliot, the dentist from cardiff etc were in charge.blackpool72 said:Sandgaard is an egotistical narsacist and no good will ever come from him being our owner.
But as I've pointed out many a time who will buy a loss making third division club with no assets.
Roland and Sandgaard between them have put us in a perilous position and I really don't know what the outcome will be.
it was only two years ago that there was the Charlton court case match thread on here. How close to folding were we?Roland sold to southall who separated the assets which put us in this position. Then we had the southall scandal, relegation due to efl embargo's, Dave Jones lined up, court cases etc. sandgaard saved us but has then got a couple of transfer windows wrong. Not exactly comparable in my view.31 -
We have declined on the pitch since his arrival and the behind the scenes stuff is crazy to me. A lot of this staff stayed during the Roland years yet we are seeing people walk away in droves under TS. Speaks volumes.Airman Brown said:
It’s much, much worse than that, which is why the staff are walking away, for one thing.Todds_right_hook said:
I agree with the roland part but sandgaard? Things aren't going smoothly at the moment but things are a lot better with Tommy in charge at the moment then when southall, Elliot, the dentist from cardiff etc were in charge.blackpool72 said:Sandgaard is an egotistical narsacist and no good will ever come from him being our owner.
But as I've pointed out many a time who will buy a loss making third division club with no assets.
Roland and Sandgaard between them have put us in a perilous position and I really don't know what the outcome will be.
it was only two years ago that there was the Charlton court case match thread on here. How close to folding were we?Roland sold to southall who separated the assets which put us in this position. Then we had the southall scandal, relegation due to efl embargo's, Dave Jones lined up, court cases etc. sandgaard saved us but has then got a couple of transfer windows wrong. Not exactly comparable in my view.
I really hope someone can provide a small bit of good news and say he is open to selling.Somethings got to give here.18 -
For me, it’s not protest stage as yet (it may well be for some), but I only want him to stay if he’s going to accept he’s monumentally dicked it up and is willing to employ proper football people to turn it around.
I realise that’s extremely unlikely, but we’re now past the point of defending his ownership of the club. It’s been a disaster.He needs to employ a CEO not affiliated to him in any way, get out of his way and let that person run the club. If he can’t do that then it’s going to get worse. Even little things like stop playing his stupid song. It might be insignificant in turning things around, but it might be a small sign that he’s willing to realise this isn’t about him. I’m not sure when he’s over again, but he’s likely to see a similar atmosphere he saw at the Accrington Stanley game last year, but the anger will be directed at him, not the manager5 -
I think he’s knows his approach is not right, but just can’t eat humble pie and admit it’s beyond him (publicly).CH4RLTON said:I'd settle for him just losing his ego and accepting it is not all about him and his family. I can accept being on a tight budget and scrapping, but when you have an arrogant owner who fails to acknowledge anything is wrong is just angers you!!!!!!!!0 -
I must have been a right arsehole I my previous life for my old man to introduce me to Charlton7
-
If he sells Charlton next week..
His personal achievements of 2 years
1. reduction of home game ticket sales
2. Significant drop in league position. We can't win football matches!
3. Sacking staff
4. Staff resigning
5. Losing more than roughly £16million overall (a guess)
6. Still can't buy the stadium
7. No 5 year plan direction at all
It's been a disaster. Not all his own fault, but a large chunk of it is.
He has made an effort in small doses, but the best thing for him to do is sell the club as soon as possible.
I'm 99% certain he wants to sell Charlton and he knows the whole thing was a mistake.
We all make mistakes. Why not be honest about it and just do the right dignified thing. He doesn't need Charlton in his life.
Successful businessman/women have to make mistakes so they can learn from them.
Damage limitation!
Damage limitation can be a tough one to accept. No one wants to open up about being wrong, or to only minimise further escalating problems.
Everyone needs to know when it is best to stop and when it is best to just walk away. Give yourself some peace.
His family may now be advising him to sell, and to do it quickly.6 - Sponsored links:
-
To whom????????Dave2l said:If he sells Charlton next week..
