Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Jesurun Rak-Sakyi - 2023-4 season progress.
Comments
-
Meh! they couldn't take a few more back with him, that might help.
1 -
He’s not going to have developed much surrounded by a team of failures is he1
-
EugenesAxe said:He’s not going to have developed much surrounded by a team of failures is he4
-
We’ve become a feeder club for the spanners, who are a feeder club for the nigels. 🤮1
-
iaitch said:EugenesAxe said:He’s not going to have developed much surrounded by a team of failures is he
0 -
Do loan players always have to play for clubs that are doing well? Surely, part of a young player's development is learn that things aren't always so easy. If I was at Palace, I'd leave him be because he's playing EVERY week and normally getting lots of minutes too....not just 10 mins here and there. Opponents also now know some of his tricks and that he tends to turn inside a lot. It's up to R-S to find a way to keep one step ahead. Being a sub for Millwall isn't going to help much in that regard.2
-
He’s also getting Charltonised0
-
Simonsen said:Do loan players always have to play for clubs that are doing well? Surely, part of a young player's development is learn that things aren't always so easy. If I was at Palace, I'd leave him be because he's playing EVERY week and normally getting lots of minutes too....not just 10 mins here and there. Opponents also now know some of his tricks and that he tends to turn inside a lot. It's up to R-S to find a way to keep one step ahead. Being a sub for Millwall isn't going to help much in that regard.0
-
EugenesAxe said:He’s not going to have developed much surrounded by a team of failures is he1
-
ElfsborgAddick said:Simonsen said:Do loan players always have to play for clubs that are doing well? Surely, part of a young player's development is learn that things aren't always so easy. If I was at Palace, I'd leave him be because he's playing EVERY week and normally getting lots of minutes too....not just 10 mins here and there. Opponents also now know some of his tricks and that he tends to turn inside a lot. It's up to R-S to find a way to keep one step ahead. Being a sub for Millwall isn't going to help much in that regard.0
- Sponsored links:
-
SoundAsa£ said:EugenesAxe said:He’s not going to have developed much surrounded by a team of failures is he0
-
Rumours on social media that he's being recalled and sent on loan to Barnsley2
-
KentishAddick said:Rumours on social media that he's being recalled and sent on loan to Barnsley3
-
Good luck to him still young and we're a shitshow so not really fair to judge him too harshly3
-
No great loss in my opinion , as long as we get in another option to replace1
-
Have really enjoyed some of his performances - he has a class touch, but some of his misses and choices prove he is a rookie at this stage who perhaps we cannot afford to rely upon while battling away from the drop zone. Hope he stays on balance, but if a more wiley forward was the trade off, would make sense I suppose.0
-
Leaburns puts away that chance he set him up against Oxford it’s 2-2 and game on
he will be missed, a proper talent5 -
Makes us weaker losing him. I can see why Barnsley would be interested. Up there earlier in the season he was very effective against them in another generally lacklustre defeat. He’ll do better there than at our shitshow.4
-
Pity if he goes. Would shine more with better players around him.9
-
He could frustrate at times but he looks like the confidence has been drained out of him since he's been here. Makes sense that they move him on to a side that's winning games. Watch him start to waltz this league again soon.
A lost opportunity and leaves us even shorter.
3 - Sponsored links:
-
It might be a mutual-consent type of thing. Perhaps we've also decided he's not what we need in a relegation scrap and are confident of replacing him.0
-
I shan't miss him, thought he was average with occasional spasms of good feet in the box, but not what we need.0
-
jams said:No great loss in my opinion , as long as we get in another option to replace0
-
I am frustrated but can understand why Palace want him moved on. He was very much a Garner signing.
I did wonder when we were linked with Shane Ferguson whether this might occur. JRS has also been on the bench for the last couple of games under Holden as well.
0 -
Still not getting my head around the idea of him being recalled somehow improves us.18
-
Last few games he couldn't hit a barn door with a banjo.
If we're playing 352 he doesn't get a look in anyway as he's not a striker or a wing back, at least CBT has played LWB before0 -
People happy to be losing a first team player when there's no guarantees we have any money or sense to get better options.
Weird. If true we're currently one step closer to relegation.12 -
I know a youth coach at Palace. They’re really concerned that his development has stalled with us and he only really went to us in the first place because of Ben Garners reputation with them.
Ultimately losing him means we’re left with Kirk, DJ and CBT as wingers which is a disaster in a relegation battle.4 -
Would you want your young talent to be exposed to this shit show? I certainly wouldn't.
Would think the Leaburns are thinking along the same lines.0 -
We probably need to bring in 7 or 8 players just to change the mentality around the players. (Not saying that is going to happen). No doubt that confidence (of all players) is on the low side. So if he needs to go to free up a squad place then fine.0