Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Not Safe For Work - Charlton and trains

CharltonAthMuseum
Posts: 553
Donation to the museum today

7
Comments
-
3 -
I would have been there for almost all the home games .. some great teams on that list .. but compare Man City with Bury !2
-
Part of a lovely donation of programmes, handbooks and a wonderful scrapbook from Paul Lloyd1
-
the Bury and Orient back to backs are interesting for bank holidays
0 -
"Children 3 and under 14 years, half price"
Help!0 -
Two midweek fixtures with Newcastle in the space of 10 days. Plus Orient and Bury back to back matches.Palace two midweek matches within two weeks.
Modern day footballers would be unable to cope with that amount of travel by coach?0 -
Well Charlton could not cope with those above matches winning 1 and drawing 1 and losing 6
What was interesting was the attendance against Newcastle 22939
Palace 31498
Both mid-week home matches and our top two home attendances of the season.2 -
I note my journey from Grove Park was just 3 bob (now £7.60). It could be quite eventful depending on who joined the train at London Bridge.
I thought the Bexley fare was a bit steep at 5/4 - perhaps they added a bit for poshness.0 -
Return trains to London Bridge at 1645 and 1650… was there no half time in the 60s?!0
-
Of course half time took place ,10 minutes break. Players were tougher back than hardly any injury time back than as it was called.
Players not falling over ever few seconds or 5 subs every match.Happy days of youth and freedom.3 - Sponsored links:
-
Some good fixtures and Bury, sadly no longer with us:(0
-
paulsturgess said:Return trains to London Bridge at 1645 and 1650… was there no half time in the 60s?!
10 minutes break half time.
The first full time results would start appearing on the BBC vidiprinter at 4.40pm.
No added time for minor knocks and stoppages and no subs until our Keithie in '652 -
5 -
They were additional trains to the normal timetable.
Almost as if they thought they were there to provide some kind of, I dunno…service?3 -
PragueAddick said:They were additional trains to the normal timetable.
Almost as if they thought they were there to provide some kind of, I dunno…service?0 -
cblock said:PragueAddick said:They were additional trains to the normal timetable.
Almost as if they thought they were there to provide some kind of, I dunno…service?0 -
killerandflash said:cblock said:PragueAddick said:They were additional trains to the normal timetable.
Almost as if they thought they were there to provide some kind of, I dunno…service?I’m on shaky ground since I was already a foreign- based ‘traitor’ by then but I also still had a season ticket, and sometimes I’d try to check if I could easily get to the Valley from Eltham, and the Blackheath “connection” was an absolute joke. It actually seems better now.@Airman Brown would know. As I recall, though, it wasn’t possible to add football extra trains because privatisation had brought in the “slot” system similar to airports, and the train operator didnt want to buy extra slota which would only be used irregularly (and perhaps made redundant on any given weekend by Sky messing with the game schedule). And up to a point, they had a point. (It requires us to accept that there was a point to the ridiculous UK privatisation of rail in the first place)0 -
When we played you at The Valley in the FA Cup in 2002, there was a football special from Blackpool. Think it was hauled by a 47 but the memory is a bit distant. Not that I was on it, we were all in the pub (Antigalligan or something) when it was pulling in.2
-
Hertsseasider said:When we played you at The Valley in the FA Cup in 2002, there was a football special from Blackpool. Think it was hauled by a 47 but the memory is a bit distant. Not that I was on it, we were all in the pub (Antigalligan or something) when it was pulling in.
Addick porn...0 -
PragueAddick said:killerandflash said:cblock said:PragueAddick said:They were additional trains to the normal timetable.
Almost as if they thought they were there to provide some kind of, I dunno…service?I’m on shaky ground since I was already a foreign- based ‘traitor’ by then but I also still had a season ticket, and sometimes I’d try to check if I could easily get to the Valley from Eltham, and the Blackheath “connection” was an absolute joke. It actually seems better now.@Airman Brown would know. As I recall, though, it wasn’t possible to add football extra trains because privatisation had brought in the “slot” system similar to airports, and the train operator didnt want to buy extra slota which would only be used irregularly (and perhaps made redundant on any given weekend by Sky messing with the game schedule). And up to a point, they had a point. (It requires us to accept that there was a point to the ridiculous UK privatisation of rail in the first place)1 - Sponsored links:
-
killerandflash said:PragueAddick said:killerandflash said:cblock said:PragueAddick said:They were additional trains to the normal timetable.
Almost as if they thought they were there to provide some kind of, I dunno…service?I’m on shaky ground since I was already a foreign- based ‘traitor’ by then but I also still had a season ticket, and sometimes I’d try to check if I could easily get to the Valley from Eltham, and the Blackheath “connection” was an absolute joke. It actually seems better now.@Airman Brown would know. As I recall, though, it wasn’t possible to add football extra trains because privatisation had brought in the “slot” system similar to airports, and the train operator didnt want to buy extra slota which would only be used irregularly (and perhaps made redundant on any given weekend by Sky messing with the game schedule). And up to a point, they had a point. (It requires us to accept that there was a point to the ridiculous UK privatisation of rail in the first place)0