Apparently we have shown an interest in Keillor Dunn, source is the Barnsley chronicle supposedly. Personally think he was the best player we came up against last season.
North East born lad who spent time at Middlesbrough’s academy as a kid
The only thing I'd have with Boro and DKD is where he'd fit in , they've got Fin Azaz and Morgan Whittaker that can play a similar role to DKD.
Apparently we have shown an interest in Keillor Dunn, source is the Barnsley chronicle supposedly. Personally think he was the best player we came up against last season.
Apparently we have shown an interest in Keillor Dunn, source is the Barnsley chronicle supposedly. Personally think he was the best player we came up against last season.
I don't see this one happening but would absolutely love it if it came off, feel he'd make us a much more exciting side to watch and could compete in the Carey/Berry role as well as the TC role, so would bring a bit more of that flexibility that Nathan likes
Apparently we have shown an interest in Keillor Dunn, source is the Barnsley chronicle supposedly. Personally think he was the best player we came up against last season.
North East born lad who spent time at Middlesbrough’s academy as a kid
The only thing I'd have with Boro and DKD is where he'd fit in , they've got Fin Azaz and Morgan Whittaker that can play a similar role to DKD.
For the sake of those who don't have Twitter/X, sometimes it would be helpful for original posters to mention who the person they are posting here is. Too many times, a discussion starts and then it turns it's a bloke bored in there bedroom with less than 250 followers.
Appreciate those who call out that it's a fake rumour etc.
please disregard @stoneroses19’s comments . Less than 20,000 visits here and no promotes (a whiff of the North about ‘em n all).
It hurts to have been here since 2007 and never written a promote-worthy post 😢
I don't see why promotes are given as they're purely subjective. Why should the opinion of whoever awards them be shown to carry more weight than others? Stick to likes. We're an online community of equals, not one where some are more equal than others (or they shouldn't be).
I haven't feasted as much on humble pie as some get through on here, but I can thoroughly recommend the sour grapes 😉
Yeah, it can be a harsh world.
Some people post and get 100 likes. No promote.
But a few posters only have to sneeze and the Mods fall over themselves to award a promote.
It was the same at primary school with only teacher's pet being given gold stars.
School life, Charlton life.....it's a harsh world 😊
Apparently we have shown an interest in Keillor Dunn, source is the Barnsley chronicle supposedly. Personally think he was the best player we came up against last season.
Piece says interest from us and Boro but no bids , but the fee wanted is substantial.
If they're after 5m I'd be surprised we're still interested!
They can ask for £5m all they want but I'd expect it to be another one where reality bites later in the window. Feels like there's some League 1 clubs with some very very optimistic valuations.
Let's be fair, most of these clubs are fully aware that they are not going to actually get the fees they are quoting and will be negotiated down to the price they actually expect.
But similarly clubs don't want to (be seen as) flogging their best players off so we get the smoke and mirrors of these quoted fees.
If anyone started making serious moves on TC you can be sure the "public" fee put out there would be something like 3-4million but we'd have a lower acceptable price behind the scenes.
For the sake of those who don't have Twitter/X, sometimes it would be helpful for original posters to mention who the person they are posting here is. Too many times, a discussion starts and then it turns it's a bloke bored in there bedroom with less than 250 followers.
Appreciate those who call out that it's a fake rumour etc.
please disregard @stoneroses19’s comments . Less than 20,000 visits here and no promotes (a whiff of the North about ‘em n all).
It hurts to have been here since 2007 and never written a promote-worthy post 😢
I don't see why promotes are given as they're purely subjective. Why should the opinion of whoever awards them be shown to carry more weight than others? Stick to likes. We're an online community of equals, not one where some are more equal than others (or they shouldn't be).
I haven't feasted as much on humble pie as some get through on here, but I can thoroughly recommend the sour grapes 😉
Yeah, it can be a harsh world.
Some people post and get 100 likes. No promote.
But a few posters only have to sneeze and the Mods fall over themselves to award a promote.
It was the same at primary school with only teacher's pet being given gold stars.
School life, Charlton life.....it's a harsh world 😊
Apparently we have shown an interest in Keillor Dunn, source is the Barnsley chronicle supposedly. Personally think he was the best player we came up against last season.
Not only was he the best player we came up against, he offers something we desperately need - a spark. Creativity. An X factor. We have a lot of "meat and potatoes" players but we are light on those who are just a bit different
Apparently we have shown an interest in Keillor Dunn, source is the Barnsley chronicle supposedly. Personally think he was the best player we came up against last season.
For the sake of those who don't have Twitter/X, sometimes it would be helpful for original posters to mention who the person they are posting here is. Too many times, a discussion starts and then it turns it's a bloke bored in there bedroom with less than 250 followers.
