Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Josh Edwards
Comments
-
That picture looks like a textbook sprain. Doesn’t rule out something worse but as bad as that looks I’m encouraged that it’s only perhaps six weeks out. Fingers crossed.7
-
I presumed that picture was of Pelling's injury?ShootersHillGuru said:That picture looks like a textbook sprain. Doesn’t rule out something worse but as bad as that looks I’m encouraged that it’s only perhaps six weeks out. Fingers crossed.4 -
Ah. Didn’t realise that 🙄ForeverAddickted said:
I presumed that picture was of Pelling's injury?ShootersHillGuru said:That picture looks like a textbook sprain. Doesn’t rule out something worse but as bad as that looks I’m encouraged that it’s only perhaps six weeks out. Fingers crossed.14 -
Could tell by the mardi toenailsShootersHillGuru said:
Ah. Didn’t realise that 🙄ForeverAddickted said:
I presumed that picture was of Pelling's injury?ShootersHillGuru said:That picture looks like a textbook sprain. Doesn’t rule out something worse but as bad as that looks I’m encouraged that it’s only perhaps six weeks out. Fingers crossed.5 -
Yeah sorry that’s mine! 😂1
-
Your socks are too tight matePelling1993 said:
Did a very similar thing to my ankle playing football. A grade 2 tear. Was agony for a couple of days but healed surprisingly quickly. Could run fairly normally about 3/4 weeks later. Hopefully Edwards is similar or better 🤞🏼23 -
He’s probably feeling crepe enough, without you telling him that.cafcdave123 said:
Your socks are too tight matePelling1993 said:Did a very similar thing to my ankle playing football. A grade 2 tear. Was agony for a couple of days but healed surprisingly quickly. Could run fairly normally about 3/4 weeks later. Hopefully Edwards is similar or better 🤞🏼4 -
What strikes me as poor refereeing is that the referee did not consult the linesman who was in a far better position to see the approach of Clare before the tackle.PragueAddick said:
That's how it looked on first viewing on Charlton TV, and for that reason I can't really criticise the ref, who has to make a split-second decision (even if overall he was poor). But when Brownie had a chance to look at the replays he started to see it differently. He said Clare could have gone in 50:50 but hesitated and it was 30:70. He didn't use the word but the implication was clear. Cowardly tackle.killerandflash said:
He went to get the ball, and was fractionally late. A definite foul, it should have been a red, but Clare didn't deliberately attempt to injure Edwards.Lincsaddick said:Clare went to injure his ankle, nowhere near the ball .. definite RED
and this is why VAR is needed, even if in England we make it needlessly cumbersome. Among other things VAR allows the ref and others the time to confirm a player is really injured, as opposed to acting up. They have a chance to say OK, how did that injury happen exactly, I'm looking for that in the replay - like we are doing here, trying to assess from grainy stills where the impact was.
At the end of the day, if a player has to go off and cannot walk off, after a tackle already deemed as a foul, it has to be a red otherwise justice isn't served.
And now I'm thinking of Naby Sarr being sent off by that twat Trevor Kettle in the first minute. This was much worse.
3 -
If you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em! 
7 -
Well yes, although I am not sure wheter nowadays they are not all wired up together, including the 4th official, so we might not see physicsl signs of such consultation. Actually I don’t know why the decision-making and consultation system should be kept hidden from us. We previously discussed on here what the exact role of the 4th official is and even qualified refs were unsure.sm said:
What strikes me as poor refereeing is that the referee did not consult the linesman who was in a far better position to see the approach of Clare before the tackle.PragueAddick said:
That's how it looked on first viewing on Charlton TV, and for that reason I can't really criticise the ref, who has to make a split-second decision (even if overall he was poor). But when Brownie had a chance to look at the replays he started to see it differently. He said Clare could have gone in 50:50 but hesitated and it was 30:70. He didn't use the word but the implication was clear. Cowardly tackle.killerandflash said:
He went to get the ball, and was fractionally late. A definite foul, it should have been a red, but Clare didn't deliberately attempt to injure Edwards.Lincsaddick said:Clare went to injure his ankle, nowhere near the ball .. definite RED
and this is why VAR is needed, even if in England we make it needlessly cumbersome. Among other things VAR allows the ref and others the time to confirm a player is really injured, as opposed to acting up. They have a chance to say OK, how did that injury happen exactly, I'm looking for that in the replay - like we are doing here, trying to assess from grainy stills where the impact was.
At the end of the day, if a player has to go off and cannot walk off, after a tackle already deemed as a foul, it has to be a red otherwise justice isn't served.