His personal achievements of 2 years
1. reduction of home game ticket sales
2. Significant drop in league position. We can't win football matches!
3. Sacking staff
4. Staff resigning
5. Losing more than roughly £16million overall (a guess)
6. Still can't buy the stadium
7. No 5 year plan direction at all
It's been a disaster. Not all his own fault, but a large chunk of it is.
He has made an effort in small doses, but the best thing for him to do is sell the club as soon as possible.
I'm 99% certain he wants to sell Charlton and he knows the whole thing was a mistake.
We all make mistakes. Why not be honest about it and just do the right dignified thing. He doesn't need Charlton in his life.
Successful businessman/women have to make mistakes so they can learn from them.
Damage limitation!
Damage limitation can be a tough one to accept. No one wants to open up about being wrong, or to only minimise further escalating problems.
Everyone needs to know when it is best to stop and when it is best to just walk away. Give yourself some peace.
His family may now be advising him to sell, and to do it quickly.4 -
Thomas if you read this:
WHEN THE FUN STOPS STOP!!! 🛑7 -
Very easy for people to start shouting the odds and saying “he should sell” - that’s the easy part. If he’s going to sell us then someone decent needs to want to buy. No matter how bad you think it is now it could be significantly worse, our own recent history should have taught us all that.
20 -
Sign up whoever is running the Sidemen youtube channel. Let them run our social media. set up a KSI V Stockley charity boxing match.
full stadium and 10 million viewers.7 -
Given how infrequently Stockley hits the target this season I don’t think KSI has too much to worry about!Manic_mania said:Sign up whoever is running the Sidemen youtube channel. Let them run our social media. set up a KSI V Stockley charity boxing match.
full stadium and 10 million viewers.6 -
Can we get back to RodneyCharltonTrotter the one handed pot noodle man, who can only have a left hand wank, he’s just finished the out of date pot noodle and with stomach rumbling has tripped up and busted his left hand as he was legging it to the bog to unload, if he gets there in time …..
(poor cnut hasn’t even realised he’s not gonna be able to wipe his bum)4 -
carly burn said:
To whom????????Dave2l said:If he sells Charlton next week..
His personal achievements of 2 years
1. reduction of home game ticket sales
2. Significant drop in league position. We can't win football matches!
3. Sacking staff
4. Staff resigning
5. Losing more than roughly £16million overall (a guess)
6. Still can't buy the stadium
7. No 5 year plan direction at all
It's been a disaster. Not all his own fault, but a large chunk of it is.
He has made an effort in small doses, but the best thing for him to do is sell the club as soon as possible.
I'm 99% certain he wants to sell Charlton and he knows the whole thing was a mistake.
We all make mistakes. Why not be honest about it and just do the right dignified thing. He doesn't need Charlton in his life.
Successful businessman/women have to make mistakes so they can learn from them.
Damage limitation!
Damage limitation can be a tough one to accept. No one wants to open up about being wrong, or to only minimise further escalating problems.
Everyone needs to know when it is best to stop and when it is best to just walk away. Give yourself some peace.
His family may now be advising him to sell, and to do it quickly.
Some nutcase who likes football0 -
Quite a few of those on this forum!Dave2l said:carly burn said:
To whom????????Dave2l said:If he sells Charlton next week..
His personal achievements of 2 years
1. reduction of home game ticket sales
2. Significant drop in league position. We can't win football matches!
3. Sacking staff
4. Staff resigning
5. Losing more than roughly £16million overall (a guess)
6. Still can't buy the stadium
7. No 5 year plan direction at all
It's been a disaster. Not all his own fault, but a large chunk of it is.
He has made an effort in small doses, but the best thing for him to do is sell the club as soon as possible.
I'm 99% certain he wants to sell Charlton and he knows the whole thing was a mistake.
We all make mistakes. Why not be honest about it and just do the right dignified thing. He doesn't need Charlton in his life.
Successful businessman/women have to make mistakes so they can learn from them.
Damage limitation!
Damage limitation can be a tough one to accept. No one wants to open up about being wrong, or to only minimise further escalating problems.
Everyone needs to know when it is best to stop and when it is best to just walk away. Give yourself some peace.
His family may now be advising him to sell, and to do it quickly.
Some nutcase who likes football2 -
We're already owned by a nutcase who likes football.Dave2l said:carly burn said:
To whom????????Dave2l said:If he sells Charlton next week..
