Attention: Please take a moment to consider our terms and conditions before posting.
Kent Cricket 2025
Comments
-
Surrey 87-1 off 10 (Parkinson got the wicket of Pope, caught by Denly despite the commentators giving the catch first to Crawley and then to Agar)1
-
101-4 now2
-
Surrey finish on 192-7 thanks to 63* off 27 from Laurie Evans who will be playing against the Fulton and Denly families' Whitstable tomorrow for Dartford.
Pick of the Kent bowlers were Stewart (4-0-27-3) and Parkinson (3-0-19-2)1 -
Horrendous few overs and we're now 113/5. NOPE 113/61
-
Bit of a turnaround this0
-
15.4 required run rate off the last 50
-
Kent finish on 151-9. Some not very clever cricket from us including three run outs.1
-
Absolutely shocking watched it on the stream at 107-2 we should have taken it all the way.0
-
Disappointing result.
Very unprofessional to have 3 run outs and the middle order just disintegrated. No other word for it really.1 - Sponsored links:
-
Someone said before the Wycombe home game that we never get successful seasons with Kent and Charlton together. So given how this is going, I assume we'll be going up as champions next season? Worth a bet??1
-
Hampshire batting first are 68/4 from 101
-
Hampshire finish on 177/7. 3 wickets for Rogers3
-
Can’t believe it but I have a horrible feeling we are messing this right up.1
-
Scrap that! What a win 😂4
-
000__Jaaaaay__000 said:Can’t believe it but I have a horrible feeling we are messing this right up.0
-
Kent win with an over to spare2
-
Good win. Zak seems to have got some form back before the India series.4
-
Just seen Cohen in a protective boot. Didn't realise he had yet another injury0
-
Great stuff, Spitfires !
Bring on the next T20 !
Aaaaah....just looked at the fixtures2 - Sponsored links:
-
moutuakilla said:Just seen Cohen in a protective boot. Didn't realise he had yet another injury0
-
moutuakilla said:Just seen Cohen in a protective boot. Didn't realise he had yet another injury0
-
For the Surrey game, Crawley is unavailable due to England duties and is replaced in the squad by the fit again Evision. Ben Dawkins travels with the squad but he can't play because he hasn't got a pro contract. There's nothing like giving a youngster some experience of carrying the drinks.1
-
Surrey won the toss and elected to bowl. We've left out Klaassen and Evison. Poor Surrey have run out of keepers - no Foakes, no Smith, no Pope, no Blake so Laurie Evans has drawn the short straw. To be fair he has done it before but still a surprise - it's his 8th game as a pro doing so.
0 -
Addick Addict said:Surrey won the toss and elected to bowl. We've left out Klaassen and Evison. Poor Surrey have run out of keepers - no Foakes, no Smith, no Pope, no Blake so Laurie Evans has drawn the short straw. To be fair he has done it before but still a surprise - it's his 8th game as a pro doing so.3
-
Chris Jordan has just taken 4-10 off 4 overs. He's still, seemingly, got it.1
-
Finished on 171-7
A very "up and down" innings from us. Started well at 46-0 off 4.2 but then just 34-3 off the next 7.4 overs. Joe Denly then smashed 40 off 22 (although I rather fear he is going to be added to our injury list) and a quickfire 18 off 7 from Rogers gave us something to bowl at.2 -
I reckon 160 was about par.
So Kent are slight favourites from here0 -
Addick Addict said:Finished on 171-7
A very "up and down" innings from us. Started well at 46-0 off 4.2 but then just 34-3 off the next 7.4 overs. Joe Denly then smashed 40 off 22 (although I rather fear he is going to be added to our injury list) and a quickfire 18 off 7 from Rogers gave us something to bowl at.0 -
killerandflash said:Addick Addict said:Finished on 171-7
A very "up and down" innings from us. Started well at 46-0 off 4.2 but then just 34-3 off the next 7.4 overs. Joe Denly then smashed 40 off 22 (although I rather fear he is going to be added to our injury list) and a quickfire 18 off 7 from Rogers gave us something to bowl at.1