Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

Chuks

1293032343557

Comments

  • Hylton is good at shit house, chicks is good at bullying defenders. Has and leaburn need to do that more
    I bet Wycombe's defenders are terrified.
  • to be a big man like chucks and only feel a minor thing in your groin is obviously gonna be a worry 
  • Mrkinski said:
    If his contract was paid up this would not give us money to spend! 
    Not if paid in full.
  • Mrkinski said:
    If his contract was paid up this would not give us money to spend! 
    whooooooosh
  • I bet Wycombe's defenders are terrified.
    I bet you thought you were joking....
  • Spoke to him in the car park after todays game , he’s available Wednesday but doesn’t expect for the squad to be changed much while we keep on getting the results .
    Available Wednesday but not today ;)
  • Available Wednesday but not today ;)
    Jet lag from his latest sojourn
  • Sponsored links:


  • Mrkinski said:
    If his contract was paid up this would not give us money to spend! 
    There's a Spinal Tap 'the amp goes to 11' vibe to these discussions about paying off Chuks.
  • NabySarr said:
    If he’s fit then not having him on the bench is just silly 
    Why?
  • Spoke to him in the car park after todays game , he’s available Wednesday but doesn’t expect for the squad to be changed much while we keep on getting the results .
    Surprised he remembered where the ground is its  been so long 😉🙂
  • Because he’s a better player than others on the bench?
    He WAS a better player. Now, who knows?!
  • Sponsored links:


  • Talal said:
    I agree he hasn't offered as much as he used to but I still think he's a better option than Ahadme and Hylton. May as well get some use out of him before he goes. 
    Totally agree. Ahadme has nowhere near the quality of chuks and hylton is just there as an injury time bully when we’re winning. If chuks is match fit, get him in the squad. May only be another handful of games anyway. 
  • Classic Charlton Life theorem right there and the fella , forgotten who it was, was adamant about it 😂
    talalsrightfoot. Refused to accept he was wrong even when it was explained to him and got so narky about his idiocy being pointed out he asked for his account to be closed
  • NabySarr said:

    Nearly everytime Aneke comes off the bench we improve as a team. Nearly everytime Hylton or Ahadme come off the bench we get worse 
    Hylton P6, G1, A1.
    Aneke P9, G1, A2

    Ahadme P18, G1, A1. 

    Disagree with we get worse with Hylton, certainly true Ahadme is always a downgrade.
  • cabbles said:
    It’s more that why should he just walk back in.  I used Hylton and Ahadme on the basis they’ve scored the same amount of league goals as our cheat code, and Hylton has done it in less appearances to highlight it’s pretty drastic we just assume he’s “fit” let’s just get him back on the bench.

    You’re right in that I’m frustrated, but I genuinely don’t see what having him straight back in that squad will do, based on those diminishing returns.  For want of a better analogy, it’s like somehow, we’ve convinced ourselves this guy was like some 11/10 we pulled in a bar once, but forgotten all the alcohol we consumed and the morning after.  I still cannot get my head around it, even less so now with a couple of months of his contract left to run, and his last 12 months in a Charlton shirt 





    Sunk cost fallacy.

  • NabySarr said:
    Again, just looking at goals and assists is way too simplistic. Aneke is better in the air, better at holding the ball up and linking play than both of the others 




    Not when he's injured and unavailable he's not. Which is most of the time now.
  • Off_it said:
    He WAS a better player. Now, who knows?!

    I can say with a very high degree of confidence that he is better than Ahadme who I have down as non league standard and have seen no quality from whatsoever all season.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Roland Out Forever!