Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Who will be the new Charlton coach? - p103. Nathan Jones confirmed
Comments
-
4 -
9 -
Can't Curbs have a word with the LMA, isn't he a bigwig there?
Probably doesn't make much difference. He can still take training on Monday.2 -
ross1 said:I would be surprised if Jones has not watched some videos of our games and still interested. Probably hoping that as we have practically changed the team it could be better4
-
Never knew that RE: Contracts needing legal sign off from the LMA2
-
fenaddick said:0
-
Yeah the LMA needing sign off is a new one on me too. Never seen that mentioned before at any club.
Probably means a Monday announcement now0 -
ForeverAddickted said:Never knew that RE: Contracts needing legal sign off from the LMA
Only applies to CAFC managers.23 -
Oh that is so Charlton5
-
Macronate said:ForeverAddickted said:Never knew that RE: Contracts needing legal sign off from the LMA
Only applies to CAFC managers.1 -
Sponsored links:
-
Scoham said:SouthLincsAddick said:I don’t know about anyone else but I’m getting very nervous about the lack of announcement. Is it done and the comms people are doing their stuff or is it because we don’t want any distractions before a crucial game, or are negotiations still ongoing and Scott is the problem (again). Someone in the know put us out of our misery.4
-
eastterrace6168 said:Macronate said:ForeverAddickted said:Never knew that RE: Contracts needing legal sign off from the LMA
Only applies to CAFC managers.3 -
ForeverAddickted said:Never knew that RE: Contracts needing legal sign off from the LMA
5 -
Scoham said:8
-
The LMA can’t hold any authoritative position in all of this though. Isn’t it effectively a Trade Union for managers ? Quite honestly what the effing hell has what job Nathan Jones chooses got to do with them ?4
-
golfaddick said:ForeverAddickted said:Never knew that RE: Contracts needing legal sign off from the LMA0
-
ShootersHillGuru said:The LMA can’t hold any authoritative position in all of this though. Isn’t it effectively a Trade Union for managers ? Quite honestly what the effing he’ll has what job Nathan Jones got to do with them ?6
-
If that had been a premiership team that would be signed off …3
-
If Jones was announced today would the result go down on his stats ?? As in his contract starts today & so the match falls into the period he was employed by the club.
Can see he might not want to start with a loss on his record....😄5 -
To be fair, it’s not a bad thing! All focus needs to be on a decent performance today! The players still know they are being watched by their new gaffer anyway.4
-
Sponsored links:
-
golfaddick said:If Jones was announced today would the result go down on his stats ?? As in his contract starts today & so the match falls into the period he was employed by the club.
Can see he might not want to start with a loss on his record....😄0 -
golfaddick said:Scoham said:SouthLincsAddick said:I don’t know about anyone else but I’m getting very nervous about the lack of announcement. Is it done and the comms people are doing their stuff or is it because we don’t want any distractions before a crucial game, or are negotiations still ongoing and Scott is the problem (again). Someone in the know put us out of our misery.
0 -
fenaddick said:ShootersHillGuru said:The LMA can’t hold any authoritative position in all of this though. Isn’t it effectively a Trade Union for managers ? Quite honestly what the effing he’ll has what job Nathan Jones got to do with them ?
0 -
Oggy Red said:fenaddick said:ShootersHillGuru said:The LMA can’t hold any authoritative position in all of this though. Isn’t it effectively a Trade Union for managers ? Quite honestly what the effing he’ll has what job Nathan Jones got to do with them ?2
-
fenaddick said:14
-
DOUCHER said:cantersaddick said:DOUCHER said:Uboat said:DOUCHER said:Uboat said:DubaiCAFC said:Uboat said:DubaiCAFC said:SouthWest_Addicks said:DubaiCAFC said:Love it or not, this group mean business, and fully understand the errors so far, I truly think
this is an exciting time for us. This lot are truly behind us..However, I do appreciate all info given sincerely, even when it turns out to be wrong. Just not keen on the repetitive attacks that come with it.
Glad someone seems to have lent you the family brain cell today. At least your sentences are vaguely coherent.2 -
Leuth said:Rick and Paddy are arguing? Awesome. I hope it continues later
I do think that the way things are circulated means conflicting info here and there, definitely to try and suit someone or another in an ownership/SMT that has so many stakeholders.0 -
There is a possibility that after Jones seeing us play today he might change his mind.2
-
Let's hope Nathan Jones isn't at The Valley watching today.
He'll never take the job if he realises how useless we really are.
0 -
PaddyP17 said:Leuth said:Rick and Paddy are arguing? Awesome. I hope it continues later
I do think that the way things are circulated means conflicting info here and there, definitely to try and suit someone or another in an ownership/SMT that has so many stakeholders.0