Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.

STATBANK: CHARLTON 2-2 LINCOLN

lancashire lad
lancashire lad Posts: 15,626
in General Charlton
thanks for the 68 marks







Comments

  • thai malaysia addick
    thai malaysia addick Posts: 18,337
    I have to say I thought the referee performed better than some of our players
  • lancashire lad
    lancashire lad Posts: 15,626
    thai malaysia addick said:
    I have to say I thought the referee performed better than some of our players
    not difficult!!!
  • eastterrace6168
    eastterrace6168 Posts: 22,536
    thai malaysia addick said:
    I have to say I thought the referee performed better than some of our players
    He was certainly playing to the cameras, that's for sure...total waste of space at times, may as well have got someone from the crowd and shoved a whistle in his hand...
  • redman
    redman Posts: 5,285
    thai malaysia addick said:
    I have to say I thought the referee performed better than some of our players
    We've had a lot worse for sure. But he was very pennickity and gave a lot of soft free kicks. His fussing at corners at corners got very annoying. Long lectures, then nothing happenned except occassional free kicks to defenders. And how he only added on 5 minutes is beyond me.
  • killerandflash
    killerandflash Posts: 69,855
    redman said:
    thai malaysia addick said:
    I have to say I thought the referee performed better than some of our players
    We've had a lot worse for sure. But he was very pennickity and gave a lot of soft free kicks. His fussing at corners at corners got very annoying. Long lectures, then nothing happenned except occassional free kicks to defenders. And how he only added on 5 minutes is beyond me.
    Yes, he should have added on 2 minutes just for the time HE wasted due to his interventions at corners.

    No coincidence that the 3 players at the bottom of the rankings were all hooked first, as all 3 had poor games.
  • ateamofcorygibbs
    ateamofcorygibbs Posts: 1,193
    edited April 7
    Out of interest why no marks for Mitchell and Dixon? I thought if you played 30(?) minutes you were eligible 
  • lancashire lad
    lancashire lad Posts: 15,626
    ateamofcorygibbs said:
    Out of interest why no marks for Mitchell and Dixon? I thought if you played 30(?) minutes you were eligible 
    I miscalculated or to put it simply - made a mistake - sorry
  • Redhenry
    Redhenry Posts: 5,359
    Can we have a players average mark league table please @lancashire lad
  • lancashire lad
    lancashire lad Posts: 15,626
    Redhenry said:
    Can we have a players average mark league table please @lancashire lad
    sorry but no, the stats I provide take quite a lot of my time and that is enough for me. Also on what criteria would you make the table, at present Gilbert would be top which is a bit silly. If you are anyone else wish to compile the table please be my guest.
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,008
    edited April 7
    Redhenry said:
    Can we have a players average mark league table please @lancashire lad
    Top 5 (ignoring those playing few games)
    Jones 7.15
    Ramsay 7.11
    Coventry 6.72
    T Campbell 6.64
    Edwards 6.64           (which is close to how I'd rate)
  • Sponsored links:



  • CafcWest
    CafcWest Posts: 6,171
    Covered End said:
    Redhenry said:
    Can we have a players average mark league table please @lancashire lad
    Top 5 (ignoring those playing few games)
    Jones 7.15
    Ramsay 7.11
    Coventry 6.72
    T Campbell 6.64
    Edwards 6.64           (which is close to how I'd rate)
    Gillesphey had some really poor games early on and as a result got marked down (probably rightly) but has completely turned it around and if only the last 10 or so games were taken into account then would probably be up there.
  • Covered End
    Covered End Posts: 52,008
    CafcWest said:
    Covered End said:
    Redhenry said:
    Can we have a players average mark league table please @lancashire lad
    Top 5 (ignoring those playing few games)
    Jones 7.15
    Ramsay 7.11
    Coventry 6.72
    T Campbell 6.64
    Edwards 6.64           (which is close to how I'd rate)
    Gillesphey had some really poor games early on and as a result got marked down (probably rightly) but has completely turned it around and if only the last 10 or so games were taken into account then would probably be up there.
    Agreed, but although called player of the year, we all know it’s player of the season, not player of the last 10 games.
  • CafcWest
    CafcWest Posts: 6,171
    Covered End said:
    CafcWest said:
    Covered End said:
    Redhenry said:
    Can we have a players average mark league table please @lancashire lad
    Top 5 (ignoring those playing few games)
    Jones 7.15
    Ramsay 7.11
    Coventry 6.72
    T Campbell 6.64
    Edwards 6.64           (which is close to how I'd rate)
    Gillesphey had some really poor games early on and as a result got marked down (probably rightly) but has completely turned it around and if only the last 10 or so games were taken into account then would probably be up there.
    Agreed, but although called player of the year, we all know it’s player of the season, not player of the last 10 games.
    True...but I'm trying to blank out memories of the first half of the season!

Categories

“Marketplace”