Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
*****9th JULY Q&A EVENT CANCELLED*****
Comments
-
if it's who's being reported as varney who is leading the alleged takeover, do you really think that a q&a is going to jeopardise it....really?0
-
[cite]Posted By: ThreadKiller[/cite]if it's who's being reported as varney who is leading the alleged takeover, do you really think that a q&a is going to jeopardise it....really?
from my understanding Varney is nothing to do with the takeover only brokering the deal0 -
What the fukk is going on, im well confused?
Im gunna stick my neck out and say that in the next 2 weeks all will become clear, you heard it hear first ;-)0 -
[cite]Posted By: ThreadKiller[/cite]if it's who's being reported as varney who is leading the alleged takeover, do you really think that a q&a is going to jeopardise it....really?
I think it would make the whole exercise pointless. Every question concerning a T/O would be met with a "no comment" or some variation, if the vendees want to retain their confidentiality then it's something we should respect - we'll find out soon enough who they are. The next questions they'd have faced - on PP's status couldn't be answered either for obvious reasons. The only thing that they'd have been able to discuss was the new sponsor and the state of the potholes in the car-park.0 -
[cite]Posted By: ThreadKiller[/cite]if it's who's being reported as varney who is leading the alleged takeover, do you really think that a q&a is going to jeopardise it....really?
Yes bluntly. Otherwise why have a confidentiality agreement in the first place?
I don't know the shape of any NDA but if I was their lawyer, I would be very wary of them speaking at a public forum, especially as they will know in advance that much, if not all of the meeting will be taken up with questions to which the answer is "no comment".
As a school governor, I was recently involved in a situation where the Head Teacher had to take a leave of absence. As a governor I was told not even to ask a question of the Chair of Governors (who was the only one who knew the details) what was the reason for his leave. We were just told that he was on a voluntary leave of absence and that was all we could tell parents. Sometimes how you give no comment answers can be telling. In this case it was to protect the Head's human rights. (I subsequently found out the nature of why he took leave of absence and he did return). Parents and the local community made their own mind up as to why he was away and despite his return, the damage to him personally was done for which he never recovered.
So confidentiality is important even though the vacuum it creates makes PR very difficult.0 -
dc.....if you are still at the helm come the start of the season, will pp still be your choice of manager? .........no comment.
rm....if you are still at the helm come the start of the season,will the pot holes be sorted?........no comment0 -
[cite]Posted By: ThreadKiller[/cite]dc.....if you are still at the helm come the start of the season, will pp still be your choice of manager? .........no comment.
rm....if you are still at the helm come the start of the season,will the pot holes be sorted?........no comment
Lol!0 -
Bing what was the reason for the heads absence?0
-
i don't think this Q&A was ever going to go ahead. just stringing everyone along.0
-
Not sure they'd do that, but I do believe that they thought the takeover would have been done by now, so this event would have just been taking the bows. I don't think that meeting their public as controllers of the club was every really going to happen though.[cite]Posted By: Ledge[/cite]i don't think this Q&A was ever going to go ahead. just stringing everyone along.0 -
Sponsored links:
-
[cite]Posted By: Ledge[/cite]i don't think this Q&A was ever going to go ahead. just stringing everyone along.
Of course. By the way, did you hear that Elvis and Jimi Hendrix were murdered to keep them quiet about their part in the JFK assassination plot?0 -
[cite]Posted By: McLovin[/cite]
Not sure they'd do that, but I do believe that they thought the takeover would have been done by now, so this event would have just been taking the bows. I don't think that meeting their public as controllers of the club was every really going to happen though.[cite]Posted By: Ledge[/cite]i don't think this Q&A was ever going to go ahead. just stringing everyone along.
Hopefully Chappell wont be taking any bows... seems its all gone pear shaped since he joined as a director let alone chairman.0 -
[cite]Posted By: McLovin[/cite]
Not sure they'd do that, but I do believe that they thought the takeover would have been done by now, so this event would have just been taking the bows. I don't think that meeting their public as controllers of the club was every really going to happen though.[cite]Posted By: Ledge[/cite]i don't think this Q&A was ever going to go ahead. just stringing everyone along.
Lol no but they'd lie about ST sales wouldn't the McLovin ;o)0 -
What I don't comprehend is the fact they agreed for the Q&A session to go ahead in the first place whilst in the middle of takeover talks. Surely you learn from your previous mistakes (ie the cancelled session at Bromley during the Zabeel talks) and don't repeat them.
Who are these mysterious legal advisors anyway? The bunch down at Kings Hill?0 -
[cite]Posted By: Addickted[/cite]What I don't comprehend is the fact they agreed for the Q&A session to go ahead in the first place whilst in the middle of takeover talks. Surely you learn from your previous mistakes (ie the cancelled session at Bromley during the Zabeel talks) and don't repeat them.
Who are these mysterious legal advisors anyway? The bunch down at Kings Hill?
Well there were enough people on here complaining about a lack of info, so they must have felt obliged to agree and hope that the deal had been done by then. Or maybe a deal had fallen through and since been resurected.0 -
[cite]Posted By: Addickted[/cite]What I don't comprehend is the fact they agreed for the Q&A session to go ahead in the first place whilst in the middle of takeover talks. Surely you learn from your previous mistakes (ie the cancelled session at Bromley during the Zabeel talks) and don't repeat them.
Who are these mysterious legal advisors anyway? The bunch down at Kings Hill?
Times are hard, we now qualify for "Legal Aid "0 -
So how did it go last night? any juicy news.... what? oh...0
-
I bet some people did turn up last night.0
-
[cite]Posted By: Curb_It[/cite]So how did it go last night? any juicy news.... what? oh...
Not many people there. Quite a poor turn out really.
Still that meant plenty of chances to ask questions of RM, DC and the new owners.
Nothing earth shattering. Was recorded for CAFCTV so can watch it all then0 -
Rather read about it on the O/S, cause then I know its true.0
-
Sponsored links:
-
[cite]Posted By: Henry Irving[/cite][cite]Posted By: Curb_It[/cite]So how did it go last night? any juicy news.... what? oh...
Not many people there. Quite a poor turn out really.
Still that meant plenty of chances to ask questions of RM, DC and the new owners.
Nothing earth shattering. Was recorded for CAFCTV so can watch it all then
I thought it wasn't on??0 -
probably the only thing ever worth watching on CAFCTV...
0 -
[cite]Posted By: CAFCBourne[/cite]
I thought it wasn't on??
Whooooooooooooooooooooosh0 -
is this back on now?0
-
[cite]Posted By: Dazzler21[/cite][cite]Posted By: CAFCBourne[/cite]
I thought it wasn't on??
Whooooooooooooooooooooosh
Is that the speed of you running Dazzler?? lol0 -
cheers for that Oli ;o)
Me running is more like Whooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooosh0 -
More like Whosh!! Mr slow coach lol0
-
[cite]Posted By: Dazzler21[/cite]cheers for that Oli ;o)
Me running is more like
plod plod plod
;-)0 -
ha ha ha!0
-
so when is the new date?0