Appreciate those who call out that it's a fake rumour etc.
please disregard @stoneroses19’s comments . Less than 20,000 visits here and no promotes (a whiff of the North about ‘em n all).
It hurts to have been here since 2007 and never written a promote-worthy post 😢
I don't see why promotes are given as they're purely subjective. Why should the opinion of whoever awards them be shown to carry more weight than others? Stick to likes. We're an online community of equals, not one where some are more equal than others (or they shouldn't be).
I haven't feasted as much on humble pie as some get through on here, but I can thoroughly recommend the sour grapes 😉
Apparently we have shown an interest in Keillor Dunn, source is the Barnsley chronicle supposedly. Personally think he was the best player we came up against last season.
Not only was he the best player we came up against, he offers something we desperately need - a spark. Creativity. An X factor. We have a lot of "meat and potatoes" players but we are light on those who are just a bit different
This is it exactly , we need that creativity and " X Factor" , someone that can create a bit of magic in games where we aren't going to have a lot of the ball or a lot of chances.
For the sake of those who don't have Twitter/X, sometimes it would be helpful for original posters to mention who the person they are posting here is. Too many times, a discussion starts and then it turns it's a bloke bored in there bedroom with less than 250 followers.
Appreciate those who call out that it's a fake rumour etc.
please disregard @stoneroses19’s comments . Less than 20,000 visits here and no promotes (a whiff of the North about ‘em n all).
It hurts to have been here since 2007 and never written a promote-worthy post 😢
I don't see why promotes are given as they're purely subjective. Why should the opinion of whoever awards them be shown to carry more weight than others? Stick to likes. We're an online community of equals, not one where some are more equal than others (or they shouldn't be).
I haven't feasted as much on humble pie as some get through on here, but I can thoroughly recommend the sour grapes 😉
Yeah, it can be a harsh world.
Some people post and get 100 likes. No promote.
But a few posters only have to sneeze and the Mods fall over themselves to award a promote.
It was the same at primary school with only teacher's pet being given gold stars.
School life, Charlton life.....it's a harsh world 😊
Apparently we have shown an interest in Keillor Dunn, source is the Barnsley chronicle supposedly. Personally think he was the best player we came up against last season.
Not only was he the best player we came up against, he offers something we desperately need - a spark. Creativity. An X factor. We have a lot of "meat and potatoes" players but we are light on those who are just a bit different
We are going to need to win games with moments throughout the upcoming season. Making sure we get a couple players that can make something out of nothing is important this summer.
Apparently we have shown an interest in Keillor Dunn, source is the Barnsley chronicle supposedly. Personally think he was the best player we came up against last season.
Apparently we have shown an interest in Keillor Dunn, source is the Barnsley chronicle supposedly. Personally think he was the best player we came up against last season.
Surely every post is a subjective choice of words, and every post from everybody is saying ‘look at me’. That’s how these things work, similar to graffiti.
Don't want to labour this as I'm aware it's side tracking the thread, but to be clear, my point is that the assessment of the post as being worthy of a promote is subjective. If I can't give you a promote when I think you deserve one, that means my opinion on whether it is or not is irrelevant. However, some other self appointed judge with powers on here can decide that. Why? We're not all being treated as equals. Why have an option to rate someone's post that isn't available to all?
Because they literally run the forum for our benefit, at not a small financial cost, let them have a bit of fun.
Dont post very often but having followed thread for many weeks it's been used to post what we think the club should sign. Can we please have a discussion setup to cover this exact point?
Apparently we have shown an interest in Keillor Dunn, source is the Barnsley chronicle supposedly. Personally think he was the best player we came up against last season.
For the sake of those who don't have Twitter/X, sometimes it would be helpful for original posters to mention who the person they are posting here is. Too many times, a discussion starts and then it turns it's a bloke bored in there bedroom with less than 250 followers.
Appreciate those who call out that it's a fake rumour etc.
please disregard @stoneroses19’s comments . Less than 20,000 visits here and no promotes (a whiff of the North about ‘em n all).
It hurts to have been here since 2007 and never written a promote-worthy post 😢
I don't see why promotes are given as they're purely subjective. Why should the opinion of whoever awards them be shown to carry more weight than others? Stick to likes. We're an online community of equals, not one where some are more equal than others (or they shouldn't be).
I haven't feasted as much on humble pie as some get through on here, but I can thoroughly recommend the sour grapes 😉
Yeah, it can be a harsh world.
Some people post and get 100 likes. No promote.
But a few posters only have to sneeze and the Mods fall over themselves to award a promote.
It was the same at primary school with only teacher's pet being given gold stars.