And now I'm thinking of Naby Sarr being sent off by that twat Trevor Kettle in the first minute. This was much worse.1 - Sponsored links:
-
CutbacksSolidgone said:Whats happened to the bucket of cold water and a sponge?6 -
Spot on sm.👍sm said:
What strikes me as poor refereeing is that the referee did not consult the linesman who was in a far better position to see the approach of Clare before the tackle.PragueAddick said:
That's how it looked on first viewing on Charlton TV, and for that reason I can't really criticise the ref, who has to make a split-second decision (even if overall he was poor). But when Brownie had a chance to look at the replays he started to see it differently. He said Clare could have gone in 50:50 but hesitated and it was 30:70. He didn't use the word but the implication was clear. Cowardly tackle.killerandflash said:
He went to get the ball, and was fractionally late. A definite foul, it should have been a red, but Clare didn't deliberately attempt to injure Edwards.Lincsaddick said:Clare went to injure his ankle, nowhere near the ball .. definite RED
and this is why VAR is needed, even if in England we make it needlessly cumbersome. Among other things VAR allows the ref and others the time to confirm a player is really injured, as opposed to acting up. They have a chance to say OK, how did that injury happen exactly, I'm looking for that in the replay - like we are doing here, trying to assess from grainy stills where the impact was.
At the end of the day, if a player has to go off and cannot walk off, after a tackle already deemed as a foul, it has to be a red otherwise justice isn't served.
And now I'm thinking of Naby Sarr being sent off by that twat Trevor Kettle in the first minute. This was much worse.0 -
I played semi pro , I've had that same tackle on me , fortunately I didn't break anything, tall and bendy me , hopefully same news with Josh , speedy recovery Mr Edwards4
-
32 -
Fingers crossed Josh will be OK. Assume he's going for scans today or do they need to leave it a few days for the swelling to go down?0
-
Yes, I have friend who's an assistant ref in L1/L2, they are all wired up, including the 4th official and they are talking all the time throughout the game. He said it's constant and a big reason he doesn't hear comments from the crowd as much as he used to. They might get to a ground at midday for a 3pm kick-off because they have to set-up and test the comms equipment.PragueAddick said:
Well yes, although I am not sure wheter nowadays they are not all wired up together, including the 4th official, so we might not see physicsl signs of such consultation. Actually I don’t know why the decision-making and consultation system should be kept hidden from us. We previously discussed on here what the exact role of the 4th official is and even qualified refs were unsure.sm said:
What strikes me as poor refereeing is that the referee did not consult the linesman who was in a far better position to see the approach of Clare before the tackle.PragueAddick said:
That's how it looked on first viewing on Charlton TV, and for that reason I can't really criticise the ref, who has to make a split-second decision (even if overall he was poor). But when Brownie had a chance to look at the replays he started to see it differently. He said Clare could have gone in 50:50 but hesitated and it was 30:70. He didn't use the word but the implication was clear. Cowardly tackle.killerandflash said:
He went to get the ball, and was fractionally late. A definite foul, it should have been a red, but Clare didn't deliberately attempt to injure Edwards.Lincsaddick said:Clare went to injure his ankle, nowhere near the ball .. definite RED
and this is why VAR is needed, even if in England we make it needlessly cumbersome. Among other things VAR allows the ref and others the time to confirm a player is really injured, as opposed to acting up. They have a chance to say OK, how did that injury happen exactly, I'm looking for that in the replay - like we are doing here, trying to assess from grainy stills where the impact was.
At the end of the day, if a player has to go off and cannot walk off, after a tackle already deemed as a foul, it has to be a red otherwise justice isn't served.
And now I'm thinking of Naby Sarr being sent off by that twat Trevor Kettle in the first minute. This was much worse.4 -
Unfortunately, being able to walk on it doesn't mean there's not a break, albeit it's probably not a major one. I managed to walk halfway down Box Hill and the quarter mile back to where we'd parked the car with a broken bone in my foot. And I wasn't the hard bastard that Edwards appears to be.No.1 in South London said:
2 -
I walked around for a week on a broken tibia.
and worth nothing for those that are praying for a break not ligaments… the break healed after 6 weeks in a cast and I was back playing football pretty much straight after. I separately did the ankle ligaments with no break and that was A LOT longer
2 -
I'm thinking we should start an ankle based OnlyFans. Seems unfair that the Lifers are getting this quality content for free!Sage said:If you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em! 16 -
15
- Sponsored links:
-
Are all these ankles a replacement for the "Whose rack" thread?7
-
Whatever floats your boat mate.0 -
Didn’t Team GB just have a marathon runner complete the run with a broken leg ? I think Josh should man up and get kicking a few balls about. Run it off man.5
-
Given that NJ doesn’t like to divulge information relating to injuries we’ll probably have no idea as to the extend of Edwards injury.1
-
So is this where we apply for a CL foot fetish Onlyfans?1
-
Stuart Pearce tried to run off a broken leg0
-
I'm sure Johnny Robinson took his pen at Wembley with a fracture, they found out after the game.0
-
I worry about the women you’ve seen with legs like mine.SuedeAdidas said:6 -
Go ahead mate, there’s some proper weird and creepy people out there that would pay stupid money for pictures of people’s feet and ankles 🤣Pelling1993 said:
I'm thinking we should start an ankle based OnlyFans. Seems unfair that the Lifers are getting this quality content for free!Sage said:If you can’t beat ‘em, join ‘em! 4 -
Can I play…?
4