His personal achievements of 2 years
1. reduction of home game ticket sales
2. Significant drop in league position. We can't win football matches!
3. Sacking staff
4. Staff resigning
5. Losing more than roughly £16million overall (a guess)
6. Still can't buy the stadium
7. No 5 year plan direction at all
It's been a disaster. Not all his own fault, but a large chunk of it is.
He has made an effort in small doses, but the best thing for him to do is sell the club as soon as possible.
I'm 99% certain he wants to sell Charlton and he knows the whole thing was a mistake.
We all make mistakes. Why not be honest about it and just do the right dignified thing. He doesn't need Charlton in his life.
Successful businessman/women have to make mistakes so they can learn from them.
Damage limitation!
Damage limitation can be a tough one to accept. No one wants to open up about being wrong, or to only minimise further escalating problems.
Everyone needs to know when it is best to stop and when it is best to just walk away. Give yourself some peace.
His family may now be advising him to sell, and to do it quickly.
Some nutcase who likes football
We don't want another.2 -
Would love to see him do the lap of honour that he did at Wycombe now.
Sandgaard didn’t save us, he just delayed our demise.4 - Sponsored links:
-
I can see it taking a move away from The Valley to force Roland's hand, once Sandgaard finally realises that the game is up.
Roland might not feel so happy about things when he's not receiving his £500k a year for the assets that he still holds and can't do anything with them.0 -
Who is going to pay £8 million for a club worth next to nothing with no assets ? No one. That’s who.0
-
Where are you getting the 8million pound figure from?ShootersHillGuru said:Who is going to pay £8 million for a club worth next to nothing with no assets ? No one. That’s who.0 -
If I bought the club for £1 and knew that I’d need to put in £8 million to keep it afloat that’s effectively a cost of £8 million. It’s also a rinse and repeat cost.cafcfan1990 said:
Where are you getting the 8million pound figure from?ShootersHillGuru said:Who is going to pay £8 million for a club worth next to nothing with no assets ? No one. That’s who.1 -
who is going to pay £8 for a club worth next to nothing with no assets come to that!0
-
Simple, another egotistical narcissist, there's plenty of them knocking around. I'd argue most owners outside the prem are, there's no other reason to run a club!blackpool72 said:Sandgaard is an egotistical narsacist and no good will ever come from him being our owner.
But as I've pointed out many a time who will buy a loss making third division club with no assets.
Roland and Sandgaard between them have put us in a perilous position and I really don't know what the outcome will be.1 -
Moving away from theValley doesn’t negate the club’s responsibility under the terms of the lease. We’re still responsible for the annual payment.superclive98 said:I can see it taking a move away from The Valley to force Roland's hand, once Sandgaard finally realises that the game is up.
Roland might not feel so happy about things when he's not receiving his £500k a year for the assets that he still holds and can't do anything with them.3 -
Who knows exactly the terms of that lease, in whose name it is signed. I'm sure there are ways around that sort of thing.SomervilleAddick said:
Moving away from theValley doesn’t negate the club’s responsibility under the terms of the lease. We’re still responsible for the annual payment.superclive98 said:I can see it taking a move away from The Valley to force Roland's hand, once Sandgaard finally realises that the game is up.
Roland might not feel so happy about things when he's not receiving his £500k a year for the assets that he still holds and can't do anything with them.2 -
LOL!superclive98 said:
Who knows exactly the terms of that lease, in whose name it is signed. I'm sure there are ways around that sort of thing.SomervilleAddick said:
Moving away from theValley doesn’t negate the club’s responsibility under the terms of the lease. We’re still responsible for the annual payment.superclive98 said:I can see it taking a move away from The Valley to force Roland's hand, once Sandgaard finally realises that the game is up.
Roland might not feel so happy about things when he's not receiving his £500k a year for the assets that he still holds and can't do anything with them.
Nobody knows what's in the lease, but you're "sure" there are ways around it. Great stuff!4 -
Are you saying you don’t consider Chuks Aneke an asset?ShootersHillGuru said:Who is going to pay £8 million for a club worth next to nothing with no assets ? No one. That’s who.4