School life, Charlton life.....it's a harsh world 😊
Apparently we have shown an interest in Keillor Dunn, source is the Barnsley chronicle supposedly. Personally think he was the best player we came up against last season.
Piece says interest from us and Boro but no bids , but the fee wanted is substantial.
If they're after 5m I'd be surprised we're still interested!
They can ask for £5m all they want but I'd expect it to be another one where reality bites later in the window. Feels like there's some League 1 clubs with some very very optimistic valuations.
They can demand that fee though because they have another 3 years left on his deal they know he’s not worth that another way of saying we don’t want to sell but if anyone is crazy enough to offer that kind of money why not.
For the sake of those who don't have Twitter/X, sometimes it would be helpful for original posters to mention who the person they are posting here is. Too many times, a discussion starts and then it turns it's a bloke bored in there bedroom with less than 250 followers.
Appreciate those who call out that it's a fake rumour etc.
please disregard @stoneroses19’s comments . Less than 20,000 visits here and no promotes (a whiff of the North about ‘em n all).
It hurts to have been here since 2007 and never written a promote-worthy post 😢
I don't see why promotes are given as they're purely subjective. Why should the opinion of whoever awards them be shown to carry more weight than others? Stick to likes. We're an online community of equals, not one where some are more equal than others (or they shouldn't be).
I haven't feasted as much on humble pie as some get through on here, but I can thoroughly recommend the sour grapes 😉
Yeah, it can be a harsh world.
Some people post and get 100 likes. No promote.
But a few posters only have to sneeze and the Mods fall over themselves to award a promote.
It was the same at primary school with only teacher's pet being given gold stars.
School life, Charlton life.....it's a harsh world 😊
Surely every post is a subjective choice of words, and every post from everybody is saying ‘look at me’. That’s how these things work, similar to graffiti.
Don't want to labour this as I'm aware it's side tracking the thread, but to be clear, my point is that the assessment of the post as being worthy of a promote is subjective. If I can't give you a promote when I think you deserve one, that means my opinion on whether it is or not is irrelevant. However, some other self appointed judge with powers on here can decide that. Why? We're not all being treated as equals. Why have an option to rate someone's post that isn't available to all?
I’n not bothered how many likes I have (no shock there 😂) and have never given a like or a lol but I don’t see the problem in those who run this site being able to do a promote or whatever - they spend a lot of time for the benefit of all us users of the forum so if they want there own little award system, why not ?
Apparently we have shown an interest in Keillor Dunn, source is the Barnsley chronicle supposedly. Personally think he was the best player we came up against last season.
Not only was he the best player we came up against, he offers something we desperately need - a spark. Creativity. An X factor. We have a lot of "meat and potatoes" players but we are light on those who are just a bit different
Meat and potatoes 😂
That tickled me
at least we have meat and potatoes these days. I think back to the Fraser’s, Kirk’s and Gilbey’s of this world. They were just about potatoes
Apparently we have shown an interest in Keillor Dunn, source is the Barnsley chronicle supposedly. Personally think he was the best player we came up against last season.
Not only was he the best player we came up against, he offers something we desperately need - a spark. Creativity. An X factor. We have a lot of "meat and potatoes" players but we are light on those who are just a bit different
Meat and potatoes 😂
That tickled me
at least we have meat and potatoes these days. I think back to the Fraser’s, Kirk’s and Gilbey’s of this world. They were just about potatoes
I personally think you are being a bit harsh on potatoes
Apparently we have shown an interest in Keillor Dunn, source is the Barnsley chronicle supposedly. Personally think he was the best player we came up against last season.
Not only was he the best player we came up against, he offers something we desperately need - a spark. Creativity. An X factor. We have a lot of "meat and potatoes" players but we are light on those who are just a bit different
Meat and potatoes 😂
That tickled me
at least we have meat and potatoes these days. I think back to the Fraser’s, Kirk’s and Gilbey’s of this world. They were just about potatoes
Apparently we have shown an interest in Keillor Dunn, source is the Barnsley chronicle supposedly. Personally think he was the best player we came up against last season.
Comments
Some people post and get 100 likes.
No promote.
But a few posters only have to sneeze and the Mods fall over themselves to award a promote.
It was the same at primary school with only teacher's pet being given gold stars.
School life, Charlton life.....it's a harsh world 😊
But similarly clubs don't want to (be seen as) flogging their best players off so we get the smoke and mirrors of these quoted fees.
If anyone started making serious moves on TC you can be sure the "public" fee put out there would be something like 3-4million but we'd have a lower acceptable price behind the scenes.
Feeeeeeeeesh !
Can we please have a discussion setup to cover this exact point?
That tickled me
at least we have meat and potatoes these days. I think back to the Fraser’s, Kirk’s and Gilbey’s of this world. They were just about potatoes
Or is that just me?